Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Status of testing Providers that were prepared on August 26, 2023 #33751

Closed
51 of 63 tasks
eladkal opened this issue Aug 25, 2023 · 22 comments
Closed
51 of 63 tasks

Status of testing Providers that were prepared on August 26, 2023 #33751

eladkal opened this issue Aug 25, 2023 · 22 comments
Labels
kind:meta High-level information important to the community testing status Status of testing releases

Comments

@eladkal
Copy link
Contributor

eladkal commented Aug 25, 2023

Body

I have a kind request for all the contributors to the latest provider packages release.
Could you please help us to test the RC versions of the providers?

The guidelines on how to test providers can be found in

Verify providers by contributors

Let us know in the comment, whether the issue is addressed.

Those are providers that require testing as there were some substantial changes introduced:

Provider amazon: 8.6.0rc1

Provider apache.beam: 5.2.2rc1

Provider apache.hive: 6.1.5rc1

Provider apache.pinot: 4.1.3rc1

Provider celery: 3.3.3rc1

Provider cncf.kubernetes: 7.5.0rc1

Provider databricks: 4.4.0rc1

Provider elasticsearch: 5.0.1rc1

Provider exasol: 4.2.4rc1

Provider influxdb: 2.2.2rc1

Provider microsoft.azure: 6.3.0rc1

Provider mysql: 5.3.0rc1

Provider openlineage: 1.0.2rc1

Provider oracle: 3.7.3rc1

Provider salesforce: 5.4.2rc1

Provider sftp: 4.6.0rc1

Provider slack: 8.0.0rc1

Provider snowflake: 5.0.0rc1

Provider trino: 5.3.0rc1

Provider yandex: 3.4.0rc1

All users involved in the PRs:
@amoghrajesh @mobuchowski @zbstof @johnbrandborg @vincbeck @JDarDagran @benchoncy @ellisms @SamWheating @pankajastro @alexbegg @sunank200 @zinal @LipuFei @functicons @hussein-awala @ephraimbuddy @Lee-W
@arjunanan6 @erdos2n @vandonr-amz @fdemiane @Owen-CH-Leung @phanikumv @Taragolis @mati-o @syedahsn @tiranux @covidium @yermalov-here @potiuk

Committer

  • I acknowledge that I am a maintainer/committer of the Apache Airflow project.
@eladkal eladkal added kind:meta High-level information important to the community testing status Status of testing releases labels Aug 25, 2023
airflow-oss-bot added a commit to astronomer/astronomer-providers that referenced this issue Aug 26, 2023
@alexbegg
Copy link
Contributor

Hi,
#33427, #33425, #33359 works as expected, even tested using an external database and all looks good.

@alexbegg
Copy link
Contributor

I also tested #33601 and it no longer has the ImportError warning, as expected

@arjunanan6
Copy link
Contributor

I have just tested #33314, works as expected.

@LipuFei
Copy link
Contributor

LipuFei commented Aug 26, 2023

I haved tested #33652, looks good.

@johnbrandborg
Copy link
Contributor

I have tested #33005 this morning. Messages indicate Service Principal Token is being used, and data was retrieved from a Databricks Workspace.

@potiuk
Copy link
Member

potiuk commented Aug 26, 2023

Checked all my changes. All look good!

@ephraimbuddy
Copy link
Contributor

Tested #33457 and it works fine

@Owen-CH-Leung
Copy link
Contributor

Tested #33135 and it works as expected. For #33306 , it's not working as expected so I have created another PR which just got merged.

#33779

@pankajastro
Copy link
Member

#33598 and #33627 looks good. thanks!

@hussein-awala
Copy link
Member

Checked #33483 and it is present in the different providers.

@Lee-W
Copy link
Member

Lee-W commented Aug 27, 2023

Tested #33716 and #33467. Both works fine. Thanks!

@amoghrajesh
Copy link
Contributor

Tested my changes:

Things do not seem to have regressed and it works as expected. Ran a few dags to target the cncf provider too. It looks good to me.

Thanks!

@mobuchowski
Copy link
Contributor

Tested my changes, everything looks good.

@zinal
Copy link
Contributor

zinal commented Aug 28, 2023

Hi! #29811 looks fine for me, processed the test dag successfully.

@phanikumv
Copy link
Contributor

#32883 looks good

@JDarDagran
Copy link
Contributor

#32910 works as expected.

@yermalov-here
Copy link
Contributor

tested #33656 and it looks good

@ellisms
Copy link
Contributor

ellisms commented Aug 28, 2023

tested #33219 and it looks good.

@fdemiane
Copy link
Contributor

tested #33500, works as expected

@vandonr-amz
Copy link
Contributor

good for me

@vincbeck
Copy link
Contributor

#33327 and #33673 work as expected

@eladkal
Copy link
Contributor Author

eladkal commented Aug 29, 2023

Thank you everyone.
microsoft.azure and cncf.kubernetes are excluded from rc1. I will cut rc2 shortly.
The rest of the providers are released.

I invite everyone to help improve providers for the next release, a list of open issues can be found here.

@eladkal eladkal closed this as completed Aug 29, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind:meta High-level information important to the community testing status Status of testing releases
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests