-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 730
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
UserControl code-behind constructor is not called #61
Comments
This issue is actually not a binding issue, but rather a I'll update the issue to reflect the actual problem. WorkaroundIn Level1.xaml.cs, name the first partial void OnInitializeCompleted()
{
root.DataContext = new TestMeModel();
} DetailsCurrently, the constructor of a user controls is not called directly, but rather calls a secondary constructors that allows for skipping the first level of a This Xaml user control interpretation relaxation allowed for richer UIs for those older Android versions, because there were less UI elements in the visual tree, and that we tend not to use code behind as well. To fixAdd a feature flag that disables this behavior, while keeping the call to |
This is a preliminary workaround for #61. This is not enabled by default is may be breaking. The default value will be changed in the future as part of a larger set of breaking changes.
This is a preliminary workaround for #61. This is not enabled by default is may be breaking. The default value will be changed in the future as part of a larger set of breaking changes.
This is a preliminary workaround for #61. This is not enabled by default is may be breaking. The default value will be changed in the future as part of a larger set of breaking changes.
This is a preliminary workaround for #61. This is not enabled by default is may be breaking. The default value will be changed in the future as part of a larger set of breaking changes.
This is a preliminary workaround for #61. This is not enabled by default is may be breaking. The default value will be changed in the future as part of a larger set of breaking changes.
This is a preliminary workaround for #61. This is not enabled by default is may be breaking. The default value will be changed in the future as part of a larger set of breaking changes.
BREAKING CHANGE: This update now forces the materialization of UserControl instances in the visual tree. Fixes #61
BREAKING CHANGE: This update now forces the materialization of UserControl instances in the visual tree. To revert this change, add the following in the csproj: ```xml <UnoSkipUserControlsInVisualTree>true</UnoSkipUserControlsInVisualTree> ``` Fixes #61
BREAKING CHANGE: This update now forces the materialization of UserControl instances in the visual tree. - UserControl no longer incorrectly accepts VisualStateManager, and must be placed on the first child - To restore the skipping of UserControl instances, add the following in the csproj: ```xml <UnoSkipUserControlsInVisualTree>true</UnoSkipUserControlsInVisualTree> ``` Fixes #61
Implemented Android splash screen on old templates.
I have found a issue in the {Binding} system on android.
I created a example under link
The problem is the following.
Usercontrol1 is a parent of Usercontrol2
Usercontrol1 has the Datacontext not set from code behind. (Datacontext == null)
Usercontrol2 has the Datacontext set from code behind.
Binding for sub-controls in Usercontrol2 doesn't work
WORKAROUND:Setting the Datacontext of Usercontrol1 in code behind makes the bindings in Usercontrol2 to work
Workaround (2020-01-20)
Add the following property to all the project heads, in the first
<PropertyGroup>
:This will ensure that the
UserControl
is kept in the visual tree.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: