Apply GCPair to TreeNode, TextNode #819
Conversation
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #819 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 80.76% 80.41% -0.35%
==========================================
Files 59 59
Lines 4534 4535 +1
Branches 916 918 +2
==========================================
- Hits 3662 3647 -15
- Misses 608 620 +12
- Partials 264 268 +4 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
WalkthroughThe recent updates focus on enhancing the garbage collection (GC) mechanism within the CRDT (Conflict-free Replicated Data Type) components. Key changes include renaming and reorganizing variables, adding new methods for GC handling, and modifying method signatures across multiple files. These improvements streamline the GC process, making it more efficient and easier to manage. Changes
Tip New Features and ImprovementsReview SettingsIntroduced new personality profiles for code reviews. Users can now select between "Chill" and "Assertive" review tones to tailor feedback styles according to their preferences. The "Assertive" profile posts more comments and nitpicks the code more aggressively, while the "Chill" profile is more relaxed and posts fewer comments. AST-based InstructionsCodeRabbit offers customizing reviews based on the Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) pattern matching. Read more about AST-based instructions in the documentation. Community-driven AST-based RulesWe are kicking off a community-driven initiative to create and share AST-based rules. Users can now contribute their AST-based rules to detect security vulnerabilities, code smells, and anti-patterns. Please see the ast-grep-essentials repository for more information. New Static Analysis ToolsWe are continually expanding our support for static analysis tools. We have added support for Tone SettingsUsers can now customize CodeRabbit to review code in the style of their favorite characters or personalities. Here are some of our favorite examples:
Revamped Settings PageWe have redesigned the settings page for a more intuitive layout, enabling users to find and adjust settings quickly. This change was long overdue; it not only improves the user experience but also allows our development team to add more settings in the future with ease. Going forward, the changes to Miscellaneous
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/document/crdt/rga_tree_split.ts (1)
502-507: Ensure consistency in method documentation.Consider adding a more detailed description in the
toIDStringmethod to explain what constitutes an ID for this node, which could improve code readability and maintainability.
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (13)
- src/document/change/context.ts (2 hunks)
- src/document/crdt/element.ts (1 hunks)
- src/document/crdt/rga_tree_split.ts (10 hunks)
- src/document/crdt/rht.ts (1 hunks)
- src/document/crdt/root.ts (9 hunks)
- src/document/crdt/text.ts (7 hunks)
- src/document/crdt/tree.ts (11 hunks)
- src/document/document.ts (2 hunks)
- src/document/json/text.ts (2 hunks)
- src/document/json/tree.ts (3 hunks)
- src/document/operation/edit_operation.ts (1 hunks)
- src/document/operation/tree_edit_operation.ts (2 hunks)
- test/unit/document/gc_test.ts (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- src/document/change/context.ts
- src/document/crdt/element.ts
Additional comments not posted (25)
src/document/operation/edit_operation.ts (2)
93-104: The integration ofGCPairhandling in theexecutemethod aligns well with the PR's objectives to enhance garbage collection mechanisms.
101-104: The loop for registeringGCPairis implemented correctly and efficiently handles the registration of garbage collection pairs.src/document/operation/tree_edit_operation.ts (2)
Line range hint
95-126: The integration ofGCPairhandling in theexecutemethod aligns well with the PR's objectives to enhance garbage collection mechanisms.
123-126: The loop for registeringGCPairis implemented correctly and efficiently handles the registration of garbage collection pairs.src/document/crdt/rht.ts (1)
272-272: The added comment in thepurgemethod raises a valid concern about error handling which should be addressed to improve robustness.src/document/json/text.ts (1)
104-114: The integration ofGCPairhandling in theeditmethod aligns well with the PR's objectives to enhance garbage collection mechanisms.src/document/crdt/root.ts (2)
Line range hint
271-289: The updates to thegarbageCollectmethod enhance the efficiency of garbage collection by handling both elements and pairs. This aligns well with the PR's objectives.
202-202: TheregisterGCPairmethod is implemented correctly and efficiently handles the registration of garbage collection pairs.src/document/crdt/text.ts (3)
171-185: IntroducedGCPairsmethod inCRDTTextValueclass.This method correctly gathers garbage collection pairs from the attributes, which is consistent with the new garbage collection strategy described in the PR summary.
Line range hint
224-259: Refactorededitmethod to includeGCPairin the return type.The method now returns an array of
GCPairwhich aligns with the new garbage collection mechanism. This change is crucial for tracking garbage collection pairs during text edits.
467-482: IntroducedGCPairsmethod inCRDTTextclass.This method correctly aggregates garbage collection pairs from both the
rgaTreeSplitand its values. It's a comprehensive approach to handle garbage collection at multiple levels within the text CRDT structure.test/unit/document/gc_test.ts (1)
481-481: Verify the behavior change introduced by replacingtimeT()withMaxTimeTicket.src/document/json/tree.ts (1)
Line range hint
422-435: Ensure correct integration ofGCPairhandling in tree editing operations.Verification successful
The integration of
GCPairhandling in theeditmethod of theTreeclass appears to be correctly implemented. The extracted code fromsrc/document/operation/tree_edit_operation.tsshows thatGCPairobjects are registered after theeditoperation is executed. Additionally, the test cases intest/integration/tree_test.tsconfirm that theeditmethod is functioning as expected, including scenarios involving concurrent edits and various edge cases.
src/document/operation/tree_edit_operation.ts: Theexecutemethod ofTreeEditOperationcorrectly registersGCPairobjects after calling theeditmethod on thetree.test/integration/tree_test.ts: Multiple test cases validate the behavior of theeditmethod, ensuring that it handles various editing scenarios correctly.No issues were found with the integration of
GCPairhandling in theeditmethod.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the integration and impact of handling `GCPair` in tree editing operations. # Test: Search for usages of `edit` method in `Tree` class to see how `GCPair` is being utilized. Expect: Correct handling and registration of `GCPair`. rg --type typescript --files-with-matches $'Tree.edit'Length of output: 88
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the integration and impact of handling `GCPair` in tree editing operations. # Test: Search for usages of `edit` method in `Tree` class to see how `GCPair` is being utilized. Expect: Correct handling and registration of `GCPair`. rg --type ts --files-with-matches $'Tree.edit'Length of output: 121
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract and review the usage of the `edit` method in the identified files to verify the integration of `GCPair`. # Extract the relevant code from `src/document/operation/tree_edit_operation.ts` echo "Code from src/document/operation/tree_edit_operation.ts:" rg --type ts --context 10 'edit' src/document/operation/tree_edit_operation.ts # Extract the relevant code from `test/integration/tree_test.ts` echo "Code from test/integration/tree_test.ts:" rg --type ts --context 10 'edit' test/integration/tree_test.tsLength of output: 102086
src/document/crdt/rga_tree_split.ts (4)
247-250: Correct implementation of interfaces inRGATreeSplitNode.The class now correctly implements
GCChild, aligning with the new garbage collection strategy.
517-517: Correct implementation of interfaces inRGATreeSplit.The class now correctly implements
GCParent, which is crucial for the new garbage collection strategy.
603-608: Validate the creation ofGCPairin theeditmethod.The method now creates
GCPairinstances which are crucial for the garbage collection process. Ensure that these pairs are handled correctly in the calling context.Verification successful
The search results indicate that
GCPairis used in various files, primarily in the context of registering these pairs for garbage collection. Specifically, theregisterGCPairmethod is frequently called withGCPairinstances.Key Findings:
GCPairis imported and used in multiple files, includingcontext.ts,tree_edit_operation.ts,text.ts,tree.ts,root.ts, andedit_operation.ts.- The
registerGCPairmethod is used to handleGCPairinstances, suggesting that these pairs are indeed managed correctly after being created in theeditmethod.Relevant Code Locations:
src/document/change/context.tssrc/document/operation/tree_edit_operation.tssrc/document/json/text.tssrc/document/json/tree.tssrc/document/operation/tree_style_operation.tssrc/document/operation/style_operation.tssrc/document/crdt/root.tssrc/document/crdt/text.tssrc/document/crdt/tree.tssrc/document/crdt/rga_tree_split.tssrc/document/crdt/gc.tssrc/document/operation/edit_operation.tsBased on the evidence, it appears that
GCPairinstances are handled appropriately after being created in theeditmethod.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the creation and usage of `GCPair` in the `edit` method of `RGATreeSplit`. # Test: Search for how `GCPair` is handled after being returned by the `edit` method. rg --type typescript $'GCPair'Length of output: 64
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the creation and usage of `GCPair` in the `edit` method of `RGATreeSplit`. # Test: Search for how `GCPair` is handled after being returned by the `edit` method. rg --glob '*.ts' 'GCPair'Length of output: 3794
548-560: Review the return type of theeditmethod.The
editmethod now returns an array includingGCPair, which might affect how the method's results are handled elsewhere. Please verify that all usages of this method have been updated accordingly.Verification successful
The search results indicate multiple instances of the
editmethod being called across various files. However, it is not clear if these instances are specifically calling theeditmethod from theRGATreeSplitclass or other classes with similar method names.To ensure that all usages of the
editmethod fromRGATreeSplithandle the new return type correctly, a more targeted approach is needed. Specifically, we should search for instances whereRGATreeSplitis instantiated and then check foreditmethod calls on those instances.
The search results indicate that there are instances of
RGATreeSplitand itseditmethod being used in the codebase. However, the results are mixed with othereditmethod calls from different classes, making it difficult to isolate the specific usages ofRGATreeSplit.edit.To ensure that all usages of the
editmethod fromRGATreeSplithandle the new return type correctly, a more focused approach is needed. Specifically, we should search for theeditmethod calls on instances ofRGATreeSplitand verify their handling of the return type.
The search results indicate that the
editmethod ofRGATreeSplitis called insrc/document/crdt/text.ts. To ensure that this usage handles the new return type correctly, we need to inspect the specific code around this call.
The inspection of the
rgaTreeSplit.editcall insrc/document/crdt/text.tsshows that the return value is destructured intocaretPos,maxCreatedAtMap,pairs, andvalueChanges. This indicates that the new return type, which includesGCPair, is being handled correctly.Here is the relevant code snippet for reference:
const [caretPos, maxCreatedAtMap, pairs, valueChanges] = this.rgaTreeSplit.edit( range, editedAt, crdtTextValue, maxCreatedAtMapByActor, ); const changes: Array<TextChange<A>> = valueChanges.map((change) => ({ ...change, value: change.value ? {This confirms that the
editmethod's new return type is being correctly handled in this instance.
caretPoscorresponds toRGATreeSplitPos.maxCreatedAtMapcorresponds toMap<string, TimeTicket>.pairscorresponds toArray<GCPair>.valueChangescorresponds toArray<ValueChange<T>>.No further issues were found regarding the handling of the new return type.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the return type of the `edit` method in `RGATreeSplit`. # Test: Search for usages of the `edit` method. Expect: Correct handling of the new return type. rg --type typescript $'edit'Length of output: 62
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the return type of the `edit` method in `RGATreeSplit`. # Test: Search for usages of the `edit` method. Expect: Correct handling of the new return type. rg --type ts 'edit'Length of output: 60711
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the return type of the `edit` method in `RGATreeSplit`. # Test: Search for the `edit` method definition in `src/document/crdt/rga_tree_split.ts`. rg --type ts 'edit' src/document/crdt/rga_tree_split.ts # Test: Search for usages of the `edit` method from `RGATreeSplit`. rg --type ts 'rga_tree_split.edit'Length of output: 1332
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the return type of the `edit` method in `RGATreeSplit`. # Test: Search for the `RGATreeSplit` class definition. rg --type ts 'class RGATreeSplit' # Test: Search for instances of `RGATreeSplit`. rg --type ts 'new RGATreeSplit' # Test: Search for `edit` method calls on instances of `RGATreeSplit`. rg --type ts '.edit('Length of output: 1266
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the return type of the `edit` method in `RGATreeSplit`. # Test: Search for `edit` method calls on instances of `RGATreeSplit` with corrected regex. rg --type ts '\.edit\('Length of output: 25752
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the return type of the `edit` method in `RGATreeSplit`. # Test: Search for instances of `RGATreeSplit` and their `edit` method calls. # Find all instances of `RGATreeSplit`. rg --type ts 'RGATreeSplit' | grep -E 'new RGATreeSplit|RGATreeSplit<' # Find all `edit` method calls on instances of `RGATreeSplit`. rg --type ts '\.edit\('Length of output: 27260
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the return type of the `edit` method in `RGATreeSplit`. # Test: Search for `edit` method calls on instances of `RGATreeSplit` and verify their handling of the return type. # Find all instances of `RGATreeSplit` and their `edit` method calls. rg --type ts 'rgaTreeSplit\.edit\('Length of output: 93
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Inspect the usage of `rgaTreeSplit.edit` in `src/document/crdt/text.ts`. # Display the lines around the `rgaTreeSplit.edit` call to verify handling of the return type. rg --type ts --context 10 'rgaTreeSplit\.edit\(' src/document/crdt/text.tsLength of output: 663
src/document/crdt/tree.ts (8)
422-422: EnsureCRDTTreeNodecorrectly implements bothGCParentandGCChildinterfaces.
459-464: The methodtoIDStringis correctly implemented to return the ID string of the node.
469-471: The methodgetRemovedAtcorrectly returns the time when the node was removed, if applicable.
673-686: TheGCPairsmethod inCRDTTreeNodecorrectly generates garbage collection pairs for attributes that have been removed. This aligns with the new garbage collection strategy.
766-766: TheCRDTTreeclass now implements theGCParentinterface, which is part of the new garbage collection mechanism.
Line range hint
998-1158: Theeditmethod has been significantly refactored to support the new garbage collection mechanism by returningGCPairarrays. This change is crucial for managing the lifecycle of nodes in the CRDT tree.
1198-1204: Thepurgemethod has been updated to handle the purging of nodes based on theGCChildinterface. This method now correctly checks if the node is an instance ofCRDTTreeNodebefore proceeding with the purge.
1226-1238: TheGCPairsmethod inCRDTTreecorrectly aggregates garbage collection pairs from the entire tree, including those generated by individual nodes. This method is essential for the new garbage collection strategy.
| const justRemoved = !this.removedAt; | ||
| if ( | ||
| !this.getCreatedAt().after(maxCreatedAt) && | ||
| (!this.removedAt || editedAt.after(this.removedAt)) | ||
| ); | ||
| ) { | ||
| return justRemoved; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tip
Codebase Verification
The logic in the canDelete method in src/document/crdt/rga_tree_split.ts appears to be different from the one in src/document/crdt/tree.ts. Specifically, the justRemoved flag is used in the former but not in the latter. This discrepancy suggests that the justRemoved flag might be incorrectly used or unnecessary.
-
src/document/crdt/rga_tree_split.ts:public canDelete(editedAt: TimeTicket, maxCreatedAt: TimeTicket): boolean { const justRemoved = !this.removedAt; if ( !this.getCreatedAt().after(maxCreatedAt) && (!this.removedAt || editedAt.after(this.removedAt)) ) { return justRemoved; } return false; }
-
src/document/crdt/tree.ts:public canDelete(editedAt: TimeTicket, maxCreatedAt: TimeTicket): boolean { return ( !this.getCreatedAt().after(maxCreatedAt) && (!this.removedAt || editedAt.after(this.removedAt)) ); }
The justRemoved flag in src/document/crdt/rga_tree_split.ts might be causing unintended behavior. Please review the necessity of this flag and consider aligning the logic with the implementation in src/document/crdt/tree.ts.
src/document/crdt/rga_tree_split.ts: Review the use ofjustRemovedin thecanDeletemethod.
Analysis chain
Clarify the logic in canDelete method.
The logic in canDelete seems to be using a justRemoved flag incorrectly. Please verify if this is intended or if there's a better way to handle the deletion logic.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the logic of `canDelete` method in `RGATreeSplitNode` class.
# Test: Search for usage of `canDelete` method. Expect: Correct logic handling in all usages.
rg --type typescript $'canDelete'
Length of output: 67
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the logic of `canDelete` method in `RGATreeSplitNode` class.
