[ReleasePR Azure.ResourceManager.CosmosDB] update readme #23554
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
![openapi-sdkautomation[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/10463?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Enable SDK automation for track-2 SDKs (Azure#15777) * Add blockchain to latest profile * Add additional types * Enable SDK automation for track-2 SDKs * Revert extra changes * Revert * Revert * Revert Co-authored-by: Mark Cowlishaw <markcowl@microsoft.com>
ghost
added
the
customer-reported
|
Thank you for your contribution @openapi-sdkautomation[bot]! We will review the pull request and get back to you soon. |
ghost
added
the
Community Contribution
openapi-sdkautomation
bot
changed the title
26 tasks
openapi-sdkautomation
bot
changed the title
openapi-sdkautomation
bot
changed the title
25 tasks
openapi-sdkautomation
bot
changed the title
25 tasks
openapi-sdkautomation
bot
changed the title
25 tasks
openapi-sdkautomation
bot
changed the title
25 tasks
openapi-sdkautomation
bot
changed the title
25 tasks
openapi-sdkautomation
bot
changed the title
25 tasks
openapi-sdkautomation
bot
changed the title
25 tasks
openapi-sdkautomation
bot
changed the title
25 tasks
openapi-sdkautomation
bot
changed the title
25 tasks
openapi-sdkautomation
bot
changed the title
25 tasks
openapi-sdkautomation
bot
changed the title
25 tasks
openapi-sdkautomation
bot
changed the title
25 tasks
openapi-sdkautomation
bot
changed the title
openapi-sdkautomation
bot
changed the title
openapi-sdkautomation
bot
changed the title
openapi-sdkautomation
bot
changed the title
25 tasks
openapi-sdkautomation
bot
changed the title
25 tasks
openapi-sdkautomation
bot
changed the title
25 tasks
openapi-sdkautomation
bot
changed the title
25 tasks
openapi-sdkautomation
bot
changed the title
25 tasks
openapi-sdkautomation
bot
changed the title
25 tasks
openapi-sdkautomation
bot
changed the title
azure-sdk
pushed a commit
to azure-sdk/azure-sdk-for-net
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 25, 2023
Release of microsoft.network api version: 2022 11 01 (Azure#23652) * Adds base for updating Microsoft.Network from version stable/2022-09-01 to version 2022-11-01 * Updates readme * Updates API version in new specs and examples * remove loadDistributionPolicy from appgw PUT request body example (Azure#23144) * remove loadDistributionPolicy from appgw PUT request body example * remove loadDistributionPolicy from appgw PUT request body example2 * remove loadDistributionPolicy from appgw PUT request body example * remove duplicates * add private link configuration to see if it will fix validation error * remove privateLinkConfig related * revert changes to see if still get validation error * update back to original changes * add response resource id to fix modelValidation error * add connection resource * Selector in Exclusions should not be required as Operator EqualsAny does not need a Selector (Azure#23184) * Application Gateway WAF Rate Limit feature swagger changes (Azure#23021) * Application Gateway WAF Rate Limit feature swagger changes * Fixing lint errors * Updated rate limit feature examples * Fix for applicationGatewayIpConfigurations property and make the priority parameter as required for NSG (Azure#23210) * Fix for applicationGatewayIpConfigurations property This swagger definition is defining property applicationGatewayIpConfigurations, ``` "applicationGatewayIpConfigurations": { "type": "array", "items": { "$ref": "./applicationGateway.json#/definitions/ApplicationGatewayIPConfiguration" }, "description": "Application gateway IP configurations of virtual network resource." } ``` but actual rest api returned applicationGatewayIPConfigurations, the P is upper case while in swagger it is lower case. ``` { "name": "subnet-agw", "id": "/subscriptions/<sub-id>/resourceGroups/<rg-name>/providers/Microsoft.Network/virtualNetworks/<vnet-name>/subnets/subnet-agw", "properties": { "applicationGatewayIPConfigurations": [ { "id": "/subscriptions/<sub-id>/resourceGroups/<rg-name>/providers/Microsoft.Network/applicationGateways/<agw-name>/gatewayIPConfigurations/appGatewayIpConfig" } ] }, "type": "Microsoft.Network/virtualNetworks/subnets" } ``` * Making priority property required [This is the API invoked](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/rest/api/virtualnetwork/network-security-groups/create-or-update?tabs=HTTP#code-try-0). For the NSG security rules without priorities, seems like the priority parameter is required. Azure portal works as expected. I don't think that's allowed but according to the schema it is because the priority property is not marked as required. I tried to create a NSG security rule without the priorities and it failed with below. Request Body: ``` { "properties": { "securityRules": [ { "name": "rule1", "properties": { "protocol": "*", "sourceAddressPrefix": "*", "destinationAddressPrefix": "*", "access": "Allow", "destinationPortRange": "80", "sourcePortRange": "*", "direction": "Inbound" } } ] }, "location": "eastus" } ``` Response received: ``` { "error": { "code": "SecurityRuleInvalidPriority", "message": "Security rule has invalid Priority. Value provided: 0 Allowed range 100-4096.", "details": [] } } ``` This PR will make the priority parameter as required. * Update NetworkSecurityGroupDelete.json * Update NetworkSecurityGroupRuleDelete.json * Update NetworkSecurityGroupDelete.json * Undo previous change of making fields optional within Exclusion (Azure#23325) * Nivishenker/http headers to insert (Azure#23295) * new app rule property - http header to insert * prettier * add to 22-11-01 * removed changes from 22-09-01 * fixed example * delete RCG example * fix delete examples * added a Location header * prettier fix * Application Gateway WAF Log scrubbing swagger changes (Azure#23022) * Log scrubbing API changes * Update examples * Addressing comments * Fix * Update property in load balancer for Connection Draining Phase 1 (Azure#23082) * Update property in load balancer for Coneection Draining Phase 1 * Fix model validation * Azure Firewall Packet Capture API. Cancelled PR from 2022-09-01 and created for 2022-11-01 (Azure#23114) * moving packet-capture api to 2022-11-01 release from 2022-09-01 * fixing the LRO response header error for model validation * Changes for Additional nic and corrections (Azure#23522) * Changes for Additional nic and corrections * Fixes for tool reported issues * Fix for SpellCheck, ModelValidation * Defining Location in NetworkVirtualApplianceDelete for async * Minor fix * Minor fix * Minor fix * PrettierCheck fixed * Fixing VirtualApplianceAdditionalNicProperties * ModelValidation fixed * Correcting the location header string * Correcting location header * Prettied Check Fix * Fix * Fix * Add inspection limit changes (Azure#23536) * Fixed headers for examples (Azure#23554) * Fix response of API: List of advertised/learned BGP routes (Azure#23555) * fix response type * fix format * fix example, add x-ms-identifiers * AuxiliarySku on Nic (Azure#23552) * Adding auxiliary sku property on nic * Adding AcceleratedConnections to AuxMode * modifying the auxSku values * Removing accidental change --------- Co-authored-by: Prachi Pravin Bhavsar <prbhavsar@microsoft.com> * migrated latest pr from incorrect branch (Azure#23589) * Changes for NVA connection (Azure#23173) * Changes for NVA connection * Changes to address validation failures * Fix some ModelValidation errors * Fix some ModelValidation errors * Fix some ModelValidation errors * Fix some ModelValidation errors * Fix some ModelValidation errors * Addressing some review comments * Addressing some review comments * Addressing some review comments * Addressing some review comments * Addressing some review comments * Fix camel case for property name * Fixing resourceUri to Camel case in example files * Fix SDK duplication error * Fix one LintDiff error * try fix lintdiff errors * fix lro erro in lintdiff * fix model validation error * Bastion S360 for 2022-11 version (Azure#23595) * Release microsoft.network 2022 11 01 (Azure#23564) * Application Gateway WAF Rate Limit feature swagger changes * Fixing lint errors * Updated rate limit feature examples * rateLimitDuration and rateLimitThreshold are not mandatory. There are only mandatory if ruleType is RateLimitRule. This validation will be done in NRP. * Fix attempt 2. Removed minimum constraint from rateLimitThreshold. Validation will be done in NRP * Remove the minimum number for the option field requestBodyInspectLimitInKB (Azure#23663) * Remove minimum value for optional field requestBodyInspectLimitInKB * Remove exlcusiveMinimum --------- Co-authored-by: htippanaboya <102244326+htippanaboya@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: tracyMicro <127259533+tracyMicro@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: tejasshah7 <49326906+tejasshah7@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: sraghavan-msft <98118843+sraghavan-msft@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: navba-MSFT <57353862+navba-MSFT@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: NiviShenker <99583088+NiviShenker@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Sindhu Aluguvelli <sindhureddy216@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: phrazfipho <121897152+phrazfipho@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: nikhilpadhye1 <68977752+nikhilpadhye1@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: JainRah <108508612+JainRah@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: karanbazaz <karan.bazaz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: yeliMSFT <95386492+yeliMSFT@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: pracsb <78512712+pr-work@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Prachi Pravin Bhavsar <prbhavsar@microsoft.com> Co-authored-by: nanditaashok-ms <122581061+nanditaashok-ms@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: anvrao1 <109107918+anvrao1@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: baoqihuang0326 <119557638+baoqihuang0326@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Create to sync Azure/azure-rest-api-specs#18230
ReCreate this PR
Download the Azure.ResourceManager.CosmosDB package from here