chore(ci): clean up workflow names #1433
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Unless we aren't doing Aurora as well, we should probably have Bluefin in the title.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Wouldn't it just be one workflow for both?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Unfortunately no. We have brand_name as an input which is how bluefin or Aurora is decided to be built.
Even as I think about GTS vs Latest, I may have to completely restructure the matrix for the reusable build to handle across versions.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I could possibly look into some sort of matrix option on our current workflow to add coreOS as a build option
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I've gone the merged route so this workflow won't be needed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ok I'll just wait post-coreos kernel and then reapply what makes sense.
dosubot
bot
added
the
size:S
github-merge-queue
bot
removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks
No description provided.