Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: noweeb style checks #563

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Sep 28, 2024
Merged

fix: noweeb style checks #563

merged 5 commits into from
Sep 28, 2024

Conversation

lovegaoshi
Copy link
Owner

@lovegaoshi lovegaoshi commented Sep 27, 2024

closes #562

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced NoWeebDialog for customizing appearance settings with color input fields.
  • Improvements
    • Enhanced flexibility of the NoxInput component with optional label and additional properties.
    • Added validation for color values to ensure only valid colors are processed.
  • Refactor
    • Updated export structure for GenericDialog and CredDialog components.
    • Simplified NoWeebButton by removing complex state management for color settings.
  • Dependencies
    • Updated various packages to their latest versions for improved performance and security.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Sep 27, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
azusa-player-mobile ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Sep 28, 2024 1:34pm

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 27, 2024

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The pull request encompasses updates to the package.json file, enhancing various dependencies and devDependencies. It also includes modifications to several React component files, such as changing export methods, updating component interfaces, and introducing new components. Notably, it addresses color validation in the styling logic, aiming to improve the robustness of the application.

Changes

File Change Summary
package.json Updated multiple dependencies and devDependencies, including version upgrades for @react-native-community/netinfo, @sentry/react-native, expo, and others.
src/components/dialogs/GenericDialog.tsx Changed export from default to named export for GenericDialog.
src/components/dialogs/NoxInput.tsx Modified InputProps interface: made label optional, added style and reactNative properties, and updated component rendering logic.
src/components/setting/alist/CredDialog.tsx Restructured export to define CredDialog as a constant and wrapped it in a Portal.
src/components/setting/appearances/NoWeebButton.tsx Replaced GenericDialog with NoWeebDialog, simplifying the component by removing complex state management.
src/components/setting/appearances/NoWeebDialog.tsx Introduced a new dialog component for customizing appearance settings, managing color inputs with validation.
src/components/style.ts Added validation for color values in replaceStyleColor function using the colord library.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Validate color input handling (562) The changes improve color validation but do not address the specific input bugs mentioned in the issue.

Possibly related PRs

  • fix: noweeb style checks #563: Updates in package.json for dependencies like @sentry/react-native and expo, maintaining compatibility with React Native.

Poem

🐇 In the garden of code, changes bloom bright,
Dependencies dance, bringing new light.
Colors now checked, no more fright,
With dialogs fresh, our app takes flight!
Hooray for the tweaks, let’s hop with delight! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 6

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (9)
src/components/setting/appearances/NoWeebButton.tsx (1)

Line range hint 7-19: LGTM: Component structure is clean and follows best practices.

The component has been simplified as per the AI summary, replacing the complex dialog with NoWeebDialog. The state management and prop passing are handled correctly.

Consider naming the component for better debugging and readability. You can do this by assigning the anonymous function to a const:

-export default () => {
+const NoWeebButton = () => {
   const [visible, setVisible] = React.useState(false);

   return (
     <View>
       <NoWeebDialog visible={visible} setVisible={setVisible} />
       <SettingListItem
         settingName="noWeebSkins"
         onPress={() => setVisible(true)}
         settingCategory="AppearanceSettings"
       />
     </View>
   );
 };
+
+export default NoWeebButton;
src/components/dialogs/GenericDialog.tsx (1)

Line range hint 30-31: Enhance translation key specificity

The current translation keys 'Dialog.cancel' and 'Dialog.ok' are quite generic. To improve maintainability and context for translators, consider using more specific keys that relate to this particular dialog.

Suggested change:

-        <Button onPress={handleClose}>{t('Dialog.cancel')}</Button>
-        <Button onPress={handleSubmit}>{t('Dialog.ok')}</Button>
+        <Button onPress={handleClose}>{t('GenericDialog.cancel')}</Button>
+        <Button onPress={handleSubmit}>{t('GenericDialog.confirm')}</Button>

This change provides more context and allows for potentially different translations in different dialogs if needed.

src/components/dialogs/NoxInput.tsx (3)

10-10: LGTM: Interface updated to support new features.

The changes to the InputProps interface are well-thought-out:

  1. Making label optional provides more flexibility.
  2. Adding style allows for custom styling, which is relevant to the color issue mentioned in the linked issue.
  3. The reactNative property enables conditional rendering for different environments.

Consider adding JSDoc comments to these new properties for better documentation:

/** Custom styles to be applied to the input */
style?: TextStyle;
/** Flag to determine if React Native components should be used */
reactNative?: boolean;

Also applies to: 16-17


32-32: LGTM: Conditional input component selection implemented.

The conditional selection of RNTextInput or TextInput based on the reactNative prop is a clean and efficient way to handle different environments. This approach reduces code duplication and improves maintainability.

For improved clarity, consider using a more descriptive name for the variable:

const InputComponent = reactNative ? RNTextInput : TextInput;

This makes it immediately clear that we're dealing with a component, not just an input value.


Line range hint 1-48: Overall assessment: Changes look good and address the PR objectives.

The modifications to NoxInput.tsx effectively address the color-related issues mentioned in the linked issue and improve the component's flexibility:

  1. The component now supports both React Native and web environments.
  2. Custom styling is now possible through the style prop, allowing for better color handling.
  3. The label property is now optional, providing more flexibility in usage.

These changes should help resolve the color input issues and prevent application crashes related to color handling. However, to ensure full resolution of the issue, please:

  1. Implement and test thorough color validation logic.
  2. Add error handling to prevent crashes when invalid colors are input.
  3. Ensure that the application can start normally even after an invalid color input.

Consider implementing a separate color validation utility that can be used across the application to ensure consistent color handling and validation.

src/components/setting/alist/CredDialog.tsx (1)

54-60: LGTM: New export structure with Portal

The new export structure wrapping CredDialog with Portal is a good practice for rendering dialogs. It ensures the dialog is rendered at the root level of the app, which can prevent styling and z-index issues.

Consider using object rest spread for a more concise prop passing:

- export default (p: Props) => {
-   return (
-     <Portal>
-       <CredDialog {...p} />
-     </Portal>
-   );
- };
+ export default (props: Props) => (
+   <Portal>
+     <CredDialog {...props} />
+   </Portal>
+ );
package.json (1)

Line range hint 1-179: Summary of package.json changes and recommendations

The package.json file has undergone significant updates:

  1. Multiple dependencies and devDependencies have been updated to newer versions.
  2. Some dependencies use custom GitHub repositories or specific commits.
  3. The project has transitioned to using Yarn 4 as the package manager.
  4. The required Node.js version is set to 18.0.0 or higher.

To maintain a robust and efficient development process:

  1. Implement a regular dependency update strategy, including reviewing changelogs and testing for breaking changes.
  2. Document the reasons for using custom repositories and specific commits.
  3. Ensure all team members and CI/CD systems are aligned with the use of Yarn 4 and Node.js 18+.
  4. Consider creating a dependency update guide for the project, outlining the process for safely updating packages and handling potential breaking changes.
  5. Regularly review and update the scripts section to ensure it meets the evolving needs of the project.
  6. Implement automated checks in the CI/CD pipeline to verify dependency versions, Node.js version, and Yarn version consistency.

By following these recommendations, you can maintain a healthy, up-to-date, and consistent development environment for your project.

src/components/style.ts (2)

105-105: Improve logging messages for better diagnostics

The current log message '[color converter] color invalid' is generic. Enhancing the log message with specifics about which color(s) are invalid can aid in debugging.

Consider updating the log statement:

-    logger.error('[color converter] color invalid');
+    logger.error('[color converter] Invalid color input detected:', {
+      primaryColor,
+      secondaryColor,
+      contrastColor,
+      backgroundColor,
+    });

97-107: Add unit tests for the color validation logic

To ensure the new validation logic works as expected, especially given the critical nature of preventing application crashes due to invalid colors, consider adding unit tests that cover:

  • Valid color inputs in various formats.
  • Invalid color inputs to verify that the function handles them gracefully.
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2b96b14 and 7ba34c6.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • yarn.lock is excluded by !**/yarn.lock, !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
  • package.json (6 hunks)
  • src/components/dialogs/GenericDialog.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/components/dialogs/NoxInput.tsx (2 hunks)
  • src/components/setting/alist/CredDialog.tsx (3 hunks)
  • src/components/setting/appearances/NoWeebButton.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/components/setting/appearances/NoWeebDialog.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/components/style.ts (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (19)
src/components/setting/appearances/NoWeebButton.tsx (2)

1-5: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and align with component changes.

The imports are correctly updated to reflect the new component structure, including the new NoWeebDialog component.


Line range hint 1-19: Please clarify how these changes address the color issues mentioned in the PR objectives.

The PR objectives and linked issue #562 mention addressing color input, validation, and application crash problems. However, the changes in this file don't seem to directly tackle these issues. Could you please explain how the introduction of NoWeebDialog and the simplification of this component contribute to resolving the color-related problems?

To help understand the context better, let's check the contents of the NoWeebDialog component:

✅ Verification successful

The changes in NoWeebButton.tsx effectively address the color issues by integrating with NoWeebDialog.tsx, which manages color states and validations as outlined in the PR objectives.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the contents of NoWeebDialog.tsx to see if it addresses color-related issues.

# Test: Display the contents of NoWeebDialog.tsx
cat src/components/setting/appearances/NoWeebDialog.tsx

Length of output: 4967

src/components/dialogs/GenericDialog.tsx (2)

Line range hint 1-43: Color validation not addressed in this component

The PR objectives mention addressing a color input and validation issue. However, this GenericDialog component doesn't contain any color-related functionality.

To ensure we're not missing any color-related changes, let's search for color-related code in other files:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for color-related code changes
rg --type typescript --type tsx -i 'color.*input|color.*validation'

If no results are found, consider implementing the color validation logic in a separate component or utility function, then use the GenericDialog to display the color input UI.


13-13: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider updating import statements and removing the default export

The change from default export to named export for GenericDialog is a good practice as it allows for more explicit imports. However, this change may require updates to import statements in files that use this component.

Additionally, the file still contains a default export at the bottom, which wraps GenericDialog in a Portal. This might lead to confusion and inconsistent usage across the codebase.

Consider the following actions:

  1. Update all import statements in other files from import GenericDialog from '...' to import { GenericDialog } from '...'.
  2. Remove the default export at the bottom of the file and export the wrapped version as a named export, e.g., export const PortalGenericDialog = ....

To verify the impact of this change, you can run the following script:

src/components/dialogs/NoxInput.tsx (2)

4-4: LGTM: Import statements updated correctly.

The addition of TextInput as RNTextInput and TextStyle from 'react-native' is appropriate for supporting both React Native and web environments. This change aligns well with the PR's objective of addressing style-related issues.


28-29: LGTM: Component props updated correctly.

The addition of style and reactNative to the props destructuring is consistent with the interface changes. Setting a default value of false for reactNative ensures backward compatibility, which is a good practice.

src/components/setting/alist/CredDialog.tsx (4)

6-6: LGTM: Portal import added

The addition of the Portal import from 'react-native-paper' is appropriate for the new component structure.


15-15: LGTM: Component definition updated

Changing the component definition from a default export to a const is appropriate for the new export structure using Portal.


Line range hint 39-50: Verify the intentional removal of password input

The password input field has been removed from the component, but the state for pwd is still being managed. This raises a few concerns:

  1. If the password is still required, removing the input field could be a security issue.
  2. The pwd state (lines 22 and 33) is now unused, which could lead to confusion.
  3. This change doesn't seem to align with the PR objectives related to color issues.

Please confirm if this removal was intentional and update the component accordingly.

If the removal was unintentional, consider re-adding the password input:

      <NoxInput
        autofocus={true}
        label={t('AList.Site')}
        selectTextOnFocus={false}
        text={text}
        setText={setText}
      />
+     <NoxInput
+       label={t('AList.Password')}
+       selectTextOnFocus={false}
+       text={pwd}
+       setText={setPwd}
+       secureTextEntry
+     />

If the removal was intentional, please remove the unused pwd state:

- const [pwd, setPwd] = React.useState(cred?.[1] ?? '');

  const handleSubmit = () => {
    setText('');
-   setPwd('');
-   onSubmit([text, pwd]);
+   onSubmit([text]);
  };

  useEffect(() => {
    setText(cred?.[0] ?? '');
-   setPwd(cred?.[1] ?? '');
  }, [cred]);

Line range hint 1-60: Verify alignment with PR objectives

The changes in this file, while improving the dialog structure, don't seem to directly address the color issue mentioned in the PR objectives (#562). The modifications here are focused on the credential dialog structure and export method.

Could you please clarify how these changes relate to the color input problem described in the linked issue? If they're not related, consider updating the PR description to accurately reflect the scope of changes in this pull request.

src/components/setting/appearances/NoWeebDialog.tsx (3)

1-15: LGTM: Imports and component interface are well-defined.

The imports cover all necessary dependencies, and the component interface is clear and concise.


149-171: LGTM: Styles and export are well-implemented.

The styles are cleanly separated using StyleSheet.create, and the export correctly wraps the component in a Portal for proper overlay rendering.


1-171: Overall assessment: Well-structured component with room for improvement.

The NoWeebDialog component is well-implemented, providing a clean interface for customizing appearance settings. However, there are a few areas that could be improved:

  1. Implement color validation to prevent invalid inputs.
  2. Add error handling and validation in the onSubmit function.
  3. Enhance user experience with real-time color preview updates.

Addressing these points will make the component more robust and user-friendly.

package.json (3)

136-136: Review devDependency updates

Several devDependencies have been updated:

  • TypeScript-related packages (@types/jest, @types/node, @types/react) have been updated to newer versions.
  • ESLint and related plugins have been updated.

These updates are generally beneficial for improved type checking, linting, and overall developer experience.

To ensure these changes don't introduce unexpected issues:

  1. Run the TypeScript compiler to check for any new type errors.
  2. Run ESLint to ensure no new linting errors are introduced.
#!/bin/bash
# Run TypeScript compiler and ESLint
npx tsc --noEmit
npx eslint .

Consider implementing a strategy for managing devDependency updates:

  1. Regularly update devDependencies to benefit from the latest improvements and bug fixes.
  2. Use a tool like npm-check-updates to automate the process of identifying available updates.
  3. Include running the TypeScript compiler and ESLint in your CI/CD pipeline to catch any issues early.

Also applies to: 138-139, 153-153, 161-161


Line range hint 177-179: Review package manager and Node.js version

  1. The project requires Node.js version 18.0.0 or higher, which is good for leveraging newer JavaScript features and improved performance.
  2. The package manager is set to Yarn 4.4.1, which is a significant version ahead of the more commonly used Yarn 1.x or 3.x.

To ensure consistency across development environments:

  1. Verify that all developers and CI/CD systems are using Node.js 18 or higher.
  2. Check that Yarn 4.4.1 is being used consistently across all development and build environments.
#!/bin/bash
# Check Node.js and Yarn versions
node --version
yarn --version

Consider the following recommendations:

  1. Document the reasons for using Yarn 4 and any specific features it provides for this project.
  2. Ensure all team members are familiar with Yarn 4's features and potential differences from earlier versions.
  3. Update CI/CD pipelines and documentation to reflect the use of Yarn 4.
  4. Consider adding a .nvmrc file to the project root to specify the exact Node.js version for consistent development environments.

32-32: Review dependency updates and custom repositories

The package.json file has been updated with several dependency changes:

  1. Multiple dependencies have been updated to newer versions, which is generally good for security and feature improvements.
  2. Some dependencies are using custom GitHub repositories or specific commits, which may indicate necessary customizations or bug fixes.
  3. The zustand package has been updated from ^4.5.5 to ^5.0.0-rc.2, which is a major version change and may introduce breaking changes.

To ensure these changes don't introduce unexpected issues:

  1. Review the changelogs of updated packages, especially zustand, for any breaking changes.
  2. Run the application's test suite to catch any compatibility issues.
  3. Perform manual testing of features that rely on updated packages.

Consider implementing a dependency management strategy:

  1. Use a tool like npm-check-updates to regularly review and update dependencies.
  2. Document the reasons for using custom repositories or specific commits in the project documentation.
  3. For major version updates like zustand, create a separate PR to isolate and test these changes thoroughly.

Also applies to: 42-42, 59-59, 64-64, 73-73, 81-81, 88-88, 90-90, 97-97, 102-102, 108-109, 116-118

src/components/style.ts (3)

3-3: Importing colord library for color validation

The colord library is correctly imported to handle color validation, which enhances the robustness of color input handling.


7-7: Importing randomChoice utility function

The randomChoice function is appropriately imported from '@utils/Utils' and is used for selecting random background images, which adds variability to the styling.


8-8: Importing logger for error logging

The logger module is correctly imported to handle error logging, which is essential for diagnosing issues during color validation.

Comment on lines +35 to +39
<Input
style={style}
value={text}
onChangeText={(val: string) => setText(val)}
label={label}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Issues Found: Missing color validation and crash prevention mechanisms.

  • Found color parsing in src/components/player/controls/WavyAnimation.tsx without accompanying validation or error handling.

Consider adding color validation and try/catch blocks to prevent potential crashes due to invalid color inputs.

🔗 Analysis chain

LGTM: Input component rendering updated correctly.

The changes to the rendered Input component are appropriate:

  1. Adding the style prop allows for custom styling, which addresses the color-related issues mentioned in the linked issue.
  2. Passing the label prop ensures that the label is rendered correctly.

These modifications align well with the PR objectives and the requirements outlined in the linked issue.

To ensure that these changes effectively address the color input issues mentioned in the linked issue, please run the following verification steps:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify color input handling in the application

# Test: Check for color validation logic
echo "Checking for color validation logic..."
rg --type typescript 'color.*validation|validateColor' src/

# Test: Look for crash prevention mechanisms
echo "Looking for crash prevention mechanisms..."
rg --type typescript 'try.*catch.*color' src/

# Test: Examine color input parsing
echo "Examining color input parsing..."
rg --type typescript 'parseColor|color.*parse' src/

echo "Please manually verify that these results address the color input issues mentioned in the linked issue."

Length of output: 742


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify color input handling in the application with corrected file types

# Test: Check for color validation logic
echo "Checking for color validation logic..."
rg --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx' 'color.*validation|validateColor' src/

# Test: Look for crash prevention mechanisms
echo "Looking for crash prevention mechanisms..."
rg --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx' 'try\s*\{\s*[^}]*color[^}]*\}' src/

# Test: Examine color input parsing
echo "Examining color input parsing..."
rg --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx' 'parseColor|color.*parse' src/

Length of output: 565

Comment on lines +17 to +32
const NoWeebDialog = ({ visible, setVisible }: Props) => {
const { t } = useTranslation();
const playerStyle = useNoxSetting(state => state.playerStyle);
const setPlayerStyle = useNoxSetting(state => state.setPlayerStyle);
const [primaryColor, setPrimaryColor] = React.useState('');
const [secondaryColor, setSecondaryColor] = React.useState('');
const [contrastColor, setContrastColor] = React.useState('');
const [backgroundColor, setBackgroundColor] = React.useState('');

React.useEffect(() => {
if (!visible) return;
setPrimaryColor(playerStyle.colors.primary);
setSecondaryColor(playerStyle.colors.secondary);
setContrastColor(playerStyle.customColors.playlistDrawerBackgroundColor);
setBackgroundColor(playerStyle.colors.background);
}, [visible]);
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Consider implementing color validation.

The component initializes color states correctly, but there's no validation to ensure that the color values are valid. Consider adding a color validation function to prevent potential issues with invalid color inputs.

You could implement a simple validation function like this:

const isValidColor = (color: string): boolean => {
  return /^#[0-9A-F]{6}$/i.test(color);
};

Then use this function when setting the color states:

setPrimaryColor(isValidColor(playerStyle.colors.primary) ? playerStyle.colors.primary : '#000000');

Comment on lines +34 to +46
const onSubmit = () => {
setVisible(false);
setPlayerStyle(
replaceStyleColor({
playerStyle,
primaryColor,
secondaryColor,
contrastColor,
backgroundColor,
noWeeb: true,
})
);
};
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Add error handling and validation to onSubmit function.

The onSubmit function updates the player style without any error handling or validation. Consider adding checks to ensure all color values are valid before updating the style.

You could modify the onSubmit function like this:

const onSubmit = () => {
  if (isValidColor(primaryColor) && isValidColor(secondaryColor) && 
      isValidColor(contrastColor) && isValidColor(backgroundColor)) {
    setVisible(false);
    setPlayerStyle(
      replaceStyleColor({
        playerStyle,
        primaryColor,
        secondaryColor,
        contrastColor,
        backgroundColor,
        noWeeb: true,
      })
    );
  } else {
    // Show an error message to the user
    Alert.alert('Invalid Color', 'Please enter valid color values.');
  }
};

Comment on lines +48 to +145
return (
<GenericDialog
visible={visible}
onClose={() => setVisible(false)}
onSubmit={onSubmit}
title={t('AppearanceSettings.noWeebSkinsDesc')}
>
<ScrollView>
<View style={{ alignItems: 'center' }}>
<Image
style={{ width: 60, height: 60 }}
source={
'https://i2.hdslb.com/bfs/archive/7d83d7c95b11df26a700f445788877ef279c4b80.jpg@600w_600h_1c.png'
}
/>
</View>
<View style={styles.rowView}>
<View
style={[
{
backgroundColor: primaryColor,
},
styles.colorBlock,
]}
/>
<View style={styles.colorBlockSpace} />
<Text>{t('AppearanceSettings.PrimaryColor')}</Text>
<NoxInput
autofocus={false}
selectTextOnFocus={false}
style={{ color: playerStyle.colors.primary }}
text={primaryColor}
setText={setPrimaryColor}
reactNative={true}
/>
</View>
<View style={styles.rowView}>
<View
style={[
{
backgroundColor: secondaryColor,
},
styles.colorBlock,
]}
/>
<View style={styles.colorBlockSpace} />
<Text>{t('AppearanceSettings.SecondaryColor')}</Text>
<NoxInput
autofocus={false}
selectTextOnFocus={false}
style={{ color: playerStyle.colors.primary }}
text={secondaryColor}
setText={setSecondaryColor}
reactNative={true}
/>
</View>
<View style={styles.rowView}>
<View
style={[
{
backgroundColor: contrastColor,
},
styles.colorBlock,
]}
/>
<View style={styles.colorBlockSpace} />
<Text>{t('AppearanceSettings.ContrastColor')}</Text>
<NoxInput
autofocus={false}
selectTextOnFocus={false}
style={{ color: playerStyle.colors.primary }}
text={contrastColor}
setText={setContrastColor}
reactNative={true}
/>
</View>
<View style={styles.rowView}>
<View
style={[
{
backgroundColor: backgroundColor,
},
styles.colorBlock,
]}
/>
<View style={styles.colorBlockSpace} />
<Text>{t('AppearanceSettings.BackgroundColor')}</Text>
<NoxInput
autofocus={false}
selectTextOnFocus={false}
style={{ color: playerStyle.colors.primary }}
text={backgroundColor}
setText={setBackgroundColor}
reactNative={true}
/>
</View>
</ScrollView>
</GenericDialog>
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Enhance user experience with real-time color preview updates.

The color input fields and preview blocks are well-implemented. However, consider updating the color blocks in real-time as the user types in the input fields. This would provide immediate visual feedback and improve the user experience.

You could achieve this by updating the style of the color blocks directly with the state variables:

<View
  style={[
    {
      backgroundColor: primaryColor, // Use state variable directly
    },
    styles.colorBlock,
  ]}
/>

Also, consider adding a debounce function to the color input to prevent excessive re-renders:

import { debounce } from 'lodash';

// ...

const debouncedSetPrimaryColor = React.useCallback(
  debounce((color: string) => setPrimaryColor(color), 300),
  []
);

// ...

<NoxInput
  // ...
  setText={debouncedSetPrimaryColor}
  // ...
/>

Comment on lines 97 to 107
if (
!(
colord(primaryColor).isValid() &&
colord(secondaryColor).isValid() &&
colord(contrastColor).isValid() &&
colord(backgroundColor).isValid()
)
) {
logger.error('[color converter] color invalid');
return playerStyle;
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Enhance error handling for invalid color inputs

Currently, when invalid colors are detected, the function logs an error and returns the original playerStyle. This may lead to silent failures where the user doesn't understand why their color changes aren't applied.

Consider the following improvements:

  • Provide User Feedback: Inform the user that their color input is invalid so they can correct it.
  • Use Default Colors: Fall back to default or safe color values instead of returning the unmodified style.
  • Throw an Error: Propagate an error to the caller to handle it appropriately, ensuring that invalid inputs are not silently ignored.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Simplify the color validation logic

The current validation condition involves nested parentheses, which can affect readability. Refactoring the condition can make the code cleaner and more maintainable.

Apply this diff to simplify the validation:

+  const colorsToValidate = [primaryColor, secondaryColor, contrastColor, backgroundColor];
+  const allColorsValid = colorsToValidate.every((color) => colord(color).isValid());
+  if (!allColorsValid) {
     logger.error('[color converter] color invalid');
     return playerStyle;
   }
-  if (
-    !(
-      colord(primaryColor).isValid() &&
-      colord(secondaryColor).isValid() &&
-      colord(contrastColor).isValid() &&
-      colord(backgroundColor).isValid()
-    )
-  ) {
-    logger.error('[color converter] color invalid');
-    return playerStyle;
-  }
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
if (
!(
colord(primaryColor).isValid() &&
colord(secondaryColor).isValid() &&
colord(contrastColor).isValid() &&
colord(backgroundColor).isValid()
)
) {
logger.error('[color converter] color invalid');
return playerStyle;
}
const colorsToValidate = [primaryColor, secondaryColor, contrastColor, backgroundColor];
const allColorsValid = colorsToValidate.every((color) => colord(color).isValid());
if (!allColorsValid) {
logger.error('[color converter] color invalid');
return playerStyle;
}

@lovegaoshi lovegaoshi merged commit ba455a9 into master Sep 28, 2024
4 of 5 checks passed
Copy link

This was referenced Oct 9, 2024
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Oct 24, 2024
This was referenced Nov 4, 2024
This was referenced Nov 14, 2024
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Dec 3, 2024
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Dec 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

颜色问题
1 participant