Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Get rid of chef_gem. #21

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Get rid of chef_gem. #21

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

luishdez
Copy link
Contributor

@luishdez luishdez commented May 9, 2015

chef_gem fails because build-essential isn't installed at compile time.
The Chef guys are recommending that complex things like replicaset and
mongos become LWRPs, which is probably in progress but this fixes the
chef_gem issue quickly.
@luishdez
Copy link
Contributor Author

Not sure if this is the best idea… it works as a quick fix

I'd address the issue with compile time with default['build-essential']['compile_time'] = true

Check: https://github.com/chef-brigade/mongodb-cookbook/pull/14/files

@josephholsten
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM so long as it gets a comment explaining when we can rip it out

@@ -24,7 +24,15 @@
node.override['mongodb']['instance_name'] = 'mongos'

include_recipe 'mongodb::install'
include_recipe 'mongodb::mongo_gem'

ruby_block 'chef_gem_at_converge_time' do·

This comment was marked as outdated.

This comment was marked as outdated.

This comment was marked as outdated.

@josephholsten josephholsten mentioned this pull request Jun 8, 2015
@luishdez
Copy link
Contributor Author

luishdez commented Jun 9, 2015

Closing in favor of #39

@luishdez luishdez closed this Jun 9, 2015
@josephholsten josephholsten deleted the pr/370 branch July 13, 2015 22:35
@lock
Copy link

lock bot commented Jul 24, 2018

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.

@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 24, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants