Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug/load vf-core version directly from node_modules/vf-core #539

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 30, 2019

Conversation

khawkins98
Copy link
Contributor

This wasn't directly impacting vf-core, but is a config issue in sites that use vf-core as a dependency. In short, it resulted in the vf-core version being reported as the client version.

This doesn't directly impact vf-core, but is a config issue in sites that use vf-core as a dependency. In short, it resulted in the vf-core version being reported as the client version.
@khawkins98 khawkins98 added this to the v2.0.0-beta.3 milestone Aug 30, 2019
@auto-comment
Copy link

auto-comment bot commented Aug 30, 2019

Thank you for requesting a review for this pull request (PR). If you have not done so already - please fill out the PR description with as much context as possible.

If this PR has an associated issue - please add that to the PR description.

Pull request review

Before your PR can be merged in, it will need to be reviewed.

  • add relevant labels to this PR
  • package.json is updated accordingly
  • README.md is filled out with required documentation
  • any .scss files correctly documented
  • a detailed outlin on what this PR is expected to do

@sturobson
Copy link

Do we need to put this config kinda stuff in a separate file away from gulpfile.jstoo?

Now, soon, somewhen in the future?

Copy link

@sturobson sturobson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

leaving you to merge :)

@khawkins98
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yeah, def need to make it re-usable/componentised. Still trying to get a feel for how we should best do it; currently debating:

  1. Just another gulpfile include
  2. Some kind of separate dependency

It's probably #1, I just need to get on it. Would be good to have that done before the demo next week.

@khawkins98 khawkins98 merged commit 53f9126 into develop Aug 30, 2019
@khawkins98 khawkins98 deleted the bug/load-vfcore-version-directly-from-vfcore branch August 30, 2019 09:35
@khawkins98 khawkins98 mentioned this pull request Sep 3, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants