docs(x/mint): Fix inconsistency in mint docs

[likhita-809]

Description

Closes: #15886

---

Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

• included the correct type prefix in the PR title
• confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
• targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
• provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
• reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
• included the necessary unit and integration tests
• added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
• updated the relevant documentation or specification, including comments for documenting Go code
• confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

• confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
• confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
• reviewed state machine logic, API design and naming, documentation is accurate, tests and test coverage

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Updated descriptions related to inflation rate adjustments in the mint module README.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The change involves updating the mint module documentation in the Cosmos SDK to address inconsistencies in describing inflation rate adjustments based on the percentage of bonded tokens. The goal is to provide accurate information on how inflation rate adjustments are determined in relation to the actual percentage of bonded tokens compared to the target bonding percentage.

Changes

File Change	Summary of Change
x/mint/README.md	Updated descriptions related to inflation rate adjustments based on bonded tokens.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective	Addressed	Explanation
Inconsistency in mint docs (#15886)	✅

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

---

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 4

Review Status

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 80e1a45 and 00f4226.

Files selected for processing (1)

• x/mint/README.md (1 hunks)

Additional Context Used

Path-based Instructions (1)

x/mint/README.md (1)

Pattern **/*.md: "Assess the documentation for misspellings, grammatical errors, missing documentation and correctness"

Additional comments not posted (2)

x/mint/README.md (2)

42-46: The updated documentation provides a clearer explanation of how the inflation rate adjusts based on the actual percentage of bonded tokens compared to the goal percentage. This change accurately addresses the issue raised and enhances the reader's understanding of the mint module's functionality.

---

39-49: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [78-78]

Consider adding a determiner before "inflation rate" to improve readability.

Consider rephrasing to: "The inflation rate is calculated using an 'inflation calculation function'..."

[tac0turtle]

Changes look good. We can also take what the ai gave us

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 2

Review Status

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 00f4226 and 3e8b29a.

Files selected for processing (1)

• x/mint/README.md (9 hunks)

Additional Context Used

Path-based Instructions (1)

x/mint/README.md (1)

Pattern **/*.md: "Assess the documentation for misspellings, grammatical errors, missing documentation and correctness"

Additional comments not posted (8)

x/mint/README.md (8)

42-46: The updated descriptions provide a clearer understanding of how the inflation rate adjusts based on the percentage of bonded tokens. This change aligns with the PR's objective to correct inaccuracies in the documentation.

---

64-64: The correction from "it's params" to "its params" has been noted and is grammatically correct. This change was suggested in previous comments and has been correctly implemented.

---

94-94: The addition of a comma after "however" improves the grammatical structure of the sentence, making it clearer. This change was suggested in previous comments and has been correctly implemented.

---

172-172: The command descriptions now correctly use "allows" instead of "allow," addressing the subject-verb agreement error. This change was suggested in previous comments and has been correctly implemented across several lines.

---

180-180: The corrections to use "allows" instead of "allow" in various command descriptions have been made, addressing the subject-verb agreement errors. These changes were suggested in previous comments and have been correctly implemented.

Also applies to: 200-200, 220-220, 243-243, 265-265, 287-287

---

39-49: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [11-11]

Please verify the spelling in the table of contents. While the static analysis tool flagged a possible mistake, it seems to be a false positive related to the markdown syntax rather than an actual spelling error.

---

93-93: Consider adding a preposition to clarify the sentence. For example, "defined to be" could be improved for clarity, but the current wording is not incorrect. It's more of a stylistic choice.

---

178-178: The sentence starting with "simd query mint --help" should begin with an uppercase letter for consistency and adherence to grammatical standards. This change was suggested in previous comments and has been correctly implemented.