Add support for quaternion in URDF #77
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This was referenced Jan 20, 2024
doisyg
force-pushed
the
quat_without_package_xml
branch
from
077703e
to
014db98
Compare
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Doisy <guillaume@dexory.com>
doisyg
force-pushed
the
quat_without_package_xml
branch
from
014db98
to
1639ee7
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New attempt at #51
See discussion in issue: ros/urdfdom#195
And matching PR in
urdfdom: ros/urdfdom#194Version bumped from 1.1.1 to 1.2.0
For branch with
package.xml, see: https://github.com/doisyg/urdfdom_headers/blob/quat/package.xml