-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 248
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
removing benchmarking folder #2769
Conversation
In principle the @KratosMultiphysics/technical-committee agrees with deleting this, but the benchmarking files are still used by the cases in the @KratosMultiphysics/team-maintainers Can each of us check the remaining If it is just a case of removing, I would push the changes to this branch. |
Applications with test examples folders to be updated:
|
At least my test_examples are not related with benchmarking |
@loumalouomega look for |
OK, sorry for the noise |
the convection diffusion application has some bfecc benchmarks that should be working and need to be eventually ported...i would like to ask not to remove those until they are ported |
@RiccardoRossi I checked the bfecc benchmarks, they are not related to the benchmarking There are however some test_examples in the convdiffapp that are using the benchmarking, should those be removed? |
ping @roigcarlo @maceligueta @GuillermoCasas ping @jcotela regarding the incompressible_fluid_app also ping @RiccardoRossi what abt the benchmarks in the |
Test in the mpi_search_application is totally outdated, you can remove it safely |
@roigcarlo as requested I removed the folder |
ping @maceligueta @GuillermoCasas ping @jcotela regarding the incompressible_fluid_app also ping @RiccardoRossi what abt the benchmarks in the structural_application and the OpenCLApplication? |
openclapplication can be removed completely structural_application is pure legacy to me, same as for incompressible_fluid...i simply would not touch them and let the mantainers @vryy @Juliomarti to eventually fix/remove old stuff |
1 similar comment
openclapplication can be removed completely structural_application is pure legacy to me, same as for incompressible_fluid...i simply would not touch them and let the mantainers @vryy @Juliomarti to eventually fix/remove old stuff |
thanks @RiccardoRossi I would say we can go ahead with this If you give me a go then I can remove the OpenCLApp in a separate PR |
+1 for removing opencl (go!)
…On Fri, Oct 12, 2018, 10:49 AM Philipp Bucher ***@***.***> wrote:
thanks @RiccardoRossi <https://github.com/RiccardoRossi>
I would say we can go ahead with this
If you give me a go then I can remove the OpenCLApp in a separate PR
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#2769 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AHr7EUMlH6qqCuO70U96wY5IUCAYr1DPks5ukFeUgaJpZM4WUujd>
.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for cleanup!! 👍
I think that these files are quite outdated
Also I saw several times already that it confuses new users that try to get into Kratos
This is a suggestion, decision is up to you @KratosMultiphysics/technical-committee