-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[storage.blob] Remove requests as dependency for storage.blob #25017
Conversation
API change check APIView has identified API level changes in this PR and created following API reviews. |
This pull request is protected by Check Enforcer. What is Check Enforcer?Check Enforcer helps ensure all pull requests are covered by at least one check-run (typically an Azure Pipeline). When all check-runs associated with this pull request pass then Check Enforcer itself will pass. Why am I getting this message?You are getting this message because Check Enforcer did not detect any check-runs being associated with this pull request within five minutes. This may indicate that your pull request is not covered by any pipelines and so Check Enforcer is correctly blocking the pull request being merged. What should I do now?If the check-enforcer check-run is not passing and all other check-runs associated with this PR are passing (excluding license-cla) then you could try telling Check Enforcer to evaluate your pull request again. You can do this by adding a comment to this pull request as follows: What if I am onboarding a new service?Often, new services do not have validation pipelines associated with them, in order to bootstrap pipelines for a new service, you can issue the following command as a pull request comment: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM! I see there is one hanging discussion -- if the resolution is to keep it as-is then I would say it is good to merge. If there is still a discussion to be had, Jacob is OOF and will be back after the long weekend + 1 (back online 7/6)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I spoke with Jacob briefly offline -- lets wait until we can have a further discussion next week before merging this in!
…ure-sdk-for-python into fix/storage-requests-dependency
@vincenttran-msft @jalauzon-msft I think I figured out what is going on. In the contentious line of code azure-sdk-for-python/sdk/storage/azure-storage-blob/azure/storage/blob/_download.py Line 46 in b0f9e02
Currently working on tests that confirm that this PR restores the behaviour of the retry mechanism back to #18164's intent. If there is consensus, I will open a PR to revert #25084. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @Stevenjin8 for investigating this further and providing your detailed summary! After seeing your investigation and doing a bit more myself, I think this is a good change.
Just left some minor review comments.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks again for your work on this!
I've approved just pending the discussion on if the test can be recorded.
Description
Similar to #24965. This removes the
requests
import from thestorage.blob
client and (hopefully) fixes the retry mechanism (see comments)All SDK Contribution checklist:
General Guidelines and Best Practices
Testing Guidelines