Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Status of testing Providers that were prepared on September 21, 2024 #42393

Closed
eladkal opened this issue Sep 21, 2024 · 18 comments
Closed

Status of testing Providers that were prepared on September 21, 2024 #42393

eladkal opened this issue Sep 21, 2024 · 18 comments
Labels
area:providers kind:meta High-level information important to the community testing status Status of testing releases

Comments

@eladkal
Copy link
Contributor

eladkal commented Sep 21, 2024

Body

I have a kind request for all the contributors to the latest provider packages release.
Could you please help us to test the RC versions of the providers?

The guidelines on how to test providers can be found in

Verify providers by contributors

Let us know in the comment, whether the issue is addressed.

Those are providers that require testing as there were some substantial changes introduced:

Provider airbyte: 4.0.0rc1

Provider alibaba: 2.9.1rc1

Provider amazon: 8.29.0rc1

Provider apache.hdfs: 4.5.1rc1

Provider apache.impala: 1.5.1rc1

Provider apache.livy: 3.9.1rc1

Provider apache.spark: 4.11.0rc1

Provider cloudant: 4.0.0rc1

Provider cncf.kubernetes: 8.4.2rc1

Provider common.io: 1.4.1rc1

Provider common.sql: 1.17.0rc1

Provider databricks: 6.10.0rc1

Provider docker: 3.14.0rc1

Provider elasticsearch: 5.5.1rc1

Provider fab: 1.4.0rc1

Provider google: 10.23.0rc1

Provider jdbc: 4.5.1rc1

Provider microsoft.azure: 10.5.0rc1

Provider microsoft.mssql: 3.9.1rc1

Provider mongo: 4.2.1rc1

Provider mysql: 5.7.1rc1

Provider odbc: 4.7.1rc1

Provider openai: 1.4.0rc1

Provider openlineage: 1.12.0rc1

Provider papermill: 3.8.1rc1

Provider postgres: 5.13.0rc1

Provider snowflake: 5.7.1rc1

All users involved in the PRs:
@gaurav7261 @ephraimbuddy @jscheffl @harryshi10 @dabla @moiseenkov @marcosmarxm @arnaubadia @o-nikolas @Artuz37 @geraj1010 @perry2of5 @josix @kacpermuda @dondaum @Mayuresh16 @olegkachur-e @ferruzzi @mob

Committer

  • I acknowledge that I am a maintainer/committer of the Apache Airflow project.
@eladkal eladkal added kind:meta High-level information important to the community testing status Status of testing releases labels Sep 21, 2024
@jscheffl
Copy link
Contributor

Signed-off my fixes I contributed. They were mainly related to failing main, if pytests are fine then all is good.

airflow-oss-bot added a commit to astronomer/astronomer-providers that referenced this issue Sep 22, 2024
@Owen-CH-Leung
Copy link
Contributor

Confirmed that the deprecation warning is gone with version 5.5.1rc1. Thanks

@dondaum
Copy link
Contributor

dondaum commented Sep 22, 2024

Tested #40171. Worked as expected.

@seyoon-lim
Copy link
Contributor

I have tested apache.spark: 4.11.0rc1(#40757) and it works as intended. Thanks

@josix
Copy link
Contributor

josix commented Sep 23, 2024

Tested openai: 1.4.0rc1 #41336, it works as expeted, thanks!

@topherinternational
Copy link
Contributor

Checked #41555 and #41717, they are good to go.

@moiseenkov
Copy link
Contributor

#41576, #42130, #41946 are good

@molcay
Copy link
Contributor

molcay commented Sep 23, 2024

#42255 works as expected

@VladaZakharova
Copy link
Contributor

#42342 looks good

@GlenboLake
Copy link
Contributor

#41796 looks good

@JDarDagran
Copy link
Contributor

#41775 verified working

@gopidesupavan
Copy link
Member

Verified #41918 working fine. Thank you for release.
For #41848 have environment issues to test, Just seen vincent message system tests are working fine on the latest provider package.

@ephraimbuddy
Copy link
Contributor

Tested #41804, and #41437. No interactions with Airflow 2

@gopidesupavan
Copy link
Member

Tested #41712 with system test and no issues, working fine.

@harryshi10
Copy link
Contributor

#41658 has been tested and works as expected.

@dirrao
Copy link
Contributor

dirrao commented Sep 24, 2024

#42129, #41552, #41633, #41747, #41720
I have validated basic things and they looks good to me. However, I couldn't able to test all functionality of auth, configuration and logging changes.

@eladkal
Copy link
Contributor Author

eladkal commented Sep 24, 2024

Thank you everyone. Providers are released.

I invite everyone to help improve providers for the next release, a list of open issues can be found here.

@eladkal eladkal closed this as completed Sep 24, 2024
@geraj1010
Copy link
Contributor

I tested #41416 before the PR was closed and the logging worked as expected. Apologies for the late response, my GitHub account was just recently restored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area:providers kind:meta High-level information important to the community testing status Status of testing releases
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests