Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: usage of rand in simulation test #740

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 21, 2022
Merged

fix: usage of rand in simulation test #740

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
523995c
fix randomness
lumtis Apr 21, 2022
ab2b0da
change params
lumtis Apr 21, 2022
87a9215
comment
lumtis Apr 21, 2022
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
6 changes: 3 additions & 3 deletions x/campaign/simulation/simulation.go
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -269,7 +269,7 @@ func SimulateMsgBurnVouchers(
return func(
r *rand.Rand, app *baseapp.BaseApp, ctx sdk.Context, accs []simtypes.Account, chainID string,
) (simtypes.OperationMsg, []simtypes.FutureOperation, error) {
campID, simAccount, vouchers, found := GetAccountWithVouchers(ctx, bk, k, accs, false)
campID, simAccount, vouchers, found := GetAccountWithVouchers(r, ctx, bk, k, accs, false)
if !found {
return simtypes.NoOpMsg(types.ModuleName, types.TypeMsgBurnVouchers, "skip burn vouchers"), nil, nil
}
Expand All @@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ func SimulateMsgRedeemVouchers(
return func(
r *rand.Rand, app *baseapp.BaseApp, ctx sdk.Context, accs []simtypes.Account, chainID string,
) (simtypes.OperationMsg, []simtypes.FutureOperation, error) {
campID, simAccount, vouchers, found := GetAccountWithVouchers(ctx, bk, k, accs, true)
campID, simAccount, vouchers, found := GetAccountWithVouchers(r, ctx, bk, k, accs, true)
if !found {
return simtypes.NoOpMsg(types.ModuleName, types.TypeMsgRedeemVouchers, "skip redeem vouchers"), nil, nil
}
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -343,7 +343,7 @@ func SimulateMsgSendVouchers(
return func(
r *rand.Rand, app *baseapp.BaseApp, ctx sdk.Context, accs []simtypes.Account, chainID string,
) (simtypes.OperationMsg, []simtypes.FutureOperation, error) {
_, simAccount, vouchers, found := GetAccountWithVouchers(ctx, bk, k, accs, false)
_, simAccount, vouchers, found := GetAccountWithVouchers(r, ctx, bk, k, accs, false)
if !found {
return simtypes.NoOpMsg(banktypes.ModuleName, banktypes.TypeMsgSend, "skip send vouchers"), nil, nil
}
Expand Down
3 changes: 2 additions & 1 deletion x/campaign/simulation/store.go
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -137,6 +137,7 @@ func GetSharesFromCampaign(r *rand.Rand, ctx sdk.Context, k keeper.Keeper, campI

// GetAccountWithVouchers returns an account that has vouchers for a campaign
func GetAccountWithVouchers(
r *rand.Rand,
ctx sdk.Context,
bk types.BankKeeper,
k keeper.Keeper,
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -179,7 +180,7 @@ func GetAccountWithVouchers(
coinCampID, err := types.VoucherCampaign(coin.Denom)
if err == nil && coinCampID == campID {
// retain a random portion of the balance in the range [0, coin.Amount)
retainAmt := sdk.NewInt(rand.Int63n(coin.Amount.Int64()))
retainAmt := sdk.NewInt(r.Int63n(coin.Amount.Int64()))
giunatale marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
coin.Amount = coin.Amount.Sub(retainAmt)
coins = append(coins, coin)
}
Expand Down
6 changes: 3 additions & 3 deletions x/campaign/simulation/store_test.go
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ func TestGetAccountWithVouchers(t *testing.T) {
}

t.Run("no account", func(t *testing.T) {
_, _, _, found := simcampaign.GetAccountWithVouchers(ctx, tk.BankKeeper, *tk.CampaignKeeper, accs, false)
_, _, _, found := simcampaign.GetAccountWithVouchers(r, ctx, tk.BankKeeper, *tk.CampaignKeeper, accs, false)
require.False(t, found)
})

Expand All @@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ func TestGetAccountWithVouchers(t *testing.T) {
campaign.MainnetID = tk.LaunchKeeper.AppendChain(ctx, chain)
campaign.CampaignID = tk.CampaignKeeper.AppendCampaign(ctx, campaign)
mint(acc.Address, sample.Vouchers(r, campaign.CampaignID))
campID, acc, coins, found := simcampaign.GetAccountWithVouchers(ctx, tk.BankKeeper, *tk.CampaignKeeper, accs, false)
campID, acc, coins, found := simcampaign.GetAccountWithVouchers(r, ctx, tk.BankKeeper, *tk.CampaignKeeper, accs, false)
require.True(t, found)
require.EqualValues(t, campaign.CampaignID, campID)
require.False(t, coins.Empty())
Expand All @@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ func TestGetAccountWithVouchers(t *testing.T) {
campaign.MainnetInitialized = false
campaign.CampaignID = tk.CampaignKeeper.AppendCampaign(ctx, campaign)
mint(acc.Address, sample.Vouchers(r, campaign.CampaignID))
campID, acc, coins, found := simcampaign.GetAccountWithVouchers(ctx, tk.BankKeeper, *tk.CampaignKeeper, accs, true)
campID, acc, coins, found := simcampaign.GetAccountWithVouchers(r, ctx, tk.BankKeeper, *tk.CampaignKeeper, accs, true)
require.True(t, found)
require.EqualValues(t, campaign.CampaignID, campID)
require.False(t, coins.Empty())
Expand Down