Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix intercepted segments with basepath #60485

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 10, 2024

Conversation

vordgi
Copy link
Contributor

@vordgi vordgi commented Jan 10, 2024

Fixing a bug

What?

When basePath is added, intercepted routes stop working correctly.

Why?

For them, basePath was not added at all.

How?

Added basePath to the rewrites for intercepted routes.

Fixes #52624, #58268

@ijjk
Copy link
Member

ijjk commented Jan 10, 2024

Allow CI Workflow Run

  • approve CI run for commit: c6b0ff8

Note: this should only be enabled once the PR is ready to go and can only be enabled by a maintainer

@ijjk
Copy link
Member

ijjk commented Jan 10, 2024

Allow CI Workflow Run

  • approve CI run for commit: c6b0ff8

Note: this should only be enabled once the PR is ready to go and can only be enabled by a maintainer

@vordgi
Copy link
Contributor Author

vordgi commented Jan 10, 2024

I'm looking at the test (test\e2e\app-dir\parallel-routes-and-interception\parallel-routes-and-interception.test.ts) and I think it would be good to run it additionally with basePath option. But it seems like a major overhaul and maybe too much.

Is it worth bothering with this? Or is it better to create another simple test next to it?

@ztanner
Copy link
Member

ztanner commented Jan 10, 2024

Hey @vordgi ! Thanks for the PR. I think making a more specific test for this would make more sense as indeed that one is a bit overloaded currently.

@ztanner ztanner added the CI approved Approve running CI for fork label Jan 10, 2024
@ijjk
Copy link
Member

ijjk commented Jan 10, 2024

Tests Passed

@ijjk
Copy link
Member

ijjk commented Jan 10, 2024

Stats from current PR

Default Build
General Overall increase ⚠️
vercel/next.js canary vordgi/next.js fix-intercepted-segments-with-basepath Change
buildDuration 15.9s 15.8s N/A
buildDurationCached 9s 7.7s N/A
nodeModulesSize 199 MB 199 MB ⚠️ +978 B
nextStartRea..uration (ms) 499ms 497ms N/A
Client Bundles (main, webpack)
vercel/next.js canary vordgi/next.js fix-intercepted-segments-with-basepath Change
193.HASH.js gzip 181 B 182 B N/A
3f784ff6-HASH.js gzip 53.3 kB 53.3 kB N/A
433-HASH.js gzip 28.5 kB 28.6 kB N/A
framework-HASH.js gzip 45.2 kB 45.2 kB
main-app-HASH.js gzip 240 B 242 B N/A
main-HASH.js gzip 31.8 kB 31.8 kB N/A
webpack-HASH.js gzip 1.7 kB 1.7 kB N/A
Overall change 45.2 kB 45.2 kB
Legacy Client Bundles (polyfills)
vercel/next.js canary vordgi/next.js fix-intercepted-segments-with-basepath Change
polyfills-HASH.js gzip 31 kB 31 kB
Overall change 31 kB 31 kB
Client Pages
vercel/next.js canary vordgi/next.js fix-intercepted-segments-with-basepath Change
_app-HASH.js gzip 194 B 195 B N/A
_error-HASH.js gzip 183 B 181 B N/A
amp-HASH.js gzip 504 B 502 B N/A
css-HASH.js gzip 321 B 321 B
dynamic-HASH.js gzip 2.5 kB 2.5 kB N/A
edge-ssr-HASH.js gzip 255 B 253 B N/A
head-HASH.js gzip 350 B 349 B N/A
hooks-HASH.js gzip 369 B 369 B
image-HASH.js gzip 4.28 kB 4.28 kB N/A
index-HASH.js gzip 255 B 256 B N/A
link-HASH.js gzip 2.61 kB 2.61 kB
routerDirect..HASH.js gzip 312 B 311 B N/A
script-HASH.js gzip 385 B 383 B N/A
withRouter-HASH.js gzip 307 B 308 B N/A
1afbb74e6ecf..834.css gzip 106 B 106 B
Overall change 3.4 kB 3.4 kB
Client Build Manifests
vercel/next.js canary vordgi/next.js fix-intercepted-segments-with-basepath Change
_buildManifest.js gzip 483 B 484 B N/A
Overall change 0 B 0 B
Rendered Page Sizes
vercel/next.js canary vordgi/next.js fix-intercepted-segments-with-basepath Change
index.html gzip 528 B 527 B N/A
link.html gzip 541 B 538 B N/A
withRouter.html gzip 524 B 522 B N/A
Overall change 0 B 0 B
Edge SSR bundle Size
vercel/next.js canary vordgi/next.js fix-intercepted-segments-with-basepath Change
edge-ssr.js gzip 93.8 kB 93.8 kB N/A
page.js gzip 148 kB 148 kB N/A
Overall change 0 B 0 B
Middleware size
vercel/next.js canary vordgi/next.js fix-intercepted-segments-with-basepath Change
middleware-b..fest.js gzip 624 B 625 B N/A
middleware-r..fest.js gzip 151 B 151 B
middleware.js gzip 37.5 kB 37.5 kB N/A
edge-runtime..pack.js gzip 1.92 kB 1.92 kB
Overall change 2.07 kB 2.07 kB
Next Runtimes
vercel/next.js canary vordgi/next.js fix-intercepted-segments-with-basepath Change
app-page-exp...dev.js gzip 169 kB 169 kB
app-page-exp..prod.js gzip 95.3 kB 95.3 kB
app-page-tur..prod.js gzip 96 kB 96 kB
app-page-tur..prod.js gzip 90.6 kB 90.6 kB
app-page.run...dev.js gzip 142 kB 142 kB
app-page.run..prod.js gzip 89.9 kB 89.9 kB
app-route-ex...dev.js gzip 24.1 kB 24.1 kB
app-route-ex..prod.js gzip 16.7 kB 16.7 kB
app-route-tu..prod.js gzip 16.7 kB 16.7 kB
app-route-tu..prod.js gzip 16.3 kB 16.3 kB
app-route.ru...dev.js gzip 23.5 kB 23.5 kB
app-route.ru..prod.js gzip 16.3 kB 16.3 kB
pages-api-tu..prod.js gzip 9.38 kB 9.38 kB
pages-api.ru...dev.js gzip 9.65 kB 9.65 kB
pages-api.ru..prod.js gzip 9.37 kB 9.37 kB
pages-turbo...prod.js gzip 21.9 kB 21.9 kB
pages.runtim...dev.js gzip 22.5 kB 22.5 kB
pages.runtim..prod.js gzip 21.9 kB 21.9 kB
server.runti..prod.js gzip 49.5 kB 49.5 kB
Overall change 940 kB 940 kB
Commit: 744c862

@vordgi
Copy link
Contributor Author

vordgi commented Jan 10, 2024

Hi @ztanner
I made a fairly simple test, but I think this will be enough, as adding a basePath is common for all cases.

@vordgi
Copy link
Contributor Author

vordgi commented Jan 10, 2024

Also closes #58268

Copy link
Member

@ztanner ztanner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! 🚀

@ztanner ztanner merged commit ac325df into vercel:canary Jan 10, 2024
66 checks passed
@klarstrup
Copy link

You're a champ Alex!

@vordgi vordgi deleted the fix-intercepted-segments-with-basepath branch January 11, 2024 04:13
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 26, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
CI approved Approve running CI for fork locked type: next
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Intercepting route modal does not work with basepath
4 participants