[compiler] Validate type configs for hooks/non-hooks #30888
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
[ghstack-poisoned]
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
josephsavona
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 5, 2024
ghstack-source-id: 787575b0db97ee20dade99af4982d40a2363de46 Pull Request resolved: #30888
facebook-github-bot
added
CLA Signed
React Core Team
Alternative to #30868. The goal is to ensure that the types coming out of moduleTypeProvider are valid wrt to hook typing. If something is named like a hook, then it must be typed as a hook (or don't type it). [ghstack-poisoned]
Alternative to #30868. The goal is to ensure that the types coming out of moduleTypeProvider are valid wrt to hook typing. If something is named like a hook, then it must be typed as a hook (or don't type it). [ghstack-poisoned]
Alternative to #30868. The goal is to ensure that the types coming out of moduleTypeProvider are valid wrt to hook typing. If something is named like a hook, then it must be typed as a hook (or don't type it). [ghstack-poisoned]
Alternative to #30868. The goal is to ensure that the types coming out of moduleTypeProvider are valid wrt to hook typing. If something is named like a hook, then it must be typed as a hook (or don't type it). [ghstack-poisoned]
Alternative to #30868. The goal is to ensure that the types coming out of moduleTypeProvider are valid wrt to hook typing. If something is named like a hook, then it must be typed as a hook (or don't type it). [ghstack-poisoned]
Alternative to #30868. The goal is to ensure that the types coming out of moduleTypeProvider are valid wrt to hook typing. If something is named like a hook, then it must be typed as a hook (or don't type it). [ghstack-poisoned]
mvitousek
approved these changes
Sep 10, 2024
| @@ -794,6 +797,21 @@ export class Environment { | |||
| binding.imported, | |||
| ); | |||
| if (importedType != null) { | |||
| /* | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Maybe factor this out into a helper?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hmm it's kind of tedious to get customize the error message if we extract to a helper, i'm gonna leave it
| @@ -794,6 +797,21 @@ export class Environment { | |||
| binding.imported, | |||
| ); | |||
| if (importedType != null) { | |||
| /* | |||
| * Check that hook-like export names are hook types, and non-hook names are non-hook types. | |||
| * The user-assigned alias isn't decidable by the type provider, so we ignore that for the check. | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Maybe we can enforce that the isHookName of the exported name and the local alias are the same?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think that makes sense, but we should do that everywhere regardless of whether we have a type provider for the module or not. Let's explore that in a follow-up.
gnoff
pushed a commit
to vercel/next.js
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 12, 2024
**breaking change for canary users: Bumps peer dependency of React from `19.0.0-rc-7771d3a7-20240827` to `19.0.0-rc-94e652d5-20240912`** [diff facebook/react@7771d3a7...94e652d5](facebook/react@7771d3a...94e652d) <details> <summary>React upstream changes</summary> - facebook/react#30952 - facebook/react#30950 - facebook/react#30946 - facebook/react#30934 - facebook/react#30947 - facebook/react#30945 - facebook/react#30938 - facebook/react#30936 - facebook/react#30879 - facebook/react#30888 - facebook/react#30931 - facebook/react#30930 - facebook/react#30832 - facebook/react#30929 - facebook/react#30926 - facebook/react#30925 - facebook/react#30905 - facebook/react#30900 - facebook/react#30910 - facebook/react#30906 - facebook/react#30899 - facebook/react#30919 - facebook/react#30708 - facebook/react#30907 - facebook/react#30897 - facebook/react#30896 - facebook/react#30895 - facebook/react#30887 - facebook/react#30889 - facebook/react#30893 - facebook/react#30892 - facebook/react#30891 - facebook/react#30882 - facebook/react#30881 - facebook/react#30870 - facebook/react#30849 - facebook/react#30878 - facebook/react#30865 - facebook/react#30869 - facebook/react#30875 - facebook/react#30800 - facebook/react#30762 - facebook/react#30831 - facebook/react#30866 - facebook/react#30853 - facebook/react#30850 - facebook/react#30847 - facebook/react#30842 - facebook/react#30837 - facebook/react#30848 - facebook/react#30844 - facebook/react#30839 - facebook/react#30802 - facebook/react#30841 - facebook/react#30827 - facebook/react#30826 - facebook/react#30825 - facebook/react#30824 - facebook/react#30840 - facebook/react#30838 - facebook/react#30836 - facebook/react#30819 - facebook/react#30816 - facebook/react#30814 - facebook/react#30813 - facebook/react#30812 - facebook/react#30811 </details> --------- Co-authored-by: vercel-release-bot <infra+release@vercel.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):
Alternative to #30868. The goal is to ensure that the types coming out of moduleTypeProvider are valid wrt to hook typing. If something is named like a hook, then it must be typed as a hook (or don't type it).