-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 127
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Keyboard-friendly List Virtualization Behavior #335
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
VirtualizedList virtualizes away items based on proximity to the lists viewport, without consideration for other features such as focus or selection. This strategy limits the ability to correctly implement some common keyboard interactions. This especially impacts desktop platforms (react-native-web, react-native-windows, react-native-macos), but also impacts the tablet with keyboard form-factor on iPadOS/Android. This proposal outlines these issues, proposing a set of behavior changes and new APIs to address them. It does not address concrete implementation.
This has some intersection with existing functionality, where users can mark |
See react-native-community/discussions-and-proposals#335 for extra context. A VirtualizedList may have sticky headers, forwarded on to ScrollView. These sticky headers are exempt from virtualization once realized for the first time. This change documents the behavior of keeping sticky header cells realized after scrolling away. This scenario performs the same behavior as creating an internal "realization window" for sticky headers with a single cell window size. Generalizing the concept of realization windows should be shaped to support the existing sticky header scenario.
Pushed out a new commit with a few updates:
|
* | ||
* Defaults to keeping a single screen at the beginning of the list realized | ||
*/ | ||
home?: RealizationWindow; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we should call this start
instead. The "home" terminology doesn't really fit well with our other APIs, and "start" is clear.
*/ | ||
export type RealizationWindow = | ||
| boolean | ||
| [boolean, {windowSize?: number}]; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I feel like this might be too much unnecessary configuration being able to adjust each windowSize
. Any reason we'd ever want this to not be 1?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The default windowSize
for the viewport is fairly large, rendering a whole 10 screens above and below. This is a pretty aggressive amount of pre-rendering. It seems like existing setup optimizes for avoiding blanking on fast movement/interaction over memory consumption.
The realization areas have the potential for similar issues. A conceivable user scenario is to quickly tab between items taller than a viewport. Items would possibly not be realized in time for the keyboard interaction. Keeping a larger window fixes this, but a viewport's worth of native controls could be a non-trivial amount of memory, or cause jank due to excessive native renders.
The right amount of prerendering here seems to depend on scenario. I think we can pick something sane as a default, but am not confident a specific size would work well in all scenarios
I think there might be some alternate APIs to make configuration cleaner, and want to play around with that. I think configurability would be useful here in a general-sense though.
|
||
Endpoint detection is generally performed via `Platform` APIs, such as | ||
`Platform.isTV()` or `Platform.isPad()`. This change would add a | ||
`Platform.isDesktop()` endpoint query to allow desktop-specific behavior. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Love this! I suggest this in facebook/react-native#29937 but that never was completed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think Android also has this, withPlatformConstants.constants.uiMode
being 'desk' for desktop.
Summary: See react-native-community/discussions-and-proposals#335 for extra context. A VirtualizedList may have sticky headers, forwarded on to ScrollView. These sticky headers are exempt from virtualization once realized for the first time. This change documents the behavior of keeping sticky header cells realized after scrolling away. This scenario performs the same behavior as creating an internal "realization window" for sticky headers with a single cell window size. Generalizing the concept of realization windows should be shaped to support the existing sticky header scenario. ## Changelog <!-- Help reviewers and the release process by writing your own changelog entry. For an example, see: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/wiki/Changelog --> [Internal] [Added] - Add tests describing current sticky header realization behavior Pull Request resolved: #31075 Reviewed By: lunaleaps Differential Revision: D26767582 Pulled By: appden fbshipit-source-id: 0d151bd6046fcb5384c646205aafa1ca7edf6c77
Perhaps somewhat related, I was considering if it might be possible to reduce the number of onLayout events emitted made by items in a FlatList, especially in inverted scenarios where content is refreshed from the top. From what I could tell, there are at least two uses for onLayout events that aren't in the fixed start/end realization windows. One is for calculating the height of the spacers and the other is for implementing scrollToIndex. If the native platform offered something to scroll a given component into view, e.g., BringIntoView on XAML or scrollIntoView on Web, we would only need to capture the size metrics of the virtualization candidates, which are significantly less likely to change (but we'd need to add some onSizeChanged or similar event to complement onLayout that could fire less frequently). In order for something like native scrollToIndex to work, we'd need the ability to realize a window around that view prior to invoking a command, so I'm curious if what you have proposed here would be compatible with this theoretical optimization 😀 |
PRs for internal refactoring of VirtualizedList state representation are now out. This should let us start realizing discontiguous regions. |
Summary: Add capture-phase focus events to the type system, for use in the refactored VirtualizedList https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/32646/files Tracking the last focused child is done via focus events. Focus events are bubbling (vs direct events like onLayout), and are given both a "capture" phase, and "bubbling phase", like DOM events on the web. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4616694/what-is-event-bubbling-and-capturing The VirtualizedList change wants to know if a child will receive focus. This is not possible to reliably capture in the bubbling phase, since a child may stop propagation. See react-native-community/discussions-and-proposals#335 (comment) for some discussion with Scott Kyle about this issue back in the day This is done by convention in React by adding a "capture" variant of the `onXXX` method. For all platforms I've seen with focus events, these map the `topFocus` native event to `onFocus` for bubbling phase, and `onFocusCapture` for capture phase. See https://reactjs.org/docs/events.html#supported-events Changelog: [General][Added] - Add types for onFocusCapture/onBlurCapture Reviewed By: javache Differential Revision: D38013861 fbshipit-source-id: 7bda22e1a4d5e36ac5e34e804abf6fb318a41baf
Summary: # This Change react-native-community/discussions-and-proposals#335 discussed a set of problems with VirtualizedList and focus. These were seen as severe externally for a11y on desktop. The issues center on users of keyboard and accessibility tools, where users expect to be able to move focus in an uninterrupted loop. The design and implementation evolved to be a bit more general, and without any API-surface behavior changes. It was implemented and rolled out externally as a series of changes. The remaining changes that were not upstreamed into RN are rolled into #32646 This diff brings this change into the repo, as a separate copy of VirtualizedList, to measure its impact to guardrail metrics, without yet making it the default implementation. The intention is for this to be temporary, until there is confidence the implementation is correct. ## List Implementation (more on GitHub) This change makes it possible to synchronously move native focus to arbitrary items in a VirtualizedList. This is implemented by switching component state to a sparse bitset. This was previously implemented and upstreamed as `CellRenderMask`. A usage of this is added, to keep the last focused item rendered. This allows the focus loop to remain unbroken, when scrolling away, or tab loops which leave/re-enter the list. VirtualizedList tracks the last focused cell through the capture phase of `onFocus`. It will keep the cell, and a viewport above and below the last focused cell rendered, to allow movement to it without blanking (without using too much memory). ## Experimentation Implementation A mechanism is added to gate the change via VirtualizedListInjection, mirroring the approach taken for Switch with D27381306 (683b825). It allows VirtualizedList to delegate to a global override. It has a slight penalty to needing to import both modules, but means code which imports VirtualizedList directly is affected the changes. Changelog: [Internal][Added] - Add VirtualizedList_EXPERIMENTAL (CellRenderMask Usage) Reviewed By: lunaleaps Differential Revision: D38020408 fbshipit-source-id: ad0aaa6791f3f4455e3068502a2841f3ffb40b41
Summary: # This Change react-native-community/discussions-and-proposals#335 discussed a set of problems with VirtualizedList and focus. These were seen as severe externally for a11y on desktop. The issues center on users of keyboard and accessibility tools, where users expect to be able to move focus in an uninterrupted loop. The design and implementation evolved to be a bit more general, and without any API-surface behavior changes. It was implemented and rolled out externally as a series of changes. The remaining changes that were not upstreamed into RN are rolled into facebook#32646 This diff brings this change into the repo, as a separate copy of VirtualizedList, to measure its impact to guardrail metrics, without yet making it the default implementation. The intention is for this to be temporary, until there is confidence the implementation is correct. ## List Implementation (more on GitHub) This change makes it possible to synchronously move native focus to arbitrary items in a VirtualizedList. This is implemented by switching component state to a sparse bitset. This was previously implemented and upstreamed as `CellRenderMask`. A usage of this is added, to keep the last focused item rendered. This allows the focus loop to remain unbroken, when scrolling away, or tab loops which leave/re-enter the list. VirtualizedList tracks the last focused cell through the capture phase of `onFocus`. It will keep the cell, and a viewport above and below the last focused cell rendered, to allow movement to it without blanking (without using too much memory). ## Experimentation Implementation A mechanism is added to gate the change via VirtualizedListInjection, mirroring the approach taken for Switch with D27381306 (facebook@683b825). It allows VirtualizedList to delegate to a global override. It has a slight penalty to needing to import both modules, but means code which imports VirtualizedList directly is affected the changes. Changelog: [Internal][Added] - Add VirtualizedList_EXPERIMENTAL (CellRenderMask Usage) Reviewed By: lunaleaps Differential Revision: D38020408 fbshipit-source-id: ad0aaa6791f3f4455e3068502a2841f3ffb40b41
Summary: # This Change react-native-community/discussions-and-proposals#335 discussed a set of problems with VirtualizedList and focus. These were seen as severe externally for a11y on desktop. The issues center on users of keyboard and accessibility tools, where users expect to be able to move focus in an uninterrupted loop. The design and implementation evolved to be a bit more general, and without any API-surface behavior changes. It was implemented and rolled out externally as a series of changes. The remaining changes that were not upstreamed into RN are rolled into facebook#32646 This diff brings this change into the repo, as a separate copy of VirtualizedList, to measure its impact to guardrail metrics, without yet making it the default implementation. The intention is for this to be temporary, until there is confidence the implementation is correct. ## List Implementation (more on GitHub) This change makes it possible to synchronously move native focus to arbitrary items in a VirtualizedList. This is implemented by switching component state to a sparse bitset. This was previously implemented and upstreamed as `CellRenderMask`. A usage of this is added, to keep the last focused item rendered. This allows the focus loop to remain unbroken, when scrolling away, or tab loops which leave/re-enter the list. VirtualizedList tracks the last focused cell through the capture phase of `onFocus`. It will keep the cell, and a viewport above and below the last focused cell rendered, to allow movement to it without blanking (without using too much memory). ## Experimentation Implementation A mechanism is added to gate the change via VirtualizedListInjection, mirroring the approach taken for Switch with D27381306 (facebook@683b825). It allows VirtualizedList to delegate to a global override. It has a slight penalty to needing to import both modules, but means code which imports VirtualizedList directly is affected the changes. Changelog: [Internal][Added] - Add VirtualizedList_EXPERIMENTAL (CellRenderMask Usage) Reviewed By: lunaleaps Differential Revision: D38020408 fbshipit-source-id: ad0aaa6791f3f4455e3068502a2841f3ffb40b41
VirtualizedList virtualizes away items based on proximity to the lists viewport,
without consideration for other inputs such as focus or selection. This
strategy limits the ability to correctly implement some common keyboard
interactions. This especially impacts desktop platforms (react-native-web,
react-native-windows, react-native-macos), but also impacts the tablet with
keyboard form-factor on iPadOS/Android.
This proposal outlines these issues, proposing a set of behavior changes and new
APIs to address them. It does not address concrete implementation.