Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: simplify count statements #93

Merged

Conversation

DrFaust92
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Simplify Count statement in 2 cases of policy attachments as it causes failures during apply in some cases

Motivation and Context

Simplify Count statement in 2 cases of policy attachments as it causes failures during apply in some cases

Breaking Changes

No.

How Has This Been Tested?

Yes.

@DrFaust92 DrFaust92 changed the title simplify count statements fix: simplify count statements Sep 3, 2020
@DrFaust92 DrFaust92 changed the title fix: simplify count statements Fix: simplify count statements Sep 3, 2020
@DrFaust92 DrFaust92 changed the title Fix: simplify count statements fix: simplify count statements Sep 3, 2020
@DrFaust92 DrFaust92 closed this Sep 3, 2020
@DrFaust92 DrFaust92 reopened this Sep 3, 2020
@DrFaust92
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bryantbiggs if you have some time to take a look.

@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ resource "aws_iam_policy" "iam_self_management" {
}

resource "aws_iam_policy" "custom" {
count = length(var.custom_group_policies) > 0 ? length(var.custom_group_policies) : 0
count = length(var.custom_group_policies)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks good - might be worth considering a refactor to for_each with an array of maps. just food for thought

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ill go over he module and see where this refactor is needed. i wanted to make changes more incremental

Copy link
Member

@bryantbiggs bryantbiggs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks good to me - @antonbabenko?

@antonbabenko antonbabenko merged commit 5825fb4 into terraform-aws-modules:master Sep 8, 2020
@antonbabenko
Copy link
Member

Nice and sweet 👍

v2.20.0 has been just released.

hoylemd added a commit to pixlee/terraform-aws-iam that referenced this pull request Oct 14, 2020
* upstream/master: (26 commits)
  Updated CHANGELOG
  fix: Fixed ses_smtp_password_v4 output name
  Updated CHANGELOG
  fix: simplify count statements (terraform-aws-modules#93)
  Updated CHANGELOG
  fix: Allow running on custom AWS partition (incl. govcloud) (terraform-aws-modules#94)
  Updated CHANGELOG
  feat: modules/iam-assumable-role-with-oidc: Support multiple provider URLs (terraform-aws-modules#91)
  Updated CHANGELOG
  feat: Strip https:// from OIDC provider URL if present (terraform-aws-modules#50)
  Updated CHANGELOG
  fix: Allow modules/iam-assumable-role-with-oidc to work in govcloud (terraform-aws-modules#83)
  Updated CHANGELOG
  feat: Added support for sts:ExternalId in modules/iam-assumable-role (terraform-aws-modules#90)
  Updated CHANGELOG
  fix: Delete DEPRECATED ses_smtp_password in iam-user. (terraform-aws-modules#88)
  Updated CHANGELOG
  feat: Support for Terraform v0.13 and AWS provider v3 (terraform-aws-modules#87)
  docs: Updated example in README (terraform-aws-modules#52)
  Updated CHANGELOG
  ...
@github-actions
Copy link

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 10, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants