-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 120
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add fixes for getIssuer and getSerial (#15) #138
Conversation
* Add search for commonName in getIssuer * Properly return serial number from _cert in getSerial
Codecov ReportAttention:
❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #138 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 92.97% 92.85% -0.12%
==========================================
Files 16 16
Lines 6007 6019 +12
==========================================
+ Hits 5585 5589 +4
- Misses 422 430 +8
☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Welcome and thanks for your contribution! I will review the code and share some questions or improvements with you. Would be great if you could explain your reasoning behind it and maybe improve parts to help us understand. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the good changes. If you could improve the naming and think about a migration path, that'd be great 👍
… common name is used as a key instead of the serial number
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
All great now, thanks a lot for your time and input!
Hi there, I know this is a pretty old issue so I figured I'd take it up. This is my first contribution to an open source library. :-)
I've added fixes for the getIssuer and getSerial functions in certUtils as requested in #15. It'll no longer be necessary to index directly into
typesAndValues
. Please let me know if there's anything else that I'm missing!