[NO QA]Fix the translation #30335

techievivek · 2023-10-25T12:26:58Z

Details

Updated the translation for the system message that gets shown to payee when we wait for them to enable their wallet.

Fixed Issues

#29430 (comment)
PROPOSAL: N/A

Tests

Login to newDot as a gold wallet user member.
Randomly send money to any other user who is on a silver wallet.
Confirm that you are able to send the money without any issue and the chat report, IOU report and transaction report are all created and rendered correctly.
Login to newDot as silver wallet user and go to the chat report with gold wallet user.
Confirm you can see a preview of the IOU report.
Click on the IOU report preview and you will see a enable wallet button and a system message.
Switch to Spanish language from the preferences settings and confirm the translation is updated.

Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

N/A

QA Steps

N/A

Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
- I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
- I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
- I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
- I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
- I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
- I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
- Android / native
- Android / Chrome
- iOS / native
- iOS / Safari
- MacOS / Chrome / Safari
- MacOS / Desktop
I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
- I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
- I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
- I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
- I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
- If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
- I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
- I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is correct English and approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
- I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
- I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
If a new component is created I verified that:
- A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
- All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
- The file is named correctly
- The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
- The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
- For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
- Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
- All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
- The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
If any new file was added I verified that:
- The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
- A similar style doesn't already exist
- The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

Android: Native

Android: mWeb Chrome

iOS: Native

iOS: mWeb Safari

MacOS: Desktop

melvin-bot · 2023-10-25T12:27:02Z

@ Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

cead22

Why no QA?

allroundexperts · 2023-10-25T23:36:49Z

Reviewer Checklist

I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
- I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
- I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
- I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
- I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
- Android: Native
- Android: mWeb Chrome
- iOS: Native
- iOS: mWeb Safari
- MacOS: Chrome / Safari
- MacOS: Desktop
If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
- I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
- I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
- I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
- I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
- I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
- I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
- I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
- I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
- I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
If a new component is created I verified that:
- A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
- All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
- The file is named correctly
- The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
- The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
- For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
- Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
- All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
- The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
If any new file was added I verified that:
- The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
- A similar style doesn't already exist
- The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web

Mobile Web - Chrome

Mobile Web - Safari

Desktop

iOS

Android

allroundexperts

Looks good!

melvin-bot · 2023-10-26T01:11:56Z

@Julesssss Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

melvin-bot · 2023-10-26T01:11:59Z

🎯 @allroundexperts, thanks for reviewing and testing this PR! 🎉

An E/App issue has been created to issue payment here: #30404.

techievivek · 2023-10-26T06:32:41Z

@cead22

Why no QA?

Only internal employees for now can have a gold wallet and since this was a minor change I added the NO QA label to GH.

techievivek · 2023-10-26T06:35:17Z

@allroundexperts How did you test this? 😕 Do you have a gold wallet set up on your account?

allroundexperts · 2023-10-26T06:36:48Z

@techievivek I manually ran the Onyx.merge setting the payment type to Expensify and actionType as REIMBURSEMENTQUEUED.

Onyx.merge("reportActions_12958560108609", {'2024059139674039010': {
     "originalMessage": {
        "paymentType": "Expensify",
        "type": "pay"
    },
    "actionName": "REIMBURSEMENTQUEUED",
}});

techievivek · 2023-10-26T06:37:13Z

Also, not sure why PR review checklist test is still failing when you have already checked off all the items.

allroundexperts · 2023-10-26T06:37:56Z

Also, not sure why PR review checklist test is still failing when you have already checked off all the items.

You have to delete the in-complete checklist that @cead22 posted earlier. Only then will my checklist be picked up by the automation.

techievivek · 2023-10-26T06:38:17Z

manually ran the Onyx.merge setting the payment type to Expensify and actionType as REIMBURSEMENTQUEUED.

Nice, that's a good one. 👌

techievivek · 2023-10-26T06:38:42Z

You have to delete the in-complete checklist that @cead22 posted earlier. Only then will my checklist be picked up by the automation.

