Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merge Protocol Defense Tasks into Dev #518

Merged
merged 65 commits into from
Aug 20, 2024
Merged

Merge Protocol Defense Tasks into Dev #518

merged 65 commits into from
Aug 20, 2024

Conversation

koloz193
Copy link
Contributor

@koloz193 koloz193 commented Jun 9, 2024

What ❔

The purpose of these tasks is to make the protocol more resilient while increasing the quality of life when it comes to development, interop, and having a correct running system.

Why ❔

Checklist

  • PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog entries from PRs).
  • Tests for the changes have been added / updated.
  • Documentation comments have been added / updated.

@koloz193 koloz193 marked this pull request as ready for review June 10, 2024 03:59
.codespell/wordlist.txt Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
l1-contracts/contracts/bridge/L1SharedBridge.sol Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
l1-contracts/contracts/bridge/L1SharedBridge.sol Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
l1-contracts/contracts/common/L1ContractErrors.sol Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
l1-contracts/contracts/upgrades/BaseZkSyncUpgrade.sol Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
system-contracts/bootloader/bootloader.yul Show resolved Hide resolved
@@ -147,7 +169,7 @@ contract ExecutorFacet is ZkSyncHyperchainBase, IExecutor {

// Used as bitmap to set/check log processing happens exactly once.
// See SystemLogKey enum in Constants.sol for ordering.
uint256 processedLogs;
uint256 processedLogs = 0;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why change this line?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

for all these OZ suggested adding in the default values. i dont have a strong opinion on keeping or removing

@@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ contract L1Messenger is IL1Messenger, ISystemContract {
calldataPtr += 4;

bytes32[] memory l2ToL1LogsTreeArray = new bytes32[](L2_TO_L1_LOGS_MERKLE_TREE_LEAVES);
bytes32 reconstructedChainedLogsHash;
bytes32 reconstructedChainedLogsHash = bytes32(0);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

for all these OZ suggested adding in the default values. i dont have a strong opinion on keeping or removing

@@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ contract L1Messenger is IL1Messenger, ISystemContract {
/// Check messages
uint32 numberOfMessages = uint32(bytes4(_totalL2ToL1PubdataAndStateDiffs[calldataPtr:calldataPtr + 4]));
calldataPtr += 4;
bytes32 reconstructedChainedMessagesHash;
bytes32 reconstructedChainedMessagesHash = bytes32(0);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

for all these OZ suggested adding in the default values. i dont have a strong opinion on keeping or removing

@@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ contract L1Messenger is IL1Messenger, ISystemContract {
/// Check bytecodes
uint32 numberOfBytecodes = uint32(bytes4(_totalL2ToL1PubdataAndStateDiffs[calldataPtr:calldataPtr + 4]));
calldataPtr += 4;
bytes32 reconstructedChainedL1BytecodesRevealDataHash;
bytes32 reconstructedChainedL1BytecodesRevealDataHash = bytes32(0);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

for all these OZ suggested adding in the default values. i dont have a strong opinion on keeping or removing

Copy link
Member

@vladbochok vladbochok left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please fix merge conflicts

@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ProxyAdmin and ITransparentUpgradeableProxy imports are not updated to use the v4 alias:

import {ProxyAdmin} from "@openzeppelin/contracts/proxy/transparent/ProxyAdmin.sol";
import {ITransparentUpgradeableProxy} from "@openzeppelin/contracts/proxy/transparent/TransparentUpgradeableProxy.sol";

It should be changed to:

import {ProxyAdmin} from "@openzeppelin/contracts-v4/proxy/transparent/ProxyAdmin.sol";
import {ITransparentUpgradeableProxy} from "@openzeppelin/contracts-v4/proxy/transparent/TransparentUpgradeableProxy.sol";

@benceharomi
Copy link
Contributor

Nothing is depending on the OZ v5 contracts packages yet, I would remove them from lib and package.json until they are actually needed.

Copy link

Coverage after merging protocol-defense into dev will be

85.88%

Coverage Report
FileStmtsBranchesFuncsLinesUncovered Lines
contracts/bridge
   L1ERC20Bridge.sol81.82%80%75%83.87%62, 70, 70–71, 73–74
   L1SharedBridge.sol77.35%68.66%79.41%79.81%103–104, 111–112, 119, 119–120, 133–137, 153–154, 162–163, 175–176, 178–179, 190, 190, 190–194, 194–195, 197, 202–204, 204–205, 207–209, 209–210, 212, 224, 233, 233–234, 393–394, 396–397, 528–529, 545–546, 556–557, 572–573, 669–670, 911, 916, 95–96
contracts/bridgehub
   Bridgehub.sol89.29%74.07%100%91.49%100–101, 112–113, 132–133, 155–156, 158–159, 332–333, 49, 63–64
contracts/common
   ReentrancyGuard.sol90%66.67%100%92.86%78–79
contracts/common/libraries
   L2ContractHelper.sol42.86%0%50%52.63%25–26, 31–32, 35–36, 50, 52, 52–53, 57, 57–58, 66
   SemVer.sol100%100%100%100%
   UncheckedMath.sol100%100%100%100%
   UnsafeBytes.sol100%100%100%100%
contracts/governance
   ChainAdmin.sol0%0%0%0%27, 27–28, 30, 32–33, 39–40, 47–48, 56, 56–57, 60, 62–63, 63, 66, 69, 78, 78–79, 81
   Governance.sol91.67%94.74%95%89.86%44, 44–45, 48, 50–51, 53–54
contracts/state-transition
   StateTransitionManager.sol60.13%42.86%50%65.42%101, 106–110, 116, 149–150, 152–153, 155–156, 158–159, 201, 203–204, 209, 211, 211–212, 215–217, 219–220, 255, 275, 289, 294, 299, 304, 309, 314, 319, 386, 386–387, 390, 455–456, 92, 92–93
   TestnetVerifier.sol44.44%33.33%50%50%16, 16, 16, 32
   ValidatorTimelock.sol90.41%83.33%94.74%89.58%241, 59–61, 82–83
   Verifier.sol89.88%35.71%96.30%90.93%1673–1674, 287–302, 305–308, 311–318, 321–328, 331–332, 335–336, 339, 384–385, 395–396, 406–407, 417–418, 428–429, 444–445, 454, 454–455, 904–905
contracts/state-transition/chain-deps
   DiamondInit.sol77.55%45.45%100%86.11%34–35, 37–38, 40–41, 43–44, 46–47, 71
   DiamondProxy.sol80.77%62.50%100%88.24%16, 16, 16–17, 27
contracts/state-transition/chain-deps/facets
   Admin.sol86.21%72.73%92.31%87.30%109, 109–110, 112–113, 178, 180, 83–84, 94–95
   Executor.sol82.04%63.41%84.38%87.90%137–138, 192, 197, 202, 207, 212, 217, 222, 227, 230–231, 235–236, 240–242, 244–245, 260–261, 280, 294–295, 361–362, 425, 447–449, 469, 48, 48–49, 519–520, 528–529, 549, 556–557, 57, 59, 59–60, 619, 62, 620, 63, 646–647, 696–697, 70, 700–701, 71, 74–75, 775
   Getters.sol92.08%100%90.24%93.10%153, 206, 72, 77
   Mailbox.sol100%100%100%100%
   ZkSyncHyperchainBase.sol92.86%85.71%100%92.86%55–56
contracts/state-transition/libraries
   Diamond.sol93.33%80.77%100%95.96%109–110, 113, 115, 117, 120, 198–199, 316
   LibMap.sol100%100%100%100%
   Merkle.sol100%100%100%100%
   PriorityQueue.sol100%100%100%100%
   TransactionValidator.sol94.44%88.24%100%96%66–67, 69–70
contracts/upgrades
   BaseZkSyncUpgrade.sol58.20%27.27%100%60.23%104, 104–105, 108, 111, 114–115, 126, 126–127, 130, 133, 136–137, 151–153, 171–173, 212–213, 215, 215–216, 232–233, 249–250, 252–253, 258–259, 259–260, 271–272, 278–279, 285–286, 293–294, 298–299, 308–309, 311–312, 75–76
   BaseZkSyncUpgradeGenesis.sol56.67%14.29%100%68.18%25, 25–26, 33–34, 40–41, 52–53, 62–63, 65–66
   DefaultUpgrade.sol100%100%100%100%
   GenesisUpgrade.sol100%100%100%100%
contracts/vendor
   AddressAliasHelper.sol100%100%100%100%

@koloz193 koloz193 merged commit 8be87b2 into dev Aug 20, 2024
20 checks passed
@koloz193 koloz193 deleted the protocol-defense branch August 20, 2024 15:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants