-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
destruct aiderCommand and buffer object, use import as instead #21
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve a significant restructuring of the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
denops/aider/aiderCommand.ts (3)
10-16
: LGTM: Correct implementation with proper type checking.The
run
function correctly retrieves the Aider command and executes it in a terminal. The use ofensure
andis.String
for type checking is a good practice.Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of this function for better documentation.
46-55
: LGTM with suggestions: Consider error handling and abstraction.The
sendPrompt
function is well-documented and implements the described behavior correctly. However, there are a few points to consider:
- Error handling: Consider adding try-catch blocks to handle potential errors when interacting with Vim.
- Abstraction: The function uses Vim-specific commands directly. It might be beneficial to abstract these into helper functions for better maintainability.
Consider refactoring the function to include error handling and abstract Vim-specific operations:
export async function sendPrompt( denops: Denops, jobId: number, prompt: string, ): Promise<void> { try { await setRegister(denops, 'q', prompt); await moveCursorToEnd(denops); await pasteRegister(denops, 'q'); await sendToJob(denops, jobId, '\n'); } catch (error) { console.error('Error sending prompt:', error); // Handle the error appropriately } } // Helper functions (to be implemented) async function setRegister(denops: Denops, register: string, content: string): Promise<void> { // Implementation } async function moveCursorToEnd(denops: Denops): Promise<void> { // Implementation } async function pasteRegister(denops: Denops, register: string): Promise<void> { // Implementation } async function sendToJob(denops: Denops, jobId: number, content: string): Promise<void> { // Implementation }
57-60
: LGTM with suggestions: Add error handling and documentation.The
exit
function correctly sends the exit command to Aider and closes the buffer. However, there are a few improvements that could be made:
- Error handling: Add try-catch blocks to handle potential errors when sending commands or closing buffers.
- Documentation: Add a JSDoc comment explaining the function's purpose and parameters.
Consider refactoring the function as follows:
/** * Exits the Aider session and closes its buffer. * @param {Denops} denops - Denops instance * @param {number} jobId - The job id of the Aider session * @param {number} bufnr - The buffer number of the Aider session * @returns {Promise<void>} */ export async function exit(denops: Denops, jobId: number, bufnr: number): Promise<void> { try { await denops.call("chansend", jobId, "/exit\n"); await denops.cmd(`bdelete! ${bufnr}`); } catch (error) { console.error('Error exiting Aider session:', error); // Handle the error appropriately, maybe attempt to force quit? } }denops/aider/buffer.ts (1)
198-219
: Standardize comments to a single languageThe comments in this section are written in Japanese. For consistency and maintainability across the codebase, consider translating comments into English or choosing a single language for all code comments.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- denops/aider/aiderCommand.ts (1 hunks)
- denops/aider/buffer.ts (3 hunks)
- denops/aider/main.ts (1 hunks)
- denops/aider/utils.ts (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- denops/aider/utils.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
denops/aider/buffer.ts
[error] 63-63: void is confusing inside a union type.
Unsafe fix: Use undefined instead.
(lint/suspicious/noConfusingVoidType)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
denops/aider/aiderCommand.ts (3)
6-8
: LGTM: Simple and clear implementation.The
debug
function is concise and performs its intended task of switching to the previous buffer.
25-37
: LGTM: Well-documented and correctly implemented.The
silentRun
function is well-documented with a clear JSDoc comment. The implementation matches the described behavior, creating a new buffer for Aider to run in the background and then returning to the previous buffer. The use ofensure
andis.String
for type checking is consistent with other functions.
Line range hint
1-60
: Overall assessment: Successful refactoring with minor improvement suggestions.The changes in this file successfully achieve the PR objective of exporting individual functions instead of wrapping them in an object. This refactoring improves the module structure and aligns with modern JavaScript/TypeScript practices. The new structure will make it easier to import specific functions and should reduce unnecessary diffs during future refactoring.
Key points:
- All functions (
debug
,run
,silentRun
,sendPrompt
, andexit
) are now exported individually.- The internal logic of each function remains unchanged, maintaining existing functionality.
- Type checking and error handling are generally well-implemented, with some room for improvement in certain functions.
Suggestions for further improvement:
- Consider adding or improving error handling in functions like
sendPrompt
andexit
.- Ensure consistent documentation across all functions, possibly adding JSDoc comments where missing.
- Consider abstracting Vim-specific operations into helper functions for better maintainability.
Overall, this refactoring is a positive change that improves the code structure and maintainability.
denops/aider/main.ts (4)
3-5
: Improved import structure aligns with PR objectives.The changes to the import statements for
aiderCommand
andbuffer
align well with the PR objectives. By usingimport * as
instead of destructuring imports, you've made the code more resilient to future changes in the imported modules. This approach will indeed reduce unnecessary differences during refactoring, as mentioned in the PR summary.These changes allow for more flexible usage of the imported modules and make it easier to add or remove exported items from these modules without affecting this file.
Line range hint
1-247
: Summary of changes and next stepsThe changes to the import statements in this file are a good start towards the PR's objective of refactoring how
aiderCommand
andbuffer
objects are exported and used. However, the refactoring is incomplete, as the usage of these modules throughout the file hasn't been updated to match the new import style.To complete this refactoring:
- Update all usages of
aiderCommand
andbuffer
functions to use the new module-prefixed style.- Consider updating the
BufferLayout
import for consistency.- After making these changes, thoroughly test the plugin to ensure no runtime errors are introduced.
These steps will ensure that the refactoring is complete and that the code remains functional while achieving the goal of reducing unnecessary differences during future refactoring processes.
5-5
: Consider importing BufferLayout from the buffer module.The
BufferLayout
type is still imported separately from thebuffer
module. For consistency with the new import style and to potentially simplify imports, consider importingBufferLayout
from thebuffer
module if it's exported from there.You could update the import statement as follows:
import * as buffer from "./buffer.ts";Then, use
buffer.BufferLayout
instead of justBufferLayout
in the code. This change would make the imports more consistent and potentially simplify future refactoring.To check if
BufferLayout
is exported from thebuffer
module, you can run:#!/bin/bash # Check if BufferLayout is exported from buffer.ts rg --type typescript 'export.*BufferLayout' denops/aider/buffer.tsIf the script returns a result, it confirms that
BufferLayout
is exported frombuffer.ts
and can be accessed through thebuffer
import.
Line range hint
11-247
: Update usage of imported modules to match new import style.While the import statements have been updated, the usage of the imported modules in the rest of the code hasn't been modified to reflect this change. This inconsistency may lead to runtime errors.
For example, direct usage of
aiderCommand
andbuffer
functions should now be prefixed with the module name.Please update the usage of these modules throughout the code. Here are a few examples of changes you'll need to make:
- await buffer.sendPromptByBuffer(denops, openBufferType), + await buffer.buffer.sendPromptByBuffer(denops, openBufferType), - await aiderCommand.run(denops); + await aiderCommand.aiderCommand.run(denops); - await buffer.openAiderBuffer(denops, openBufferType) + await buffer.buffer.openAiderBuffer(denops, openBufferType)Make sure to apply similar changes throughout the file wherever
aiderCommand
andbuffer
are used.To help identify all instances where these changes are needed, you can run the following script:
This will help ensure that all usages are updated correctly.
export async function openSplitWindow(denops: Denops): Promise<void> { | ||
await denops.cmd(await getOpenBufferType(denops)); | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ensure 'openSplitWindow' executes valid Vim commands
In the openSplitWindow
function, await denops.cmd(await getOpenBufferType(denops));
may attempt to execute an invalid command if openBufferType
is "floating"
. Since "floating"
is not a valid Vim command, this could lead to runtime errors. Ensure that only valid commands are executed.
Apply this diff to fix the issue:
export async function openSplitWindow(denops: Denops): Promise<void> {
- await denops.cmd(await getOpenBufferType(denops));
+ const openBufferType = await getOpenBufferType(denops);
+ if (openBufferType === "split" || openBufferType === "vsplit") {
+ await denops.cmd(openBufferType);
+ } else {
+ // Handle the "floating" case appropriately, e.g., open a floating window or default to a split.
+ await openFloatingWindow(denops, await getAiderBufferNr(denops));
+ }
}
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
( ;´ワ `;)つLGTM
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores