Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(main): release 0.30.0 #603

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 20, 2024

Conversation

varfish-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@varfish-bot varfish-bot commented Nov 8, 2024

πŸ€– I have created a release beep boop

0.30.0 (2024-11-20)

⚠ BREAKING CHANGES

Features

Bug Fixes


This PR was generated with Release Please. See documentation.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced new API endpoints: /api/v1/seqvars/csq, /api/v1/strucvars/csq, and genes/transcripts with OpenAPI documentation.
    • Added the "server run" subcommand to the command-line interface.
  • Breaking Changes

    • Source information is now required in the transcript database.
  • Documentation

    • Updated changelog to reflect changes in version 0.30.0, including new features and breaking changes.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 8, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces version 0.30.0 for the mehari package, updating the CHANGELOG.md to document this release and its breaking changes, including the requirement to include source information in the transcript database and the addition of the "server run" subcommand to the command-line interface. The Cargo.toml file is also updated to reflect the new version number while maintaining the existing structure and dependencies.

Changes

File Change Summary
CHANGELOG.md Added new version entry for 0.30.0, detailing breaking changes and new features, including the "server run" subcommand and endpoints /api/v1/seqvars/csq, /api/v1/strucvars/csq, and "genes/transcripts" with OpenAPI documentation, referencing issues #600, #605, #606, #610, #612, and #614.
Cargo.toml Updated version from 0.29.6 to 0.30.0; no changes to dependencies or other configurations.

Possibly related PRs

Poem

🐰 In the meadow, changes bloom,
A new command dispels the gloom.
Version thirty, a leap we take,
With "server run," new paths we make.
Hopping forward, bright and free,
Celebrate with joy, come dance with me! 🌼


πŸ“œ Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

πŸ“₯ Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 008e380 and dcf203b.

β›” Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • Cargo.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
πŸ“’ Files selected for processing (2)
  • CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
  • Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • Cargo.toml
πŸ”‡ Additional comments (3)
CHANGELOG.md (3)

3-5: LGTM! Version entry follows the standard format.

The version entry header is well-formatted with:

  • Proper version number
  • Link to version comparison
  • Release date

6-10: Breaking changes are well documented.

Breaking changes are clearly identified and properly linked to their respective issues and PRs.

Please ensure that:

  1. Documentation is updated to reflect the source information requirement in the transcript database
  2. Users are notified about the new "server run" subcommand in upgrade guides

11-17: Features are well documented with proper references.

Each feature is properly documented with:

  • Clear description
  • Links to related issues and PRs
  • Commit hashes for traceability

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❀️ Share
πŸͺ§ Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 8, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests βœ…

Project coverage is 73.38%. Comparing base (ba15439) to head (92b80d2).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #603   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   73.38%   73.38%           
=======================================
  Files          28       28           
  Lines        9948     9948           
=======================================
  Hits         7300     7300           
  Misses       2648     2648           

β˜” View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
πŸ“’ Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@varfish-bot varfish-bot force-pushed the release-please--branches--main--components--mehari branch from b4b743a to 92b80d2 Compare November 8, 2024 15:36
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
CHANGELOG.md (1)

10-12: Consider if duplicate entries are necessary.

The feature entry duplicates the breaking change entry. While it's not incorrect to list a breaking change in both sections, consider if this duplication adds value or might cause confusion.

πŸ“œ Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

πŸ“₯ Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b4b743a and 92b80d2.

β›” Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • Cargo.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
πŸ“’ Files selected for processing (2)
  • CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
  • Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • Cargo.toml
πŸ”‡ Additional comments (2)
CHANGELOG.md (2)

3-4: LGTM!

The version entry follows the conventional changelog format with proper GitHub compare URL and date formatting.


6-8: LGTM!

Breaking change is properly documented with clear references to the related issue and pull request.

@varfish-bot varfish-bot force-pushed the release-please--branches--main--components--mehari branch 6 times, most recently from 731926c to b090ebe Compare November 11, 2024 13:42
@varfish-bot varfish-bot force-pushed the release-please--branches--main--components--mehari branch 2 times, most recently from 66613c4 to 008e380 Compare November 19, 2024 10:27
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
CHANGELOG.md (1)

3-17: LGTM! Well-structured changelog entry.

The changelog entry follows the conventional commit format, with proper sections for breaking changes and features. All changes are well-documented with issue/PR references and commit hashes.

Consider adding a migration guide section to help users handle the breaking changes:

  • Database schema change for transcript source information
  • CLI interface change with the new "server run" subcommand
πŸ“œ Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

πŸ“₯ Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 66613c4 and 008e380.

β›” Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • Cargo.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
πŸ“’ Files selected for processing (2)
  • CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
  • Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • Cargo.toml

@varfish-bot varfish-bot force-pushed the release-please--branches--main--components--mehari branch from 008e380 to dcf203b Compare November 20, 2024 09:49
@tedil tedil enabled auto-merge (squash) November 20, 2024 09:50
@tedil tedil merged commit 7a7ae99 into main Nov 20, 2024
13 checks passed
@tedil tedil deleted the release-please--branches--main--components--mehari branch November 20, 2024 10:08
@varfish-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

πŸ€– Created releases:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants