Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove licence from all example/package.json that has them #28007

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Aug 14, 2021

Conversation

oBusk
Copy link
Contributor

@oBusk oBusk commented Aug 12, 2021

As mentioned in #27121, the package.json in the examples should not have license field. However in that PR it looks like this particular cleanup was lost in the merge.

This PR

  • Updates the scripts/check-examples.sh script to remove the license field from any example that has it. (3eb57a3)
  • Removes the license field from all examples that currently has it (aa83a34)

@ijjk ijjk added the examples Issue/PR related to examples label Aug 12, 2021
Copy link
Member

@ijjk ijjk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Per #27121 it looks like we want to remove the license field instead of adding it, can we update this to remove it from the examples that do have it?

@oBusk
Copy link
Contributor Author

oBusk commented Aug 14, 2021

@ijjk Cool! I updated the check-examples.sh to remove the license field. A check like this was mentioned as a nice to have, but I don't think there is any that I risk conflicting with right now?

Then I also removed all license from the files that had it (aa83a34).
Looks like there was a commit in #27121 to remove license, but looks like it was lost in the merge?

EDIT: As for the other cleanups mentioned in #27121, I'll go ahead and add checks for that in #28009

@oBusk oBusk changed the title Add licence to all example/package.json that lack them Remove licence from all example/package.json that has them Aug 14, 2021
@ijjk

This comment has been minimized.

@ijjk
Copy link
Member

ijjk commented Aug 14, 2021

A check like this was mentioned as a nice to have, but I don't think there is any that I risk conflicting with right now?

There is not currently a check for this yet so this looks good 👍

Copy link
Member

@ijjk ijjk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@ijjk
Copy link
Member

ijjk commented Aug 14, 2021

Failing test suites

Commit: dc60939

test/integration/build-indicator/test/index.test.js

  • Build Activity Indicator > Enabled > Shows build indicator when page is built from modifying
Expand output

● Build Activity Indicator › Enabled › Shows build indicator when page is built from modifying

expect(received).toBe(expected) // Object.is equality

Expected: true
Received: null

  62 |       const wasVisible = await browser.eval('window.showedBuilder')
  63 |
> 64 |       expect(wasVisible).toBe(true)
     |                          ^
  65 |       await fs.writeFile(pagePath, origContent, 'utf8')
  66 |       await browser.close()
  67 |     })

  at Object.<anonymous> (integration/build-indicator/test/index.test.js:64:26)

@ijjk
Copy link
Member

ijjk commented Aug 14, 2021

Stats from current PR

Default Build (Decrease detected ✓)
General
vercel/next.js canary oBusk/next.js add-licenses-to-examples Change
buildDuration 14.4s 15.2s ⚠️ +816ms
buildDurationCached 3.6s 3.6s -59ms
nodeModulesSize 49.1 MB 49.1 MB
Page Load Tests Overall decrease ⚠️
vercel/next.js canary oBusk/next.js add-licenses-to-examples Change
/ failed reqs 0 0
/ total time (seconds) 2.799 2.865 ⚠️ +0.07
/ avg req/sec 893.07 872.49 ⚠️ -20.58
/error-in-render failed reqs 0 0
/error-in-render total time (seconds) 1.603 1.818 ⚠️ +0.22
/error-in-render avg req/sec 1559.39 1374.95 ⚠️ -184.44
Client Bundles (main, webpack, commons)
vercel/next.js canary oBusk/next.js add-licenses-to-examples Change
745.HASH.js gzip 179 B 179 B
framework-HASH.js gzip 42.2 kB 42.2 kB
main-HASH.js gzip 23.1 kB 23.1 kB
webpack-HASH.js gzip 1.44 kB 1.44 kB
Overall change 67 kB 67 kB
Legacy Client Bundles (polyfills)
vercel/next.js canary oBusk/next.js add-licenses-to-examples Change
polyfills-a4..dd70.js gzip 31 kB 31 kB
Overall change 31 kB 31 kB
Client Pages
vercel/next.js canary oBusk/next.js add-licenses-to-examples Change
_app-HASH.js gzip 980 B 980 B
_error-HASH.js gzip 194 B 194 B
amp-HASH.js gzip 312 B 312 B
css-HASH.js gzip 329 B 329 B
dynamic-HASH.js gzip 2.64 kB 2.64 kB
head-HASH.js gzip 350 B 350 B
hooks-HASH.js gzip 904 B 904 B
image-HASH.js gzip 4.13 kB 4.13 kB
index-HASH.js gzip 261 B 261 B
link-HASH.js gzip 1.66 kB 1.66 kB
routerDirect..HASH.js gzip 319 B 319 B
script-HASH.js gzip 387 B 387 B
withRouter-HASH.js gzip 320 B 320 B
bb14e60e810b..30f.css gzip 125 B 125 B
Overall change 12.9 kB 12.9 kB
Client Build Manifests
vercel/next.js canary oBusk/next.js add-licenses-to-examples Change
_buildManifest.js gzip 491 B 491 B
Overall change 491 B 491 B
Rendered Page Sizes
vercel/next.js canary oBusk/next.js add-licenses-to-examples Change
index.html gzip 540 B 540 B
link.html gzip 552 B 552 B
withRouter.html gzip 532 B 532 B
Overall change 1.62 kB 1.62 kB

Webpack 4 Mode (Increase detected ⚠️)
General
vercel/next.js canary oBusk/next.js add-licenses-to-examples Change
buildDuration 12.2s 11.8s -444ms
buildDurationCached 5.2s 4.9s -308ms
nodeModulesSize 49.1 MB 49.1 MB
Page Load Tests Overall increase ✓
vercel/next.js canary oBusk/next.js add-licenses-to-examples Change
/ failed reqs 0 0
/ total time (seconds) 2.903 2.825 -0.08
/ avg req/sec 861.15 884.82 +23.67
/error-in-render failed reqs 0 0
/error-in-render total time (seconds) 1.885 1.71 -0.18
/error-in-render avg req/sec 1326.15 1461.61 +135.46
Client Bundles (main, webpack, commons)
vercel/next.js canary oBusk/next.js add-licenses-to-examples Change
16.HASH.js gzip 186 B 186 B
677f882d2ed8..HASH.js gzip 14 kB 14 kB
framework.HASH.js gzip 41.9 kB 41.9 kB
main-HASH.js gzip 10.6 kB 10.6 kB
webpack-HASH.js gzip 1.19 kB 1.19 kB
Overall change 67.9 kB 67.9 kB
Legacy Client Bundles (polyfills)
vercel/next.js canary oBusk/next.js add-licenses-to-examples Change
polyfills-a4..dd70.js gzip 31 kB 31 kB
Overall change 31 kB 31 kB
Client Pages
vercel/next.js canary oBusk/next.js add-licenses-to-examples Change
_app-HASH.js gzip 965 B 965 B
_error-HASH.js gzip 3.71 kB 3.71 kB
amp-HASH.js gzip 552 B 552 B
css-HASH.js gzip 333 B 333 B
dynamic-HASH.js gzip 2.83 kB 2.83 kB
head-HASH.js gzip 2.97 kB 2.97 kB
hooks-HASH.js gzip 911 B 911 B
index-HASH.js gzip 231 B 231 B
link-HASH.js gzip 1.64 kB 1.64 kB
routerDirect..HASH.js gzip 298 B 298 B
script-HASH.js gzip 2.95 kB 2.95 kB
withRouter-HASH.js gzip 294 B 294 B
e025d2764813..52f.css gzip 125 B 125 B
Overall change 17.8 kB 17.8 kB
Client Build Manifests
vercel/next.js canary oBusk/next.js add-licenses-to-examples Change
_buildManifest.js gzip 497 B 497 B
Overall change 497 B 497 B
Rendered Page Sizes
vercel/next.js canary oBusk/next.js add-licenses-to-examples Change
index.html gzip 585 B 585 B
link.html gzip 598 B 598 B
withRouter.html gzip 579 B 579 B
Overall change 1.76 kB 1.76 kB
Commit: dc60939

@ijjk ijjk merged commit 077097b into vercel:canary Aug 14, 2021
@oBusk oBusk deleted the add-licenses-to-examples branch August 14, 2021 15:58
@jfeiwell
Copy link

jfeiwell commented Sep 1, 2021

Is this MIT?

@vercel vercel locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 27, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
examples Issue/PR related to examples
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants