[PM-11882] Handled identity item and unsupported items during ProtonPass import.

[aliaftab612]

🎟️ Tracking

#10654

📔 Objective

1. Skipped all items unsupported by Bitwarden during ProtonPass import.
2. Mapped ProtonPass Identity item to Bitwarden Identity.

📸 Screenshots

⏰ Reminders before review

• Contributor guidelines followed
• All formatters and local linters executed and passed
• Written new unit and / or integration tests where applicable
• Protected functional changes with optionality (feature flags)
• Used internationalization (i18n) for all UI strings
• CI builds passed
• Communicated to DevOps any deployment requirements
• Updated any necessary documentation (Confluence, contributing docs) or informed the documentation team

🦮 Reviewer guidelines

• 👍 (:+1:) or similar for great changes
• 📝 (:memo:) or ℹ️ (:information_source:) for notes or general info
• ❓ (:question:) for questions
• 🤔 (:thinking:) or 💭 (:thought_balloon:) for more open inquiry that's not quite a confirmed issue and could potentially benefit from discussion
• 🎨 (:art:) for suggestions / improvements
• ❌ (:x:) or ⚠️ (:warning:) for more significant problems or concerns needing attention
• 🌱 (:seedling:) or ♻️ (:recycle:) for future improvements or indications of technical debt
• ⛏ (:pick:) for minor or nitpick changes

[bitwarden-bot]

Thank you for your contribution! We've added this to our internal Community PR board for review.
ID: PM-11882

[CLAassistant]

All committers have signed the CLA.

[Tyrrrz]

Note that the linked issue mentions:

Skip alias and identity items if it is not handled, and show skipped items count at last.

Unless I'm mistaken, I don't believe this PR introduces a way to track and report the items that were skipped.

Not sure if this is essential though. I believe that introducing it would require changing the whole importer chain and it will affect other providers. @djsmith85 do you have thoughts?

Other than that, I tested the changes in the Web Vault and it seems to work correctly 👍🏻

[Tyrrrz]

Thank you @aliaftab612! I'll wait to clarify a few things with @djsmith85 before proceeding further with this PR 🙂

[djsmith85]

Note that the linked issue mentions:

Skip alias and identity items if it is not handled, and show skipped items count at last.

Unless I'm mistaken, I don't believe this PR introduces a way to track and report the items that were skipped.

Not sure if this is essential though. I believe that introducing it would require changing the whole importer chain and it will affect other providers. @djsmith85 do you have thoughts?

Other than that, I tested the changes in the Web Vault and it seems to work correctly 👍🏻

@Tyrrrz Yes, it does not address showing the skipped items, but I also agree with this being out of scope for this PR.

@aliaftab612 Nice work and thank you for your contribution!

[Tyrrrz]

Moving the PR to QA ✅

[Tyrrrz]

QA passed, merged. Thank you @aliaftab612!