Enable coveralls . #1596
Closed
Enable coveralls . #1596
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Shylock-Hg
requested review from
yixinglu,
dutor,
laura-ding,
CPWstatic,
dangleptr and
darionyaphet
yixinglu
reviewed
Jan 9, 2020
| - name: Coverage Report | ||
| if: success() && matrix.compiler == 'gcc' && matrix.tag == 'centos7' | ||
| run: cd build && lcov --gcov-tool $GCOV --capture --directory . --output-file coverage.info | ||
| - name: Coveralls |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Could we see the difference result of coverage between PR and master?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Could we see the difference result of coverage between PR and master?
Yes, like this https://github.com/Tencent/rapidjson
This reverts commit a2722bd.
|
Require coverallsapp/github-action#31 |
Shylock-Hg
added
ready-for-testing
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Replace #1410
Why are the changes needed?
The GITHUB_TOKEN can access by the PR from forked repo.
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
NO
How was this patch tested?