-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CI: unify environment creation #24632
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #24632 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 92.38% 92.37% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 166 166
Lines 52395 52395
==========================================
- Hits 48403 48402 -1
- Misses 3992 3993 +1
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #24632 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 91.81% 91.77% -0.05%
==========================================
Files 175 175
Lines 52580 52580
==========================================
- Hits 48278 48255 -23
- Misses 4302 4325 +23
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
This sets up DB in both travis and azure. Have not tested DB jobs on Azure but maybe worth a try. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
needs some edits
yes remove the original files |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
besides the comments, there is an inconsistent use of the echo
commands, with cases like:
echo Error
echo "done"
echo "[done]"
And some times with a bare echo
before and some without (I guess those add blank lines).
I'd be consistent and use the same format everywhere. I don't think we are using the squared brackets in any other script. So, I'd simply use: echo "some message"
everywhere. But feel free to check the log and pick the format that makes more sense, but use the same everywhere.
and yes, please delete the replaced files in this same PR. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Check azure, your script is failing.
@datapythonista - Azure is failing on conda update specifically - Another question is on line 32 of |
Yes, please update the conda update statement to the new syntax. Anaconda can release a new conda version, but not create a new installable immediately, that's why it's common to update conda itself after installation. It's similar to when you install Linux and immediately run I'm not sure about the |
@datapythonista / @jreback - any thoughts on this PR? |
this needs to wait until after 0.24.1 is out at a minimum |
can you merge master and i'll loo again here |
@jreback - green. |
@saurav2608 pls confirm for each build that we are running the same number of tests both before and after. This change could easy miss testing things and we would not easily know. (take the build on master right before you merged). check on both travis and azure; link the builds here. |
@jreback : I compared this build to one just before. Details -
For Travis the order was a bit different. But I compared the this build with the one just before. And compared 4 builds
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Didn't see this PR before, I'll close #25377 once this gets merged.
@saurav2608 ok this looks fine. I still am going to wait till we do 0.24.2, we will have to backport this as well I think. We have had CI brokeness in the past from even minor changes in the CI code. |
Can you merge master on this? |
What's the status of this PR? I constantly need to look up manually which version is in failing posix environments. If this is still taking longer, can we merge #25377 in the interim? |
|
this needs a rebase and the PY2 and numpy bump merged first. |
@saurav2608 if you wan to rebase this, i think we can do this now. |
@jreback - green |
thanks @jreback and thanks @datapythonista for guiding this along. |
closes #24498
closes #23923