-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 56
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Packaging type of artifacts without java files should be pom #519
Comments
ikeyat
changed the title
Packing type of artifacts that have no java files should be pom
Packaging type of artifacts without java files should be pom
Mar 17, 2016
btkadotahr
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 27, 2016
…luna-gfw-security-core] pom.xml. #519
1 task
btkadotahr
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 11, 2016
This was referenced May 11, 2016
yoshikawaa
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 12, 2016
…peAndDependency_master Set 'pom' to Packaging type of artifacts and add 'type' to dependency due #519
2 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Description
Artifacts that are just for managing dependencies of libraries and have no java files should be pom type.
But following artifacts are set as jar type or omitted (default type is pom).
Because of the setting, we have empty jars for them.
Those are not harmful but it is confusing and may increase the cost of management of libraries.
Possible Solutions
Set packaging type as pom.
Affects Version/s
Fix Version/s
Issue Links
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: