-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Backports changes from weekly to LTS 2.332 line #248
Conversation
Use rollback instead of rollblack
Remoting releases from older baselines (like stable-4.13.x) need to deliver a signed jar file for compatibility. This pull request changes the default branch used for remoting releases from release.ci.jenkins.io to use the stable-4.13.x branch instead of the master branch. Remoting development on the remoting master branch no longer requires a signed jar file with the removal of Java Web Start in jenkinsci/remoting#532 The release.ci.jenkins.io job that delivers remoting with signed jars is no longer used for releases of the master branch of the remoting repository. This change should allow us to deliver remoting 4.13.1. Remoting releases from the master branch will continue to use JEP-229 as was done for https://github.com/jenkinsci/remoting/releases/tag/3020.vcc32c3b_cc767
…4.13.x-branch Release signed remoting from stable-4.13.x branch, not master branch
Co-authored-by: GitHub Actions <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Hervé Le Meur <91831478+lemeurherve@users.noreply.github.com>
…ava` binary - jenkins-infra/docker-packaging#36 removed JDK8 and changed the `JAVA_HOME` value - #237 and #232 changed the Docker image but we forgot to update the pod config
fix(release) Rely on the Docker image `PATH` to locate the default `java` binary
Ref. openssl/openssl#11672. This is a short-term measure to fix the weekly release process.
fix(release) use openssl legacy provider for pkcs12
Display Maven version information without stopping build
…i/... ... jenkins-infra/release/PodTemplates.d/release-linux.yaml" Made with ❤️️ by updatecli
…i/... ... jenkins-infra/release/PodTemplates.d/release-linux.yaml" Made with ❤️️ by updatecli
…dbba8951cba27b0e8393f6419e599b857c5fa2ca3f32a917 [updatecli] Bump jenkinsciinfra/packaging Docker image version to 2.1.40
…i/... ... jenkins-infra/release/PodTemplates.d/package-linux.yaml" Made with ❤️️ by updatecli
…i/... ... jenkins-infra/release/PodTemplates.d/package-linux.yaml" Made with ❤️️ by updatecli
chore(Jenkinsfiles) remove deprecated label directive for kubernetes agent definitions
…dbba8951cba27b0e8393f6419e599b857c5fa2ca3f32a917 [updatecli] Bump jenkinsciinfra/packaging Docker image version
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Wouldn't it make more sense to merge these changes into stable-2.346
? There is no further point release of 2.332 which would utilize the changes.
Absolutely: a twin PR is needed for that. Thanks for pointing that: I'm always lost in "which branch is which what". However we still need this PR to ensure that any security release that would fork from the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There will be one more security release of this line so sure makes sense
packaging branch will also need merging then
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There will be one more security release of this line so sure makes sense
Then we definitely want this here too 👍🏻
I'm not aware of any |
@@ -7,15 +7,13 @@ metadata: | |||
spec: | |||
containers: | |||
- name: jnlp | |||
image: jenkinsciinfra/packaging:2.1.9 | |||
image: jenkinsciinfra/packaging:2.1.41 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
needs a backport of jenkinsci/jenkins#6628 to 2.332 and 2.346
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could this change be (partially) reverted instead?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
packaging branch will also need merging then
I'm not aware of any
packaging
branch, what are you refering to?
https://github.com/jenkinsci/packaging/branches
Could this change be (partially) reverted instead?
Yes it would just need this version bump reverted
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hop: #252
After jenkins-infra/helpdesk#2978 , safer to immediatly transplant all the changes to the LTS baseline.