Aaah, I see, I have faced this earlier as well.

OSBotify · 2023-10-26T06:45:12Z

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

OSBotify · 2023-10-26T22:59:59Z

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/techievivek in version: 1.3.92-0 🚀

platform	result
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅

OSBotify · 2023-10-30T07:43:17Z

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/Beamanator in version: 1.3.92-4 🚀

platform	result
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅

OSBotify · 2023-10-30T08:04:17Z

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/techievivek in version: 1.3.93-0 🚀

platform	result
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅

OSBotify · 2023-10-31T21:37:27Z

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/Beamanator in version: 1.3.93-1 🚀

platform	result
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅

fix the translation

0465f60

techievivek requested a review from cead22 October 25, 2023 12:26

techievivek self-assigned this Oct 25, 2023

techievivek requested a review from a team as a code owner October 25, 2023 12:26

melvin-bot bot removed the request for review from a team October 25, 2023 12:27

techievivek mentioned this pull request Oct 25, 2023

[Internal QA] Add enable wallet state button if the submitter hasn't completed the kyc #29430

Merged

59 tasks

cead22 approved these changes Oct 25, 2023

View reviewed changes

allroundexperts approved these changes Oct 26, 2023

View reviewed changes

melvin-bot bot requested a review from Julesssss October 26, 2023 01:11

melvin-bot bot mentioned this pull request Oct 26, 2023

Payment issue for E/App PR#30335 #30404

Closed

Expensify deleted a comment from cead22 Oct 26, 2023

techievivek merged commit 5736941 into main Oct 26, 2023
15 of 16 checks passed

techievivek deleted the techievivek_fix_translation branch October 26, 2023 06:39

OSBotify mentioned this pull request Oct 26, 2023

Deploy Checklist: New Expensify 2023-10-26 #30469

Closed

64 tasks

OSBotify mentioned this pull request Oct 30, 2023

Deploy Checklist: New Expensify 2023-10-30 #30560

Closed

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

[NO QA]Fix the translation #30335

[NO QA]Fix the translation #30335

techievivek commented Oct 25, 2023 •

edited

Loading

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 25, 2023

cead22 left a comment

allroundexperts commented Oct 25, 2023 •

edited

Loading

allroundexperts left a comment

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 26, 2023

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 26, 2023

techievivek commented Oct 26, 2023

techievivek commented Oct 26, 2023

allroundexperts commented Oct 26, 2023 •

edited

Loading

techievivek commented Oct 26, 2023

allroundexperts commented Oct 26, 2023

techievivek commented Oct 26, 2023

techievivek commented Oct 26, 2023

OSBotify commented Oct 26, 2023

OSBotify commented Oct 26, 2023

OSBotify commented Oct 30, 2023

OSBotify commented Oct 30, 2023

OSBotify commented Oct 31, 2023

[NO QA]Fix the translation #30335

[NO QA]Fix the translation #30335

Conversation

techievivek commented Oct 25, 2023 • edited Loading

Details

Fixed Issues

Tests

Offline tests

QA Steps

PR Author Checklist

Screenshots/Videos

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 25, 2023

cead22 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

allroundexperts commented Oct 25, 2023 • edited Loading

Reviewer Checklist

Screenshots/Videos

allroundexperts left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 26, 2023

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 26, 2023

techievivek commented Oct 26, 2023

techievivek commented Oct 26, 2023

allroundexperts commented Oct 26, 2023 • edited Loading

techievivek commented Oct 26, 2023

allroundexperts commented Oct 26, 2023

techievivek commented Oct 26, 2023

techievivek commented Oct 26, 2023

OSBotify commented Oct 26, 2023

OSBotify commented Oct 26, 2023

OSBotify commented Oct 30, 2023

OSBotify commented Oct 30, 2023

OSBotify commented Oct 31, 2023

techievivek commented Oct 25, 2023 •

edited

Loading

allroundexperts commented Oct 25, 2023 •

edited

Loading

allroundexperts commented Oct 26, 2023 •

edited

Loading