Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixed docstrings as referenced in issue no: #24071 #26520

Closed
wants to merge 65 commits into from
Closed

Fixed docstrings as referenced in issue no: #24071 #26520

wants to merge 65 commits into from

Conversation

killerontherun1
Copy link
Contributor

tests : ./scripts/validate_docstrings.py --prefix=pandas.core --errors=GL01,GL02

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 25, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #26520 into master will decrease coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #26520      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   91.75%   91.74%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         174      174              
  Lines       50665    50665              
==========================================
- Hits        46489    46485       -4     
- Misses       4176     4180       +4
Flag Coverage Δ
#multiple 90.26% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
#single 41.71% <100%> (-0.09%) ⬇️
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pandas/core/groupby/groupby.py 97.23% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
pandas/io/gbq.py 78.94% <0%> (-10.53%) ⬇️
pandas/core/frame.py 97% <0%> (-0.12%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ba48fc4...62deebc. Read the comment docs.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 25, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #26520 into master will decrease coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #26520      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   91.75%   91.74%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         174      174              
  Lines       50665    50665              
==========================================
- Hits        46489    46485       -4     
- Misses       4176     4180       +4
Flag Coverage Δ
#multiple 90.26% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
#single 41.71% <100%> (-0.09%) ⬇️
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pandas/core/groupby/groupby.py 97.23% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
pandas/io/gbq.py 78.94% <0%> (-10.53%) ⬇️
pandas/core/frame.py 97% <0%> (-0.12%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ba48fc4...3d10423. Read the comment docs.

topper-123 and others added 27 commits May 25, 2019 19:53
@killerontherun1
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yep. Lot of file changes. Thanks so much for the link. I went through the options, but none of them seem to be helping me sort out my branch. It is be because I merged the master with this branch. Man, my branch is a real mess now.

Any idea how I can rebase this branch to my first commit so that I can remove the other unrelated commits from here?

@datapythonista
Copy link
Member

if the instructions in the link I sent don't work, you'll probably want to start a new branch from an updated master, and manually apply the relevant commits from this branch there.

@killerontherun1
Copy link
Contributor Author

killerontherun1 commented May 26, 2019 via email

@datapythonista
Copy link
Member

You surely can, but if you're unsure of those things, better do the simplest thing. pandas is not the best project for experimenting, this is creating noise for too many people.

@killerontherun1
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closing this PR. I'm terribly sorry about the noise. Did not mean to waste anybody's time. Thank you so much for your patience with me.

@datapythonista
Copy link
Member

No worries, this problem with the branch happens very often (that's why I wrote the post on how to fix it).

My point is only to better not try fancy things pushing here, as this notifies many people. Feel free to open a new PR with the changes, and let's continue there. Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

DOC: Fix quotes position in pandas.core