-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Added UO-ResStock connection variable to the site properties schema #270
Changes from 6 commits
8429ba1
65371bf
8f3ab39
8564ebd
29ec85f
43d1677
3d3b721
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -283,6 +283,18 @@ | |
"ev_curtailment_frac": { | ||
"description": "Fraction between 0 and 1 that denotes curtailment of EV charging load to better align EV charging with expected energy production from a solar PV system", | ||
"type": "number" | ||
}, | ||
"characterize_residential_buildings_from_buildstock_csv":{ | ||
"description" : "Enable UO and ResStock connection to characterize residential buildings by matching them (and their properties) with building from the BuildStock CSV.", | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. For other residential -related field descriptions, we use "Optional for residential buildings" or "Required for residential buildings". For consistency, should we do something similar here? |
||
"type": "boolean" | ||
}, | ||
"resstock_buildstock_csv_path":{ | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I can't remember if we removed conditional requirements from the schema and replaced them with logic in the mapper, but do we somehow want to handle that? For example, if |
||
"description" : "Path to the buildstock CSV that the users want to sample from to find the closest match to their UO residential buildings features.", | ||
"type": "string" | ||
}, | ||
"uo_buildstock_mapping_csv_path":{ | ||
"description" : "Path to the uo_buildstock mapping CSV. IN this CSV users can set a match of the UO features with a buildstock building and its characteristics and the feature will run with the assigned buildstock characteristics", | ||
"type": "string" | ||
} | ||
}, | ||
"required": [ | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why can't the existence of a populated
resstock_buildstock_csv_path
field serve as the boolean here?