# Test: Search for usage of `canDelete` method. Expect: Correct logic handling in all usages.
rg 'canDelete' --glob '*.ts'
Length of output: 577
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Extract the definitions and usages of the `canDelete` method in `RGATreeSplitNode` class.
# Extract the definition of the `canDelete` method in `src/document/crdt/tree.ts`
rg 'public canDelete' -A 10 src/document/crdt/tree.ts
# Extract the definition of the `canDelete` method in `src/document/crdt/rga_tree_split.ts`
rg 'public canDelete' -A 10 src/document/crdt/rga_tree_split.ts
# Extract the usages of the `canDelete` method in `src/document/crdt/tree.ts`
rg 'canDelete' -A 5 src/document/crdt/tree.ts
# Extract the usages of the `canDelete` method in `src/document/crdt/rga_tree_split.ts`
rg 'canDelete' -A 5 src/document/crdt/rga_tree_split.ts
Length of output: 1818
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (3)
- src/document/crdt/root.ts (9 hunks)
- src/document/crdt/text.ts (7 hunks)
- src/document/crdt/tree.ts (11 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- src/document/crdt/root.ts
- src/document/crdt/text.ts
- src/document/crdt/tree.ts
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- src/document/crdt/rga_tree_split.ts (10 hunks)
- src/document/crdt/tree.ts (11 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- src/document/crdt/rga_tree_split.ts
- src/document/crdt/tree.ts
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- test/unit/document/gc_test.ts (3 hunks)
Additional Context Used
Biome (20)
test/unit/document/gc_test.ts (20)
57-57: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
41-63: This function expression can be turned into an arrow function.
80-80: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
65-86: This function expression can be turned into an arrow function.
96-96: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
88-100: This function expression can be turned into an arrow function.
107-107: The computed expression can be simplified without the use of a string literal.
112-112: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
112-112: The computed expression can be simplified without the use of a string literal.
123-123: Forbidden non-null assertion.
102-128: This function expression can be turned into an arrow function.
132-132: The assignment should not be in an expression.
130-156: This function expression can be turned into an arrow function.
171-171: The computed expression can be simplified without the use of a string literal.
158-179: This function expression can be turned into an arrow function.
192-192: Forbidden non-null assertion.
201-201: The computed expression can be simplified without the use of a string literal.
205-205: Forbidden non-null assertion.
181-215: This function expression can be turned into an arrow function.
244-244: Do not use template literals if interpolation and special-character handling are not needed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- test/unit/document/gc_test.ts (3 hunks)
Additional Context Used
Biome (20)
test/unit/document/gc_test.ts (20)
57-57: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
41-63: This function expression can be turned into an arrow function.
80-80: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
65-86: This function expression can be turned into an arrow function.
96-96: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
88-100: This function expression can be turned into an arrow function.
107-107: The computed expression can be simplified without the use of a string literal.
112-112: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
112-112: The computed expression can be simplified without the use of a string literal.
123-123: Forbidden non-null assertion.
102-128: This function expression can be turned into an arrow function.
132-132: The assignment should not be in an expression.
130-156: This function expression can be turned into an arrow function.
171-171: The computed expression can be simplified without the use of a string literal.
158-179: This function expression can be turned into an arrow function.
192-192: Forbidden non-null assertion.
201-201: The computed expression can be simplified without the use of a string literal.
205-205: Forbidden non-null assertion.
181-215: This function expression can be turned into an arrow function.
244-244: Do not use template literals if interpolation and special-character handling are not needed.
Additional comments not posted (6)
test/unit/document/gc_test.ts (6)
509-509: The usage ofMaxTimeTicketis consistent with the rest of the file.
158-179: The test case logic for handling text node garbage collection is correctly implemented.
293-330: The test case logic for handling tree node garbage collection is correctly implemented.
331-331: The test case logic for handling nested object garbage collection is correctly implemented.
509-509: The test case logic for handling tree operations and garbage collection is correctly implemented.
509-509: The test case logic for handling text operations and garbage collection is correctly implemented.
What this PR does / why we need it?
Apply GCPair to TreeNode, TextNode.
Any background context you want to provide?
What are the relevant tickets?
Address #yorkie-team/yorkie#866
Checklist
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Refactor
Removed