Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

linkedlist: remove unused methods #11726

Closed

Conversation

mscdex
Copy link
Contributor

@mscdex mscdex commented Mar 7, 2017

This should probably only land once lib/_linklist.js is removed to avoid any breakage. Since that private module has been (runtime) deprecated since v5.0.0, should it finally be removed in v8.0.0? If not, I can mark this as 'in progress' or similar until it is removed. Thoughts @nodejs/ctc?

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/6736/

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • commit message follows commit guidelines
Affected core subsystem(s)
  • lib/src

@mscdex mscdex added lib / src Issues and PRs related to general changes in the lib or src directory. semver-major PRs that contain breaking changes and should be released in the next major version. labels Mar 7, 2017
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the timers Issues and PRs related to the timers subsystem / setImmediate, setInterval, setTimeout. label Mar 7, 2017
@mscdex mscdex removed the timers Issues and PRs related to the timers subsystem / setImmediate, setInterval, setTimeout. label Mar 7, 2017
Copy link
Member

@indutny indutny left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, as long as CI is happy.

@sam-github
Copy link
Contributor

I think the entire module should be removed, as you say, its been runtime deprecated since 5.x, 8.x is a good time to remove it.

@jasnell
Copy link
Member

jasnell commented Mar 7, 2017

@ChALkeR ... can you check to see if there is any ecosystem usage of _linked_list remaining? I'm +1 to removing it so long as it doesn't break anything (keeping in mind, of course, the fact that a stub should remain in order to keep malicious userland folks from jumping on the name)

Copy link
Contributor

@cjihrig cjihrig left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM if the ecosystem is not using it. I'd also be +1 to removing it completely if it's not being used.

@mscdex mscdex added this to the 8.0.0 milestone Mar 14, 2017
@mscdex
Copy link
Contributor Author

mscdex commented Mar 21, 2017

@rvagg
Copy link
Member

rvagg commented Mar 22, 2017

lgtm

@mscdex
Copy link
Contributor Author

mscdex commented Mar 22, 2017

To those who approved this.... is that an approval of this PR as-is or approval of just removing the module entirely? @indutny @cjihrig @jasnell @rvagg

@jasnell
Copy link
Member

jasnell commented Mar 22, 2017 via email

@cjihrig
Copy link
Contributor

cjihrig commented Mar 22, 2017

What @jasnell said.

@mscdex
Copy link
Contributor Author

mscdex commented Mar 29, 2017

I've decided to do the _linklist removal separately in #12113. I can combine these two if there is interest in doing so.

jasnell pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 4, 2017
PR-URL: #11726
Reviewed-By: Fedor Indutny <fedor.indutny@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <rod@vagg.org>
@jasnell
Copy link
Member

jasnell commented Apr 4, 2017

Landed in b40dab5

@jasnell jasnell closed this Apr 4, 2017
@mscdex mscdex deleted the linkedlist-remove-unused-methods branch April 4, 2017 20:09
@jasnell jasnell mentioned this pull request Apr 4, 2017
@Trott Trott removed the ctc-review label Apr 6, 2017
@ChALkeR
Copy link
Member

ChALkeR commented May 4, 2017

Sorry, it looks like I forgot this one.

It's completely ok to change, the public version of the module have been runtime-deprecated in #3078 and removed in #12113. The (old) usage data is at #3078 (comment) and was about 17 packages.

Copy link
Member

@ChALkeR ChALkeR left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Late LGTM :-)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lib / src Issues and PRs related to general changes in the lib or src directory. semver-major PRs that contain breaking changes and should be released in the next major version.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants