Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Explicitly suggest 'type_ascription' feature #61374

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 1, 2019
Merged

Explicitly suggest 'type_ascription' feature #61374

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 1, 2019

Conversation

VirrageS
Copy link
Contributor

Closes: #61325

r? @estebank

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @estebank (or someone else) soon.

If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label May 30, 2019
@Centril
Copy link
Contributor

Centril commented May 30, 2019

r? @Centril @bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 30, 2019

📌 Commit 4c5eb8e has been approved by Centril

@rust-highfive rust-highfive assigned Centril and unassigned estebank May 30, 2019
@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 30, 2019
Centril added a commit to Centril/rust that referenced this pull request May 30, 2019
Explicitly suggest 'type_ascription' feature

Closes: rust-lang#61325

r? @estebank
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request May 31, 2019
Rollup of 10 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #60897 (error: remove StringError from Debug output)
 - #61278 (Miri: give machine the chance to tag all allocations)
 - #61304 (Speed up Azure CI installing Windows dependencies)
 - #61342 (Set ellipsis_inclusive_range_patterns lint to warn)
 - #61344 (Add regression test for const generics ICE)
 - #61359 (Fix links in Deref documentation)
 - #61363 (Stabilize iter_nth_back feature)
 - #61369 (Fixed lifetime misspelling)
 - #61372 (Migrate some books to mdbook version 0.2)
 - #61374 (Explicitly suggest 'type_ascription' feature)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
pietroalbini added a commit to pietroalbini/rust that referenced this pull request May 31, 2019
Explicitly suggest 'type_ascription' feature

Closes: rust-lang#61325

r? @estebank
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 1, 2019
Rollup of 11 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #60897 (error: remove StringError from Debug output)
 - #61304 (Speed up Azure CI installing Windows dependencies)
 - #61319 (Swap order of `unsafe async fn` to `async unsafe fn`)
 - #61342 (Set ellipsis_inclusive_range_patterns lint to warn)
 - #61344 (Add regression test for const generics ICE)
 - #61359 (Fix links in Deref documentation)
 - #61363 (Stabilize iter_nth_back feature)
 - #61369 (Fixed lifetime misspelling)
 - #61372 (Migrate some books to mdbook version 0.2)
 - #61374 (Explicitly suggest 'type_ascription' feature)
 - #61382 (Fixed a typo in core::convert::AsMut)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors bors merged commit 4c5eb8e into rust-lang:master Jun 1, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

When presenting the proper type ascription syntax, mention the feature gate
5 participants