-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 6 pull requests #90732
Closed
Closed
Rollup of 6 pull requests #90732
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This feature is aimed at giving proc macros access to powers similar to those used by builtin macros such as `format_args!` or `concat!`. These macros are able to accept macros in place of string literal parameters, such as the format string, as they perform recursive macro expansion while being expanded. This can be especially useful in many cases thanks to helper macros like `concat!`, `stringify!` and `include_str!` which are often used to construct string literals at compile-time in user code. For now, this method only allows expanding macros which produce literals, although more expresisons will be supported before the method is stabilized.
… off-switch This also fixes `x doc src/tools/clippy` when compiler-docs is disabled.
As far as I can tell, this parameter was never used, so just delete it as unnecessary.
proc_macro: Add an expand_expr method to TokenStream This feature is aimed at giving proc macros access to powers similar to those used by builtin macros such as `format_args!` or `concat!`. These macros are able to accept macros in place of string literal parameters, such as the format string, as they perform recursive macro expansion while being expanded. This can be especially useful in many cases thanks to helper macros like `concat!`, `stringify!` and `include_str!` which are often used to construct string literals at compile-time in user code. For now, this method only allows expanding macros which produce literals, although more expressions will be supported before the method is stabilized. In earlier versions of this PR, this method exclusively returned `Literal`, and spans on returned literals were stripped of expansion context before being returned to be as conservative as possible about permission leakage. The method's naming has been generalized to eventually support arbitrary expressions, and the context stripping has been removed (rust-lang#87264 (comment)), which should allow for more general APIs like "format_args_implicits" (rust-lang#67984) to be supported as well. ## API Surface ```rust impl TokenStream { pub fn expand_expr(&self) -> Result<Expr, ExpandError>; } #[non_exhaustive] pub struct ExpandError; impl Debug for ExpandError { ... } impl Display for ExpandError { ... } impl Error for ExpandError {} impl !Send for ExpandError {} impl !Sync for ExpandError {} ```
…test, r=Mark-Simulacrum Allow to run a specific rustdoc-js* test r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
…crum Make `compiler-docs` only control the default instead of being a hard off-switch This also fixes `x doc src/tools/clippy` when compiler-docs is disabled. See rust-lang#90354 (comment). r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
…ulacrum x.py: remove fixme by deleting code As far as I can tell, this parameter was never used, so just delete it as unnecessary.
…s, r=davidtwco Record more artifact sizes during self-profiling. This PR adds artifact size recording for - "linked artifacts" (executables, RLIBs, dylibs, static libs) - object files - dwo files - assembly files - crate metadata - LLVM bitcode files - LLVM IR files - codegen unit size estimates Currently the identifiers emitted for these are hard-coded as string literals. Is it worth adding constants to https://github.com/rust-lang/measureme/blob/master/measureme/src/rustc.rs instead? We don't do that for query names and the like -- but artifact kinds might be more stable than query names.
Better document `Box` and `alloc::alloc::box_free` connection The internal `alloc::alloc::box_free` function requires that its signature matches the `owned_box` struct's declaration, but previously that connection was only documented on the `box_free` function. This PR makes the documentation two-way to help anyone making theoretical changes to `Box` to see the connection, since changes are more likely to originate from `Box`.
@bors r+ rollup=never p=6 |
📌 Commit 6ed9660 has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
label
Nov 9, 2021
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
compiler-docs
only control the default instead of being a hard off-switch #90683 (Makecompiler-docs
only control the default instead of being a hard off-switch)Box
andalloc::alloc::box_free
connection #90723 (Better documentBox
andalloc::alloc::box_free
connection)Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup