Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

added a space to experience e2e getting sources, making change, and subm... #4

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 15, 2015

Conversation

billchi-ms
Copy link

...itting pull request

jaredpar added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 15, 2015
added a space to experience e2e getting sources, making change, and subm...
@jaredpar jaredpar merged commit 7fed8e8 into dotnet:master Jan 15, 2015
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
README
======

This file is a placeholder. This directory will contain public documentation.
This file is a placeholder. This directory will contain public documentation.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I thought we preferred one space after periods now? We may need to publish a documentation style guide... :)

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, one space after period is clearly superior.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is one space the standard we use in docs? If so then we should undo this.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think we had a standard. @dpoeschl might have been referring to the widely held opinion that double spaces are a holdover from the typewriter days.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If the file is authored in VI, you should use one space after a period. Otherwise two spaces are permissible. This clearly proves that VI is the superior editor. ;-)

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👌

Two spaces after a period is fine in markdown. It improves readability in the raw markdown but will still be rendered as a single space by browsers after being converted to HTML.

Miguel's Markdown Style Guide.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

BUT I LOOK AT THE SOURCE IN VI AND TWO SPACES ARE WRONG.

Pro tip: If you're losing an argument, use all caps. This helps convincing people.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think you've oversold the "pro" in "pro tip"

Oooo! Burn!

Also, you're all jerks. Is this what you're like when there's not enough code to review? Go fix some bugs! 😃 😃 😃

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@billchi-ms
Copy link
Author

Ok, wow, after sending mail to Jared that he could ignore or delete this, and making a painfully clear title, I'm a bit surprised to see our dollars wasted debating this :-). On a serious note, yes, it is a misconception that two spaces after punctuation is silly and out of date. It is a misconception because of what Dustin cites which is true in almost all editors, as well as the fact that some editors have special commands for sentences and paragraphs that leverage this typography. Also, rendering engines that consistently handle whitespace that follows punctuation creates output with lower usability due to eye tracking and visual parsing. Anyway, to say it again, I was simply debugging e2e work flow and tried to pick the most unobservable change I could ... FAIL :-)

@dpoeschl
Copy link
Contributor

Well, if we're stating disclaimers, I should mention that I just wanted an excuse to try out the Pull Request commenting system. 😃

@billchi-ms
Copy link
Author

Nice!! :-) I want a like button on your comment :-)

And we're doing a good job of setting a comfortable tone so that customers don't have to feel all nervous about saying silly stuff here :-)

@jasonmalinowski
Copy link
Member

👍

@theoy theoy added this to the Unknown milestone Jan 16, 2015
OmarTawfik added a commit that referenced this pull request May 18, 2017
* Call this.DeclaringCompilation.EnsureReadOnlyAttributeExists() when needed

* Promote EmbeddedAttribute to be used by both compilers

* Generate Embedded attributes on PE Module Builder

* Thread PEModuleBuilder through Symbol.AddSynthesizedAttributes()

* Fix failing tests

* Base case passing

* Refactor ReadOnlyAttribute to IsReadOnlyAttribute

* Fix build break

* More Tests

* Clean up

* PR Comments #1

PR Comments #3

PR Comments #4

PR Comments #5

PR Comments #6

PR Comments # 7

* Handle NoPIA

Added more tests

* Lambdas and Local functions no longer generate attributes in symbols

Added tests for constructors and operators

Signal need for synthesized attributes in local rewriter for lambdas an local functions

Clean up

* Clean up

* More PR Feedback

* Adding more tests

* More PR Comments

* More tests for explicit interface implementations

* Latest PR Comments

* Moved EnsureIsReadOnlyAttributeExists to AfterAddingTypeMembersChecks

* Fix failing tests
ivanbasov added a commit to ivanbasov/roslyn that referenced this pull request Jan 23, 2018
olegtk pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 16, 2018
genlu referenced this pull request in genlu/roslyn Sep 16, 2019
jnm2 pushed a commit to jnm2/roslyn that referenced this pull request Dec 8, 2019
dibarbet added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 1, 2020
Add ExternalAccess.Razor shims for newly added DocumentPropertiesService APIs.
@jinujoseph jinujoseph mentioned this pull request May 5, 2021
7 tasks
333fred added a commit that referenced this pull request May 24, 2021
…ayer

Simplify migration from EditorFeatures to Features
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants