Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove "Field name:" from localization - we already have "Field name" #9991

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 8, 2023

Conversation

koppor
Copy link
Member

@koppor koppor commented Jun 8, 2023

Triggered by https://github.com/JabRef/jabref/pull/9989/files#diff-f1bccc4fe4e0595584a0e84d950cb03c36f9246fa7f5799a526b1d34d1c434be

Mandatory checks

  • Change in CHANGELOG.md described in a way that is understandable for the average user (if applicable)
  • Tests created for changes (if applicable)
  • Manually tested changed features in running JabRef (always required)
  • Screenshots added in PR description (for UI changes)
  • Checked developer's documentation: Is the information available and up to date? If not, I outlined it in this pull request.
  • Checked documentation: Is the information available and up to date? If not, I created an issue at https://github.com/JabRef/user-documentation/issues or, even better, I submitted a pull request to the documentation repository.

@koppor koppor added the status: ready-for-review Pull Requests that are ready to be reviewed by the maintainers label Jun 8, 2023
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ BooleanBinding isNoKeywordSelected() {
}

void showInputFieldNameDialog() {
dialogService.showInputDialogAndWait(Localization.lang("Add new field name"), Localization.lang("Field name:"))
dialogService.showInputDialogAndWait(Localization.lang("Add new field name"), Localization.lang("Field name") + ":")
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please don't do this! you never know other non latin languages handle this!

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A) The existing code already has these things

B) all translations have the : at the end - or omit it.

Example:

image

I think, all of them are wrong ^^

Example for this:

image

The : should be removed as the label formatting itself should indicate that it is a label - and not the :

@calixtus calixtus merged commit d1aa6ed into main Jun 8, 2023
@calixtus calixtus deleted the fix-dupclicate-translation branch June 8, 2023 19:59
Siedlerchr added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 1, 2024
* upstream/main: (68 commits)
  Fix issue 9863 - Change Tab selection order (#9907)
  New Crowdin updates (#9994)
  Enable editing typo with double clicking on field name in custom entry type (#9977)
  Remove "Field name:" from localization - we already have "Field name" (#9991)
  Changed database to catalog in org.jabref.gui.slr and org.jabref.logic.crawler (#9989)
  Use environment variables for hostname detection (#9910)
  Add cleanup activity for URL field (#9970)
  Fix freezing when fetching IBSN and no results are found (#9987)
  Make Group(Node)TreeViewModel more OO (#9978)
  Fix container for group item count still visible if display count is off  (#9980)
  Fix paste of BibTeX data (#9985)
  Bring back SimplifyBoolean* and UnnecessaryParantheses (and refine guide) (#9981)
  Add new menu entry to remove braces from selection, aka unprotect it. (#9968)
  User specific comment (#9727)
  Bump org.openrewrite.recipe:rewrite-recipe-bom from 1.19.3 to 2.0.0 (#9975)
  Fix typos
  Remove non-needed link
  Fix typos
  Enable RemoveJavaDocAuthorTag (#9973)
  Bump com.fasterxml.jackson.datatype:jackson-datatype-jsr310 (#9974)
  ...
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
status: ready-for-review Pull Requests that are ready to be reviewed by the maintainers
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants