-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
boards: enable tinyUSB for boards that use the highlevel_stdio
feature with a single USB interface
#18998
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
7abd2ed
to
cbae692
Compare
#define USB_H_USER_IS_RIOT_INTERNAL | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Out of the scope but why is this needed ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, if the user doesnt define
CONFIG_USB_VIDand
CONFIG_USB_PID, the default RIOT peripheral VID/PID
1209:7d00is used only if
USB_H_USER_IS_RIOT_INTERNALis defined when [sys/include/usb.h](https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/blob/master/sys/include/usb.h) is included. Otherwise the compilation fails with the error message because
CONFIG_USB_VIDand
CONFIG_USB_PID` are used for the device descriptor:
Lines 48 to 56 in df0c04e
#if !(defined(CONFIG_USB_VID) && defined(CONFIG_USB_PID)) | |
#ifdef USB_H_USER_IS_RIOT_INTERNAL | |
#define CONFIG_USB_VID INTERNAL_PERIPHERAL_VID | |
#define CONFIG_USB_PID INTERNAL_PERIPHERAL_PID | |
#else | |
#error Please configure your vendor and product IDs. For development, you may \ | |
set USB_VID=${USB_VID_TESTING} USB_PID=${USB_PID_TESTING}. | |
#endif | |
#endif |
We didn't detect this problem before using tinyUSB in applications other than the tests, because the tests use the test VID/PID.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also the DFU bootloader sets the VID/PID pair.
Murdock results❌ FAILED b2a2e05 boards: enable tinyUSB feature Build failures (1)
Artifacts |
If `TEST_KCONFIG` is set and the board provides the `highlevel_stdio` feature, the `stdio_cdc_acm` module is enabled by default in Kconfig. This setting was previously done unconditionally either by a `.config` file of the board or the bootloader `.config` file (`boards/common/samx1d-arduino-booloader.config`, `nrf52_bootloader.confg`). Changing this approach became necessary to allow enabling other `stdio_*` modules or other USB stacks like tinyUSB for these boards.
Default configuration is now realized in Kconfig files.
cbae692
to
c8a3b73
Compare
This file is not needed any longer with the conditional enable of ´stdio_cdc_acm` and `usbus_*` modules.
Enables the `tinyusb_device` for boards with only one USB interface, where `highlevel_stdio` uses the USBUS CDC ACM interface so far. If any `tinyusb_device` class is enabled the `highlevel_stdio` uses now `stdio_tinyusb_cdc_acm` instead of the USBUS `stdio_cdc_acm`. Therefore, the `tinyusb_device` feature can be enabled now for such boards.
c8a3b73
to
b2a2e05
Compare
@MrKevinWeiss With this PR (commits b362dad, bbe3a9c and 5d52077) I provided a change of the approach of how the unconditional enable of the |
I am in support of dropping the . Can I simplify this as "If I am using STDIO with a board supports TINYUSB and requires the HIGHLEVEL_STDIO then use the TINYUSB implementation for my USB, if there is no TINYUSB implementation then use STDIO_CDC_ACM"? |
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ menuconfig MODULE_USBUS | |||
bool "USB Unified Stack (USBUS)" | |||
depends on TEST_KCONFIG | |||
depends on HAS_PERIPH_USBDEV || MODULE_USBDEV_MOCK | |||
default y if TEST_KCONFIG && HAS_HIGHLEVEL_STDIO && !MODULE_TINYUSB_DEVICE |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I believe the natural way to model two mutually exclusive implementations in Kconfig would be a choice
, like we're doing for stdio
and others. Do you think that would be possible here? This would not scale well when adding additional backends.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I believe the natural way to model two mutually exclusive implementations in Kconfig would be a
choice
.
I agree with this in principle. The problem I see is that USBUS and its device classes are not configured in a separate submenu but are fully integrated into the System
configuration menu. On top level the user can select the USBUS
[ ] USB Unified Stack (USBUS) ----
but if it is selected, the System
configuration menu is extended to
[*] USB Unified Stack (USBUS) --->
[ ] USB CDC ACM support (NEW)
[ ] USB HID support (NEW) ----
and if USB CDC ACM support
is selected the System
configuration menu is further extended to
[*] USB Unified Stack (USBUS) --->
[*] USB CDC ACM support
[ ] USB HID support ----
[ ] Trigger a board reset via USB CDC ACM (NEW)
The tinyUSB configuration on the other hand starts in the Packages
configuration menu, because it is a package. But unlike USBUS, tinyUSB configuration is done completely in separate submenus.
If we want to provide a more natural solution, there should be just an entry like
[ ] USB interface ----
in the System
configuration menu, which should lead to a new submenu where the user first selects the implementation
USB implementation (USBUS) --->
[ ] ...
and all other configurations appear according to the selected implementation. The tinyUSB package would be an hidden option in that case and enabled automatically if tinyUSB implementation is selected.
Right?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That is very true, we should be able to do this with some choice overrides, in which case tinyusb would be a choice. If you don't mind I would like to give an update to the usb modelling a try?
@@ -11,6 +11,8 @@ menu "Standard Input/Output (STDIO)" | |||
choice STDIO_IMPLEMENTATION | |||
bool "STDIO implementation" | |||
default MODULE_STDIO_NATIVE if CPU_ARCH_NATIVE | |||
default MODULE_STDIO_CDC_ACM if TEST_KCONFIG && HAS_HIGHLEVEL_STDIO && !MODULE_TINYUSB_DEVICE |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Checking for TEST_KCONFIG
is not required, as it is inherited from the menu dependency.
I'm wondering whether now, that stdio_cdc_acm
is also implemented by tinyUSB, MODULE_STDIO_CDC_ACM
shouldn't be moved to this file? It could even be made a menuconfig
with a choice
to select the backend (see my other comment on this).
Unfortunatly not 😟 I think the the USBUS SDTIO implementation |
19086: Remodel the USB in Kconfig r=aabadie a=MrKevinWeiss ### Contribution description #### The issues with current architecture Generally there has been some confusion on how to manage KConfig with respect to the board selection of default STDIO backends, specifically for boards that require a USB based backend as there are possible stacks to use. The `<BOARD>.config` way of selecting cannot handle conditional selects. The issues is more with boards such as `esp32s2-wemos-mini`, currently some USB stack will be selected regardless of overridding the preferred STDIO. Selecting a USB stack directly with `STDIO_USB*` creates some circular dependency issues with kconfig and is hard to manage. We also have a mutually exclusive USB stacks, TINYUSB or USBUS which should probably be a choice. #### Desired behaviour 1. Ideally we want a board to default to the most obvious STDIO implementation, for example, if I have nucleo, it uses a UART, for some ESPs, USB is the default way to communicate. 2. These backends could always be overridden though, for example, I may just connect directly to a UART and want my STDIO there, or maybe use a ble based STDIO. 3. The next condition would be specifically for boards with a USB based STDIO. Since we have a TINYUSB stack and a USBUS stack we would want to use the associated STDIO depending on the stack the application selects. 4. However, if nothing is selected by the application, than bring in a USB stack (board based preference) unless there is a specific non-USB based STDIO is selected. For these boards that have this requirement, we DO NOT want to bring in the USB stack if the STDIO is specifically overridden (important for kconfig). #### Update kconfiglib package to RIOT-OS org managed one There is a problem with the upstreamed Kconfiglib implementation and the maintainer is not responsive to the fix. The issue is to do with `menuconfig`s in choices and has been fixed with the RIOT-OS based fork. This PR requires this fix. #### Changes to the USB stack A new entry point is introduced `USB_DEVICE` which indicates wanting a USB device but not caring which stack is used. This allows making a `choice` between the `TINYUSB` and `USBUS` stack allowing mutual exclusivity. Making the USB stack a `choice` means that a specific stack cannot be selected from non-board/non-cpu/non-application based symbols. Thus the `REQUIRES_` design pattern is used for a module to indicate a specific stack should be selected. This is needed for the `MODULE_TINYUSB_NETDEV` in this case. #### Changes to USB STDIO implementations The `MODULE_STDIO_CDC_ACM` and `MODULE_STDIO_TINYUSB_CDC_ACM` are both depends on now, using a `REQUIRES_USB_STDIO` to select the dependencies. This means we do not have to use `select PACKAGE_TINYUSB if TEST_KCONFIG && !MODULE_USBUS` in the board select. ##### Why not just select the USB from STDIO_USB Issue with using select for STDIO choices is that we cannot check which stack we are using to default the STDIO to that, breaking desired behaviour 3. #### The `FORCE_USB_STDIO` Desired behaviour 4 means that we do not want to bring in the USB stack if we override, say, to the UART STDIO backend. Due to the limitations of Kconfig, this is my solution to prevent the USB from being brought in if there is an STDIO that doesn't need it. It is only for the `esp32s2-wemos-mini` board and would not be used in other places and would only need to be explicitly disabled for applications requiring different STDIO backend and no USB. It is not perfect but I think the best solution and fairly understandable... <details><summary><h4>Issues with Kconfig</h4></summary> When using a `choice` and having conditional defaults, for example: ```kconfig choice IMPL default FOO if CHOOSE_FOO default BAR ``` there is a limitation of the level of the level of knowledge that can be expected from Kconfig, a limitation on circular dependencies, and a limitation that the dependencies only get resolved once. For example, if ` BAR` selects something that would eventually select `CHOOSE_FOO`, then the default should be `FOO` and which would no longer select `BAR` preventing the select `CHOOSE_FOO`... Messy stuff and we would want an error saying no no no. What Kconfig cannot handle is something like: ```kconfig choice IMPL bool "Implementation" default FOO if CHOOSE_FOO default BAR config FOO bool "Foo" config BAR bool "Bar" endchoice config CHOOSE_FOO bool config SYMBOL bool select CHOOSE_FOO if !BAR ``` `SYMBOL` causes a circular dependency in Kconfig even though the only possible outcome for the `choice` selection would be static. If we select `BAR` then `CHOOSE_FOO` would not be selected and we stay with `BAR`. If we select `FOO` than `CHOOSE_FOO` will be selected which stays with `FOO`. Everything should be fine, but isn't because Kconfig does not resolve to that degree, it simply sees that there is a dependency of the `IMPL` choice outcome (ie. `if !BAR`) that is a condition for a dependency of the `IMPL` choice selection (ie. ` if CHOOSE_FOO`). This is a limitation of the Kconfig what what makes this problem so challenging, with Make we say "select some sort of USB backend if no other stdio is specifically requested" and it will. </details> An attempt at remodelling the dependencies of the USB stack in Kconfig. Currently there are some issues, especially with the integration of TinyUSB package as a backend. This will require a kconfiglib package fix though... ### Testing procedure `TEST_KCONFIG=1 BOARD=reel make menuconfig -C examples/hello-world` ### Issues/PRs references Requires ulfalizer/Kconfiglib#123 to be merged upstream or fork for RIOT Relates maybe to #18998 and #19038 19672: pkg/micropython: model in Kconfig r=aabadie a=aabadie Co-authored-by: MrKevinWeiss <weiss.kevin604@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Alexandre Abadie <alexandre.abadie@inria.fr>
Contribution description
This PR enables the tinyUSB feature for boards that have a single USB and use the
highlevel_stdio
feature and the USBUS CDC ACM interfacestdio_cdc_acm
.Since the tinyUSB package and the USBUS implementation are not compatible and can't be used simultaneously, the tinyUSB feature wasn't be enabled for boards that have only a single USB and use the
highlevel_stdio
feature and the USBUS CDC ACM interface asstdio
.Now that we also have a
stdio
implementation for the tinyUSB CDC ACM interface (PR #18804), thehighlevel_stdio
feature uses thestdo_tinyusb_cdc_acm
module if any tinyUSB device class and thus the tinyUSB stack is used. The tinyUSB feature can therefore also be enabled for all boards that have only a single USB interface and use thehighlevel_stdio
feature.Testing procedure
Use a board with a single USB interface that uses the
highlevel_stdio
feature and USBUSB CDC ACM, for example:Issues/PRs references
Depends on PR #19006
Depends on PR #19007