Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Also document volumeClaimTemplate for TaskRun #2502

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 28, 2020
Merged

Also document volumeClaimTemplate for TaskRun #2502

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 28, 2020

Conversation

jlpettersson
Copy link
Member

Changes

The volumeClaimTemplate workspace is only documented for PipelineRun.

This commit adds documentation of volumeClaimTemplate also for TaskRun.

Submitter Checklist

These are the criteria that every PR should meet, please check them off as you
review them:

See the contribution guide for more details.

Double check this list of stuff that's easy to miss:

Reviewer Notes

If API changes are included, additive changes must be approved by at least two OWNERS and backwards incompatible changes must be approved by more than 50% of the OWNERS, and they must first be added in a backwards compatible way.

@jlpettersson
Also document volumeClaimTemplate for TaskRun
416b482 
The volumeClaimTemplate workspace is only documented for PipelineRun.

This commit adds documentation of volumeClaimTemplate also for TaskRun.
@tekton-robot tekton-robot added size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Apr 28, 2020
@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @jlpettersson. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a tektoncd member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@eddycharly
Copy link
Member

/ok-to-test

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Apr 28, 2020
vdemeester
vdemeester approved these changes Apr 28, 2020
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@vdemeester vdemeester left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/meow

@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

@vdemeester: cat image

In response to this:

/meow

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: vdemeester

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 28, 2020
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Apr 28, 2020

/lgtm

@tekton-robot tekton-robot assigned ghost Apr 28, 2020
@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 28, 2020
@jlpettersson
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-tekton-pipeline-build-tests

@jlpettersson
Copy link
Member Author

level=error msg="Timeout exceeded: try increasing it by passing --timeout option"

/test pull-tekton-pipeline-build-tests

@tekton-robot tekton-robot merged commit a7a4c5d into tektoncd:master Apr 28, 2020
@afrittoli afrittoli added the kind/documentation Categorizes issue or PR as related to documentation. label Apr 30, 2020
jlpettersson added a commit to jlpettersson/community that referenced this pull request May 19, 2020
@jlpettersson
Add Jonas to the org
19af2b5 
Jonas has recently become a regularly contributor. He started with adding a minor [_missing_ `omitempty`](tektoncd/pipeline#2301) and then [proposed some ideas](tektoncd/pipeline#1986 (comment)) around workspaces and PersistentVolumeClaim creation and continued to [elaborate around those ideas](tektoncd/pipeline#1986 (comment)). A sunny day a few days later, he also submitted an [extensive implementation for volumeClaimTemplate](tektoncd/pipeline#2326), corresponding to the idea discussions.

A few days later submitted a [small refactoring PR](tektoncd/pipeline#2392), and he also listened to community members that [proposed changes](tektoncd/pipeline#2450) to his implementation about volumeClaimTemplates and did an [implementation for that proposal](tektoncd/pipeline#2453).

A rainy day, he also wrote [technical documentation about PVCs](tektoncd/pipeline#2521) including adding an example that caused _flaky_ integration tests for the whole community during multiple days. When he understood his mistake, he submitted a [removal of the example](tektoncd/pipeline#2546) that caused flaky tests.

He has also put his toe into Tekton Catalog and [contributed to the buildah task](tektoncd/pipeline#2546).

This has followed, mostly with more PRs to the Pipeline project:

- tektoncd/pipeline#2460
- tektoncd/pipeline#2491
- tektoncd/pipeline#2502
- tektoncd/pipeline#2506
- tektoncd/pipeline#2632
- tektoncd/pipeline#2633
- tektoncd/pipeline#2634
- tektoncd/pipeline#2636
- tektoncd/pipeline#2601
- tektoncd/pipeline#2630

Jonas is excited about the great community around Tekton and the project! He now would like to join the org.
@jlpettersson jlpettersson mentioned this pull request May 19, 2020
Merged
tekton-robot pushed a commit to tektoncd/community that referenced this pull request May 20, 2020
@jlpettersson @tekton-robot
Add Jonas to the org
0ab887f 
Jonas has recently become a regularly contributor. He started with adding a minor [_missing_ `omitempty`](tektoncd/pipeline#2301) and then [proposed some ideas](tektoncd/pipeline#1986 (comment)) around workspaces and PersistentVolumeClaim creation and continued to [elaborate around those ideas](tektoncd/pipeline#1986 (comment)). A sunny day a few days later, he also submitted an [extensive implementation for volumeClaimTemplate](tektoncd/pipeline#2326), corresponding to the idea discussions.

A few days later submitted a [small refactoring PR](tektoncd/pipeline#2392), and he also listened to community members that [proposed changes](tektoncd/pipeline#2450) to his implementation about volumeClaimTemplates and did an [implementation for that proposal](tektoncd/pipeline#2453).

A rainy day, he also wrote [technical documentation about PVCs](tektoncd/pipeline#2521) including adding an example that caused _flaky_ integration tests for the whole community during multiple days. When he understood his mistake, he submitted a [removal of the example](tektoncd/pipeline#2546) that caused flaky tests.

He has also put his toe into Tekton Catalog and [contributed to the buildah task](tektoncd/pipeline#2546).

This has followed, mostly with more PRs to the Pipeline project:

- tektoncd/pipeline#2460
- tektoncd/pipeline#2491
- tektoncd/pipeline#2502
- tektoncd/pipeline#2506
- tektoncd/pipeline#2632
- tektoncd/pipeline#2633
- tektoncd/pipeline#2634
- tektoncd/pipeline#2636
- tektoncd/pipeline#2601
- tektoncd/pipeline#2630

Jonas is excited about the great community around Tekton and the project! He now would like to join the org.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@vdemeester vdemeester vdemeester approved these changes

@abayer abayer Awaiting requested review from abayer

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. kind/documentation Categorizes issue or PR as related to documentation. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
5 participants
@jlpettersson @tekton-robot @eddycharly @vdemeester @afrittoli