Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[navigation-refactor] Use minimal action to navigate inside RHP #21067

Merged

Conversation

adamgrzybowski
Copy link
Contributor

@adamgrzybowski adamgrzybowski commented Jun 19, 2023

Details

This PR adds the utility getMinimalAction that is used in LinkTo to fix the issue with back button

Additionally, @WoLewicki came up with the idea that this utility can help to resolve the problem with the RHN animation glitch

Fixed Issues

$ #20620
$ #20621
PROPOSAL: GH_LINK_ISSUE(COMMENT)

Tests

Test for #20620

  1. Click on 'Profile' avatar
  2. Click on 'Security' link
  3. Click on back icon on the top left section of the RHN
  4. Click on 'About' link
  5. Click on the device's back icon on bottom right section
  6. You should be on the settings_root screen

Test for #20621

  1. Open the app
  2. Press CTRL+K to open search
  3. Press CTRL+shift+K to open a new group menu
  4. Do it a few times and check if there are any glitches
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

QA Steps

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
web.mov
Mobile Web - Chrome
androidWeb.mov
Mobile Web - Safari
iosWeb.mov
Desktop
desktop.mov
iOS
ios.mov
Android
android.mov

@adamgrzybowski adamgrzybowski requested a review from a team as a code owner June 19, 2023 18:18
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from abdulrahuman5196 and removed request for a team June 19, 2023 18:18
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jun 19, 2023

@abdulrahuman5196 Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@abdulrahuman5196
Copy link
Contributor

@adamgrzybowski

  1. Kindly add the tests in the author's checklist
  2. Kindly add videos for platforms, currently only web is added. (Even desktop has RHP)

Copy link
Contributor

@mountiny mountiny left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Coupld of comments, lets make sure we include clear testing steps and also fill out all the screen recordings

src/libs/Navigation/linkTo.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/libs/Navigation/linkTo.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/libs/Navigation/linkTo.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/libs/Navigation/linkTo.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/libs/Navigation/linkTo.js Show resolved Hide resolved
src/libs/Navigation/linkTo.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/libs/Navigation/linkTo.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/libs/Navigation/linkTo.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/libs/Navigation/linkTo.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
adamgrzybowski and others added 5 commits June 20, 2023 15:04
Co-authored-by: Vit Horacek <36083550+mountiny@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Vit Horacek <36083550+mountiny@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Vit Horacek <36083550+mountiny@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Vit Horacek <36083550+mountiny@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Vit Horacek <36083550+mountiny@users.noreply.github.com>
@abdulrahuman5196
Copy link
Contributor

@adamgrzybowski Could you kindly check this comment and add tests in author's checklist as well?
#21067 (comment)

And there are still some comments pending to addressed?

@adamgrzybowski
Copy link
Contributor Author

@abdulrahuman5196 I am working currently on the part of the documentation to explain better why we need minimal action. I can see that it may be a little confusing.

I got distracted by other urgent issues. I will get back to this PR right after resolving those problems. Thanks for your patience 🙇 !

@adamgrzybowski
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hey, I updated the docs and included tests, let me know if its any clearer now 😄 @abdulrahuman5196 @mountiny

@abdulrahuman5196
Copy link
Contributor

Sure thank you. Will check on this tonight

@adamgrzybowski
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hey, @abdulrahuman5196 quick sanity check 😄 I can see that the lint step is failing but there is no reason for this in the code. Do you think it's possible there is some problem with github actions?

@abdulrahuman5196
Copy link
Contributor

@adamgrzybowski Seems so. Can you try merge from main?

Copy link
Contributor

@WoLewicki WoLewicki left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added some comments to the md file. Other than that, it looks just fine!

contributingGuides/NAVIGATION.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
contributingGuides/NAVIGATION.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
contributingGuides/NAVIGATION.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
contributingGuides/NAVIGATION.md Show resolved Hide resolved
contributingGuides/NAVIGATION.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@abdulrahuman5196
Copy link
Contributor

I did test the flows by locally changing this #21067 (comment) and the code seems to work fine without any issues.
As the internal engineers commented, the documentation could be improved, since its tricky to follow the code change now and it will become super hard to understand if we look back after sometime. Kindly address the documentation concerns of the internal engineers.
@adamgrzybowski

@adamgrzybowski
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hey, @abdulrahuman5196 I fixed the leftover options and added what @WoLewicki asked for in docs. Can we merge it now?

@abdulrahuman5196
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you @adamgrzybowski . Will work on reviewers checklist and complete it today.

@abdulrahuman5196
Copy link
Contributor

abdulrahuman5196 commented Jun 26, 2023

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
Screen.Recording.2023-06-26.at.11.27.52.PM.mp4
Mobile Web - Chrome
az_recorder_20230626_233717.mp4
Mobile Web - Safari
Untitled.mp4
Desktop
Screen.Recording.2023-06-26.at.11.52.11.PM.mp4
iOS
Screen.Recording.2023-06-26.at.11.40.46.PM.mp4
Android
az_recorder_20230626_234800.mp4

@abdulrahuman5196
Copy link
Contributor

@adamgrzybowski Could you kindly mark the QA steps and Offline tests as "Same as Tests"?

Copy link
Contributor

@abdulrahuman5196 abdulrahuman5196 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changes looks good and works well. Reviewers checklist is also complete.

All yours. @mountiny / @WoLewicki

🎀👀🎀
C+ Reviewed

@abdulrahuman5196
Copy link
Contributor

@mountiny / @WoLewicki Could you kindly check on this ? #21067 (review)
waiting for couple of days

@WoLewicki
Copy link
Contributor

It's fine by me, but I have no power to merge it 😅

@abdulrahuman5196
Copy link
Contributor

OOPS. Sorry. Will wait for mountiny 😶‍🌫️ 😆

@adamgrzybowski
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hey @mountiny it would be great to merge that. There is some code that will be also modified by PR improving resizing

Copy link
Contributor

@mountiny mountiny left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! Also nice description 🙇

@mountiny mountiny merged commit 7e908b1 into Expensify:main Jul 4, 2023
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Jul 4, 2023

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Jul 5, 2023

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 1.3.37-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@bondydaa
Copy link
Contributor

bondydaa commented Jul 5, 2023

looks like this caused a regression here #22289

type: currentAction.type,
payload: {
name: currentAction.payload.params.screen,
params: currentAction.payload.params.params,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
params: currentAction.payload.params.params,
params: currentAction.payload.params.params,
path: currentAction.payload.params.path,

path was missing here and it caused regression - #22308

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@situchan Can you raise a PR fixing this?

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Jul 7, 2023

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/Julesssss in version: 1.3.37-7 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

let currentAction = action;
let currentState = state;
let currentTargetKey = null;
let targetName = null;
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This PR caused a regression, for more details refer this PR

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants