refactor openAiderBuffer, small fix getAiderBuffer #24
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant changes to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
| { | ||
| silent: true, | ||
| }, | ||
| ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
biomeデフォルトの80文字/行でformatさせると改行増えすぎるなあという気持ち
There was a problem hiding this comment.
biome教に殉じるか、設定増やすかですねえ。
（ ；´。 ｀；）←ここはあまりこだわりがないので、多くてもまぁええか…となっていた顔
ですが、80文字ってモニタの解像度が小さなときの時代のルールなので、120文字くらいまでは増やしてもよさそうです。
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
denops/aider/main.ts (3)
Line range hint
126-130: LGTM: Simplified implementation of theaddCurrentFilecommand.The change aligns with the PR objectives by streamlining the code and removing the conditional check for
aiderBuf. The behavior remains consistent: if the Aider buffer doesn't exist, it's opened before adding the current file.Consider improving the user experience by automatically re-running the command after opening the buffer, instead of asking the user to run it again. This could be achieved by recursively calling the function or using a flag to indicate that the buffer has just been opened.
Line range hint
157-161: LGTM: Simplified implementation of theaddCurrentFileReadOnlycommand.The change aligns with the PR objectives by streamlining the code and removing the conditional check for
aiderBuf. The behavior remains consistent: if the Aider buffer doesn't exist, it's opened before adding the current file as read-only.Similar to the
addCurrentFilecommand, consider improving the user experience by automatically re-running the command after opening the buffer, instead of asking the user to run it again. This could be achieved by recursively calling the function or using a flag to indicate that the buffer has just been opened.
Line range hint
95-161: Overall: Good refactoring, consider further UX improvements.The changes consistently simplify the implementation of commands by removing checks for
aiderBuf, which aligns well with the PR objectives. The code is more streamlined and easier to maintain.Consider implementing a helper function to handle the common pattern of "open buffer if it doesn't exist, then perform action". This could improve code reusability and make it easier to automatically re-run commands after opening the buffer. For example:
async function ensureAiderBufferOpen(denops: Denops, openBufferType: BufferLayout, action: () => Promise<void>): Promise<void> { if ((await buffer.getAiderBuffer(denops)) === undefined) { await buffer.openAiderBuffer(denops, openBufferType); if (openBufferType !== "floating") { await denops.cmd("wincmd p"); } } await action(); }This function could then be used in the
addCurrentFileandaddCurrentFileReadOnlycommands to simplify the logic and ensure the action is always performed after the buffer is opened.
| await aider().run(denops); | ||
| return; | ||
| } | ||
| await buffer.openAiderBuffer(denops, openBufferType); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Action Required: Remaining usages of aiderBuf found in the codebase.
The search revealed that aiderBuf is still used in denops/aider/bufferOperation.ts at multiple locations. Please review and refactor these instances to ensure complete removal or proper handling as per the PR objectives.
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM: Simplified implementation of the run command.
The change directly calls openAiderBuffer without checking for the existence of aiderBuf, which aligns with the PR objectives of removing the aiderBuf argument and streamlining the code.
To ensure this change doesn't introduce any regressions, let's verify that aiderBuf is not used elsewhere in the codebase:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining usage of 'aiderBuf' in the codebase
# Test: Search for 'aiderBuf' in all TypeScript files
rg --type typescript 'aiderBuf'
Length of output: 66
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining usage of 'aiderBuf' in TypeScript files
# Test: Search for 'aiderBuf' in all TypeScript files using the correct type alias
rg --type ts 'aiderBuf'
Length of output: 1323
| ): Promise<void> { | ||
| const aiderBuf = await getAiderBuffer(denops); | ||
| if (openBufferType === "floating") { | ||
| if (aiderBuf === undefined) { | ||
| const bufnr = ensure( | ||
| await n.nvim_create_buf(denops, false, true), | ||
| is.Number, | ||
| ); | ||
| await openFloatingWindow(denops, bufnr); | ||
| await aider().run(denops); | ||
| return; | ||
| } | ||
| if (aiderBuf !== undefined) { | ||
| await openFloatingWindow(denops, aiderBuf.bufnr); | ||
| return; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify conditional logic in 'openAiderBuffer' function
After checking if (aiderBuf === undefined) and returning, the subsequent check if (aiderBuf !== undefined) is redundant and can be replaced with an else statement for improved readability.
Apply this diff to simplify the conditional logic:
if (openBufferType === "floating") {
if (aiderBuf === undefined) {
// ... existing code ...
return;
- }
- if (aiderBuf !== undefined) {
+ } else {
await openFloatingWindow(denops, aiderBuf.bufnr);
return;
}
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| ): Promise<void> { | |
| const aiderBuf = await getAiderBuffer(denops); | |
| if (openBufferType === "floating") { | |
| if (aiderBuf === undefined) { | |
| const bufnr = ensure( | |
| await n.nvim_create_buf(denops, false, true), | |
| is.Number, | |
| ); | |
| await openFloatingWindow(denops, bufnr); | |
| await aider().run(denops); | |
| return; | |
| } | |
| if (aiderBuf !== undefined) { | |
| await openFloatingWindow(denops, aiderBuf.bufnr); | |
| return; | |
| } | |
| ): Promise<void> { | |
| const aiderBuf = await getAiderBuffer(denops); | |
| if (openBufferType === "floating") { | |
| if (aiderBuf === undefined) { | |
| const bufnr = ensure( | |
| await n.nvim_create_buf(denops, false, true), | |
| is.Number, | |
| ); | |
| await openFloatingWindow(denops, bufnr); | |
| await aider().run(denops); | |
| return; | |
| } else { | |
| await openFloatingWindow(denops, aiderBuf.bufnr); | |
| return; | |
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
biomeくんがelseを消そうとするんじゃ
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@tsukimizake、ご指摘ありがとうございます。Biomeがelseを削除するとのこと、承知しました。それではこのままにしておきます。
／(=´x`=)＼
✏️ Learnings added
Learnt from: tsukimizake
PR: nekowasabi/aider.vim#24
File: denops/aider/bufferOperation.ts:58-73
Timestamp: 2024-10-10T13:35:53.623Z
Learning: このTypeScriptコードでは、`if`ブロック内で`return`がある場合、その後の`else`文は使用しません。Biomeが自動的に削除するためです。
Note: Learnings are effective only in the context of similar code segments. To apply general coding guidelines, please configure review instructions. You can manage existing learnings in the app.
|
LGTM!! |
Summary by CodeRabbit