feat: Implement peer empty connection

[ivanovpetr]

No description provided.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #822 (0982df7) into develop (8259847) will decrease coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 3.06%.

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop     #822      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    10.51%   10.50%   -0.02%     
===========================================
  Files          332      332              
  Lines        77548    77711     +163     
===========================================
+ Hits          8157     8164       +7     
- Misses       69185    69342     +157     
+ Partials       206      205       -1     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
x/launch/types/genesis_validator.pb.go	0.56% <0.62%> (+0.01%)	⬆️
x/launch/types/peer.go	95.00% <100.00%> (+0.55%)	⬆️
x/campaign/simulation/store.go	84.45% <0.00%> (+1.35%)	⬆️

[lumtis]

I'm trying to figure out if the NodeID, id in Peer, is still necessary for empty connection or if it could be moved into tcpAddress and httpTunnel

The node always has a node ID in the P2P network even if the public address is not exposed. But potentially this information is not necessary on-chain

[ilgooz]

I'm trying to figure out if the NodeID, id in Peer, is still necessary for empty connection or if it could be moved into tcpAddress and httpTunnel

The node always has a node ID in the P2P network even if the public address is not exposed. But potentially this information is not necessary on-chain

Good point, any updates on this?

In such case we don't need this PR, we can just NOT set the peer field in GenesisValidator which makes sense to me.

[lumtis]

Good point, any updates on this?
In such case we don't need this PR, we can just NOT set the peer field in GenesisValidator which makes sense to me.

We let it for now as the Node ID is a general information