Relax user activation requirement for show() #1025
Comments
|
Oh, hi! What is the reasoning for doing this after #1021 instead of keeping the "user activation requirement" unchanged? |
|
See related answer. |
stephenmcgruer
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 21, 2024
As per the plan outlined in #1021#issuecomment-2107832273, we have now created the CR Snapshot and published a new CR Draft (https://www.w3.org/TR/payment-request/) that includes restoring the address changes. The only remaining work for that plan is to restore the previous changes that had been made since REC. Changes included: - [Spec] Relax user activation requirement for show() #1009 Additional edits on tops of above changes: - Add note linking to issue #1022 for discussion of user activation relaxing conditions Fixes #1025
stephenmcgruer
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 21, 2024
As per the plan outlined in #1021#issuecomment-2107832273, we have now created the CR Snapshot and published a new CR Draft (https://www.w3.org/TR/payment-request/) that includes restoring the address changes. The only remaining work for that plan is to restore the previous changes that had been made since REC. Changes included: - [Spec] Relax user activation requirement for show() #1009 Additional edits on tops of above changes: - Add note linking to issue #1022 for discussion of user activation relaxing conditions Fixes #1025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
After #1021, we need to bring back this text: d9352e2
CC @rsolomakhin, @stephenmcgruer
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: