-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 185
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merge OrganizeImports 0.6.0+37-596459af into Scalafix as a built-in rule #1480
Conversation
…serving import group (scalacenter#38)
Bumps [codecov/codecov-action](https://github.com/codecov/codecov-action) from 2.1.0 to 3.1.0. - [Release notes](https://github.com/codecov/codecov-action/releases) - [Changelog](https://github.com/codecov/codecov-action/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md) - [Commits](codecov/codecov-action@v2.1.0...v3.1.0) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: codecov/codecov-action dependency-type: direct:production update-type: version-update:semver-major ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Any updated status on this? The referenced issue #1528 appears merged. What is remaining? |
I'd be happy to pick up the work on this if there is anything left to be done |
Not 100% sure what needs to be done, but probably if you are able to finish the rest of TODOs and raise another PR that would be great! @liancheng I worry might not have enough time on his hands to respond @bjaglin what do you think? What do we need here to be done still? |
Bumps [olafurpg/setup-scala](https://github.com/olafurpg/setup-scala) from 13 to 14. - [Release notes](https://github.com/olafurpg/setup-scala/releases) - [Commits](olafurpg/setup-scala@v13...v14) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: olafurpg/setup-scala dependency-type: direct:production update-type: version-update:semver-major ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@tgodzik, sorry for the late response, but yeah, I'm afraid I no longer have cycles to maintain this project, and I don't have enough expertise to address Scala 3 related issues. I believe merging this rule into Scalafix is the best choice for the community. |
@daddykotex I think the remaining points need to be addressed so:
Otherwise a stretch goals would be:
but I think two first points would be enough unless anyone else disagrees? |
04a826c
to
e69ba2c
Compare
Sorry for not getting back to you despite offering your help @daddykotex. I finally found some time to integrate the tests, the doc (asciidoc2markdown & a bunch of manual updates), as well as the git history (all changes happen in a merge commit so The GitHub UI does not play very well with merge commits as the diff is only done with the main parent, but you should be able to see the actual diff compared to the original repo by looking at liancheng@b10f4f2 with a local git tool
I ran a quick test to ensure that having 2 I would still like to add a check to avoid the compatibility warning when having
I'll see if I get the time to do that this week, before the upcoming 0.11.0 release just waiting for the Scala 2.x patch releases. |
It turns out that the imported rule contains a (cool) unreleased bugfix 💪 |
Per the discussion in liancheng/scalafix-organize-imports#215, this PR tries to merge the
OrganizeImports
rule into Scalafix as a built-in rule.TODO:
OrganizeImports
rule under thecom.github.liancheng
packageBonus:
RemoveUnused.imports
&OrganizeImports.removeUnused
are both enabled