-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Deprecate mach APIs: users should use the mach
crate instead.
#1364
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
@gnzlbg: no appropriate reviewer found, use r? to override |
alexcrichton
approved these changes
May 24, 2019
@bors: r+ |
📌 Commit 09454fa has been approved by |
gnzlbg
added a commit
to gnzlbg/libc
that referenced
this pull request
May 25, 2019
Deprecate mach APIs: users should use the `mach` crate instead. See rust-lang#981, the mach APIs have breaking changes from MacOSX SDK release to release, and that's pretty much what the users are seeing here. We are currently not exposing that many `mach` APIs in `libc`, so this PR deprecates them, forwarding users to use the `mach` crate instead, which provides the mach user-space APIs, is tested against multiple SDK versions, handles removed/deprecated/breaking API changes/etc. Doing all of that in `libc` feels overkill. Closes rust-lang#981 .
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 25, 2019
Deprecate mach APIs: users should use the `mach` crate instead. See #981, the mach APIs have breaking changes from MacOSX SDK release to release, and that's pretty much what the users are seeing here. We are currently not exposing that many `mach` APIs in `libc`, so this PR deprecates them, forwarding users to use the `mach` crate instead, which provides the mach user-space APIs, is tested against multiple SDK versions, handles removed/deprecated/breaking API changes/etc. Doing all of that in `libc` feels overkill. Closes #981 .
☀️ Test successful - checks-cirrus, checks-travis, status-appveyor |
This was referenced Jul 13, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
See #981, the mach APIs have breaking changes from MacOSX SDK release to release, and that's pretty much what the users are seeing here. We are currently not exposing that many
mach
APIs inlibc
, so this PR deprecates them, forwarding users to use themach
crate instead, which provides the mach user-space APIs, is tested against multiple SDK versions, handles removed/deprecated/breaking API changes/etc. Doing all of that inlibc
feels overkill.Closes #981 .