-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[v12.x] deps: V8: backport 3f071e3e7e15 #35038
Conversation
In the termination case, we should not crash. There’s also no harm being done by ignoring the termination exception here, since the thread is about to be torn down anyway. Also, add a guard against running this during shutdown. That is the likely cause of #34361. Fixes: #34361 PR-URL: #34362 Fixes: #27261 Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host> Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
destroy(err) on http response will propagate the error to the request causing 'error' to be unexpectedly emitted. Furthermore, response.destroy() unlike request.abort() does not _dump buffered data. Fixes a breaking change introduced in 6480882. Prefer res.req.abort() over res.destroy() until this situation is clarified. Fixes: #31029 Refs: 6480882 PR-URL: #31054 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Stephen Belanger <admin@stephenbelanger.com> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Don't throw errors on Uint8Arrays and added test for all valid types. Backport-PR-URL: #33488 PR-URL: #33155 Fixes: #33379 Refs: #29829 Reviewed-By: Robert Nagy <ronagy@icloud.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Zeyu Yang <himself65@outlook.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
For keep-alive connections, the headersTimeout may fire during subsequent request because the measurement was reset after a request and not before a request. Backport-PR-URL: #34131 PR-URL: #32329 Fixes: #27363 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Original commit message: [mips] Use t9 as the function call register. on mips, we should use t9 when jump to a ExternalReference, because the callee function will consider t9 as the function start address. Change-Id: I56e2bf073fd24b2f3434dfd255d48264bfd0b2cd Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1826417 Auto-Submit: Yu Yin <xwafish@gmail.com> Commit-Queue: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63988} Refs: v8/v8@7889803 PR-URL: #34214 Fixes: #33703 Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Beth Griggs <Bethany.Griggs@uk.ibm.com>
This feature does not work when a module is imported using ECMAScript modules specification, therefore it is deprecated. Fixes: nodejs/modules#469 PR-URL: #32217 Backport-PR-URL: #34592 Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host> Reviewed-By: Bradley Farias <bradley.meck@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
729799d
to
c9bd1a7
Compare
@miladfarca Could you rebase this ontop of the current v12.x-staging branch please? |
Original commit message: PPC: Optimize clearing higher bits of mulhw/mulhwu Change-Id: Ie3e14a6ef4531349e81a8ae741bc7470c7e547ca Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2349468 Reviewed-by: Junliang Yan <jyan@ca.ibm.com> Commit-Queue: Milad Farazmand <miladfar@ca.ibm.com> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69343} Refs: v8/v8@3f071e3
@richardlau It's rebased ontop of the current v12.x-staging. |
be41c83
to
efb5192
Compare
@miladfarca It looks like it’s been merged instead of rebased? We can’t run CI on PRs with merge commits, unfortunately |
I've created this fresh PR: #35305 |
Original commit message:
Refs: v8/v8@3f071e3
Checklist
make -j4 test
(UNIX), orvcbuild test
(Windows) passes