Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cosmetic changes to navigator_params #14065

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Cosmetic changes to navigator_params #14065

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

LowOrbitIonCannon
Copy link
Contributor

As per @hamishwillee suggestion from this PR: #13159 .

Maybe we should add, that Unmanned collision avoidance is ONLY and ALWAYS triggered if a UTM_Globalposition message is received.

Eg. the Two Failure Cases:
-Manned aviation that sends UTM_Global_position is detected (as Unmanned)
If it has both Mavlink and ADSB it will be received twice.
-Unmanned aviation that does not send UTM_Global_position is not.
(UTM_Global_Position also needs to be received by mavlink on the Drone)

#13159

dagar
dagar previously approved these changes Jan 30, 2020
@@ -128,28 +128,24 @@ PARAM_DEFINE_FLOAT(NAV_MC_ALT_RAD, 0.8f);
PARAM_DEFINE_INT32(NAV_TRAFF_AVOID, 1);

/**
* Set NAV TRAFFIC AVOID RADIUS MANNED
* Set avoidance radius/distance for manned vehicles (ADS-B/FLARM).
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would keep this relatively short for QGC.

Screenshot from 2020-02-02 12-52-07

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could perhaps change these to

Set ADS-B/FLARM avoidance radius.

and

Set UTM avoidance radius.

The extended description covers the detail.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have no opinion on the optimal solution

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented May 13, 2020

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the stale label May 13, 2020
@dagar
Copy link
Member

dagar commented Aug 18, 2020

Closing because the source branch disappeared (which chokes Jenkins).

@dagar dagar closed this Aug 18, 2020
@stale stale bot removed the stale label Aug 18, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants